» » » You have not answered the questions
» » »
» » » why do 10s of millions of shampoo users not go bald
» » »
» » » why do men lose their hair in a horseshoe pattern if shampoo is the
» » cause
» » » while women lose it in an overall pattern
» » It’s like the question asked about why don’t all smokers get cancer?
» »
» » The lucky ones that don’t go bald have a genetically better tolerance
» to
» » the damaging effects of shampoo.
»
» Yes, that’s the answer Diamond Dave but Hangin’ and the others won’t
» accept it. They will continue to believe that shampoo doesn’t cause
» baldness just watch.
hogwash
I have a NASTy balding gene, I was set to go bald on top by age 25, its now 20 yrs later My hair looks better now than it did 15 yrs ago and thats with no transplant
I have always used shampoo no special shampoos, my hair on the sides and back and top front is WAY thicker than it was 10 yrs ago and I continued to use shampoo all along,
the whole shampoo thing is total bullcrap, sorry but you guys have like 3 people who stopped using shampoo that you use to "prove " this theory
I have a genetic tendency towards BALDNESS if i stopped my regimen i would be bald on top within 3 yrs so you would think Im very susceptible to shampoo, so explain how I can use shampoo all my life and my sides and back and top front got WAY THICKER…explain this
i dont believe the shampoo causes baldness theory, its total hogwash
I suppose your theory of male pattern baldness is the hairs in the horseshoe pattern are more susceptible to shampoo and the side hairs are not susceptible to shampoo…ya makes a lot of sense…ya right