err im just showing someone already has that name
AIRHAIR…DUH, read the URL, AIRHAIR.COM
isnt that what you guys have been jawing about for posts and posts AIRHAIR
» » http://www.airhair.com/
»
» Hangin’ what was that for. There’s nothing about Lawrence Cutsinger or
» Nike there? It’s about hair cuts. Does anybody here know anything further
» as to this rumor of Lawrence Cutsinger getting a shoe by Nike named after
» him. Is this all dependent on him proving that shampoo causes baldness in
» July thru his photos or what?
»
» I guess it makes sense for some company to move in now in case it does
» happen. Nike would make sense to me. They seem to capitalize on all the
» stars these days and Lawrence would be a huge star to millions of balding
» men out there. It doesn’t matter how old you are either to push shoes.
» Ever notice the show HOUSE. Do you ever see how the cameras always focus
» on Dr. House’s shoes every so often? I saw him wearing Nike Shox and a
» pair of Converse another time I believe. I could see House in a pair of
» “Air Hair 3’s” to be honest. I love that House guy. He reminds me alot of
» how Hangin’ would be in real life. Kramer, who told you about this?
» » » That’s funny you mention “Air Hair”. This has been discussed a year or
» » so
» » » already but I believe there was rumors last year about
» » Nike
» » » possibly getting involved with naming a shoe after Lawrence Cutsinger
» » and
» » » believe it or not “Air Hair” was the leading name followed by “H-air
» » » Lawrence”.
» » » Diamond Dave, if you
» » » are reading this how much you want to bet Jtelecom, Benjiah, and
» Ramone
» » » will be bidding on the “Air Hair” named after Dr. Lawrence Cutsinger
» if
» » » these actually do hit the market.
» » I remember Dr. Cutsinger telling the forum about the Nike proposal
» Kramer.
» » I will attempt to locate it and paste it here.
»
» Ooooh, please do post it. I am trembling with excitement!
»
» Jtelecom
I just wanted to add to this ridiculously long thread.
» First of all, these “non-shampooers” are obviously using some type of
» shampoo, at least the one who mentioned his “homemade topical”. If there
» were no detergent effect, the hair would not be ‘squeaky clean’. So this
» is a spurious claim. Any detergent applied to the hair is by definition a
» shampoo.
» And guys, all this name-calling is REALLY immature.
FIT2BMATURE…I am the one who uses a homemade topical for regrowth as well as cleaning the hair/scalp.
There is no detergent in it and my hair/scalp is squeaky clean.
It is not a “spurious claim” as you so impolitely put it.
» widows is n0t regrowing his hair
» his pics look terrible
»
» now am i happy about this
» hardly
» he is on mostly the same regimen I am except for not shampooing
»
» I think the regimen has affected widows mentally, he seems deranged
What is up with the attacks on me Hangin? I’m mentally deranged???
I haven’t been here for at least 2 weeks and I find you trashing my good name.
Don’t you get it?
After I appear on Oprah (if she’s lucky) this forum will be famous for having me as a member and this could become a forum with a membership fee after I appear on prime time.
I am regrowing faster than anyone else on the planet due to my beta-sis discovery.
» » widows is n0t regrowing his hair
» » his pics look terrible
» »
» » now am i happy about this
» » hardly
» » he is on mostly the same regimen I am except for not shampooing
» »
» » I think the regimen has affected widows mentally, he seems deranged
» What is up with the attacks on me Hangin? I’m mentally deranged???
»
» I haven’t been here for at least 2 weeks and I find you trashing my good
» name.
» Don’t you get it?
»
» After I appear on Oprah (if she’s lucky) this forum will be famous for
» having me as a member and this could become a forum with a membership fee
» after I appear on prime time.
»
» I am regrowing faster than anyone else on the planet due to my beta-sis
» discovery.
»
» Show some respect…I deserve it.
» Topicals don’t “agree with you” because you insist on using poisonous
» shampoos that bathe your follicles with corrosive chemicals and I would
» bet if you think about it you probably start your shampoo application on
» your crown which would have a devastating effect on the hair there.
»
» Diamond
you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body hair, and amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…SOMEHOW, in your magic- unsubstantiated, non-backed up claim with absolutely no photographic evidence except for some old mans pictures whose still ass bald but claims he was hair-less(i guess he suffered from alopecia totalis eh?), you have convinced yourself that suds=hair loss.
WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather that sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body wash big man? Answer me…
» » Topicals don’t “agree with you” because you insist on using poisonous
» » shampoos that bathe your follicles with corrosive chemicals and I would
» » bet if you think about it you probably start your shampoo application
» on
» » your crown which would have a devastating effect on the hair there.
» »
» » Diamond
»
» you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body hair, and
» amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…SOMEHOW, in your
» magic- unsubstantiated, non-backed up claim with absolutely no
» photographic evidence except for some old mans pictures whose still ass
» bald but claims he was hair-less(i guess he suffered from alopecia totalis
» eh?), you have convinced yourself that suds=hair loss.
»
» WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather that
» sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body wash big
» man? Answer me…
Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other harmful chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is. Kramer, Diamond Dave and even Widowspeak will tell you that the sides and the backs of the hair do not get as much shampoo as the tops of the head because most everyone starts the lathering process either on the crown or the front temple areas. Where does baldness occur first? Either in the crown or the front temple areas depending on how you lather your hair with shampoo. Coincidence? I think not. Now I consider this case closed but of course I will keep the court in session because you non believers will always come up with some other excuse to try to debunk Lawrence’s theory. I beg of you all to go to GetItBack in mid July and see what almost 11 years of not shampooing will do to your hairline when Lawrence unveils his final regrowth photos for all the world to see.
» » you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body hair,
» and
» » amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…» »
» » WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather
» that
» » sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body wash
» big
» » man? Answer me…
»
» Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other harmful
» chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is.
Exactly Hitlerspeak…
Thank you for schooling blahblah the clown for me.
He embarrasses himself everytime he posts in an attempt to look intelligent but it’s not possible for him.
» » First of all, these “non-shampooers” are obviously using some type of
» » shampoo, at least the one who mentioned his “homemade topical”. If
» there
» » were no detergent effect, the hair would not be ‘squeaky clean’. So
» this
» » is a spurious claim. Any detergent applied to the hair is by definition
» a
» » shampoo.
» » And guys, all this name-calling is REALLY immature.
» FIT2BMATURE…I am the one who uses a homemade topical for regrowth as
» well as cleaning the hair/scalp.
»
» There is no detergent in it and my hair/scalp is squeaky clean.
» It is not a “spurious claim” as you so impolitely put it.
»
» The main ingredient in my topical is Witch Hazel.
Yes, witch chazek, an astringent that has a detergent effect. Didn’t mean to be impolite, spurious just means false. No emotion attached to it.
BTW, even water is technically a detergent!
» » » widows started beta sis because of me , moron
» » yeah right Hangin…
» »
» » I found beta-sis through my own research and here you are AGAIN
» claiming
» » it was all because of you. I don’t think so son.
» »
» » I am regrowing my hair faster than anyone else and this includes
» Lawrence
» » Cutsinger and I will be on Oprah before anyone else because I am
» regrowing
» » with no drugs, plugs or rugs.
» »
» » Keep a look out for my next pics. They will be awesome.
» Widows…why don’t you post here more regularly and promote Dr.
» Cutsinger’s theory of shampoo hair loss?
»
» I know Hangin is claiming resposibility for your success but don’t let
» that stop you from posting here. Nobody listens to balding Hangin anyway.
»
» Kramer and I need your support and you’re a great Cutsinger success
» story.
»
» Diamond
we will start calling you delusional diamond
by the way nobody listens to you either , except other delusionals
widows did start beta sis because of me, if the archives went that far back i would look it up
» Yes, witch chazek, an astringent that has a detergent effect. Didn’t mean
» to be impolite, spurious just means false. No emotion attached to it.
» BTW, even water is technically a detergent!
Witch hazel is a natural astringent and can be used on insect bites, cuts and scrapes but to say witch hazel has a detergent effect is a bit of a stretch.
» » » you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body hair,
» » and
» » » amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…» »
» » » WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather
» » that
» » » sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body wash
» » big
» » » man? Answer me…
» »
» » Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other
» harmful
» » chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is.
» Exactly Hitlerspeak…
» Thank you for schooling blahblah the clown for me.
» He embarrasses himself everytime he posts in an attempt to look
» intelligent but it’s not possible for him.
where is the scientific theory that your head hair is sensitive to shampoo and this makes you go bald
you never did explain when I said , why is my side and back hair 3 times as thick as it was 8 yrs ago, despite continual use of shampoo, as it was PAPER THIN in 1999,which according to you ,must have been since I had been using SHAMPOO on it,
» » » » you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body
» hair,
» » » and
» » » » amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…» »
» » » » WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather
» » » that
» » » » sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body
» wash
» » » big
» » » » man? Answer me…
» » »
» » » Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other
» » harmful
» » » chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is.
» » Exactly Hitlerspeak…
» » Thank you for schooling blahblah the clown for me.
» » He embarrasses himself everytime he posts in an attempt to look
» » intelligent but it’s not possible for him.
»
» where is the scientific theory that your head hair is sensitive to shampoo
» and this makes you go bald
»
» you never did explain when I said , why is my side and back hair 3 times
» as thick as it was 8 yrs ago, despite continual use of shampoo, as it was
» PAPER THIN in 1999,which according to you ,must have been
» since I had been using SHAMPOO on it,
»
» explain that einstein
Hangin, it is of my opinion that your hair is not “3 times as thick as it was 8 years ago”. Basically I believe you have been bald for over 20 plus years that you now look at the hair you have left and feel it is thicker than it was in high school but the reality is your hair isn’t thicker. It’s probably exactly the same if not a little less thicker than high school. You just want to feel good about yourself that somehow whatever your doing is working. I believe your mind is convinced of this just like Widowspeak believes he’s regrowing hair and will appear on Oprah. When you compare your hair to your bald spot of course it probably looks pretty damn thick next to bald spot.
Do you have any photos to prove your hair is 3 times as thick now vs. 8 plus years ago? I didn’t think so. Now Hangin’, I know you don’t want to hear this but please drop those suds for a few months and who knows maybe you’ll get your crown back to it’s original glory. I am not trying to get into an argument, this is just my opinion.
» » » Topicals don’t “agree with you” because you insist on using poisonous
» » » shampoos that bathe your follicles with corrosive chemicals and I
» would
» » » bet if you think about it you probably start your shampoo application
» » on
» » » your crown which would have a devastating effect on the hair there.
» » »
» » » Diamond
» »
» » you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body hair,
» and
» » amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…SOMEHOW, in your
» » magic- unsubstantiated, non-backed up claim with absolutely no
» » photographic evidence except for some old mans pictures whose still ass
» » bald but claims he was hair-less(i guess he suffered from alopecia
» totalis
» » eh?), you have convinced yourself that suds=hair loss.
» »
» » WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i lather
» that
» » sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body wash
» big
» » man? Answer me…
»
» Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other harmful
» chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is. Kramer, Diamond Dave and
» even Widowspeak will tell you that the sides and the backs of the hair do
» not get as much shampoo as the tops of the head because most everyone
» starts the lathering process either on the crown or the front temple
» areas. Where does baldness occur first? Either in the crown or the front
» temple areas depending on how you lather your hair with shampoo.
» Coincidence? I think not. Now I consider this case closed but of course I
» will keep the court in session because you non believers will always come
» up with some other excuse to try to debunk Lawrence’s theory. I beg of you
» all to go to GetItBack in mid July and see what almost 11 years of not
» shampooing will do to your hairline when Lawrence unveils his final
» regrowth photos for all the world to see.
You absolute f’ng moron. So somehow eventhough follicles are follicles and SLS is an “ACID” that apparently burns hair right off your head according to you morons, chest and beard hair are immune? So magically the acid is cannot penetrate the forcefield that exists between your beard follicles or chest hair follicles…You clowns are really stretching it. You make no sense whatsoever, have no studies backing up your claims, have not made progress yourselves, have no pictures on that crappy forum except around 3 from 3 years ago which show NO RESULTS…but Cutsinger WILL POST IN JULY! And from there YOU all will magically grow hair as well…I guess anything is possible though with your debunked theories right? Even growing hair magically because some old man posts his pictures. ALL you LOSERS on from that board arent even having succes yourselves LOL…youre clinging to baseless hope.
And yet you nitwits cant fathom that androgen susceptibility in diff follicles is the culprit?
You guys are a joke. Pfft lol at Lawrence Cutsinger’s photos. He is bald as sh*t, has shitty side and back hair that is stringy and thin, and has no pictures to prove that he suffered from alopecia totalis as you clowns claim.
“Everyone knows he was as bald as a cueball” WHOSE everyone you fag…Because the guy said so? So the guy had no side hair and no back hair too right? So he actually does suffer from alopecia totalis…
And LOL at waiting 11 years for regrowth. You losers wait 11 years. I’ll live my life, and so will everyone elses whose hair is holding steady from medication and proper diets. You are a floundering fool…11 YEARS!!! A Decade!!! This is what youre waiting in order to get regrowth that will amazingly be verified in July by Cutsinger.
Noone on that site even believes in it. Ive been there, and there are about 3 posters, you homosexuals who actually still trust in it. You guys are jokes, plain and simple. I’ll see you in 11 years when youre all in your 50’s and still sporting no hair, or some really awesome greasy side and back hair like cutsinger.
» Hangin, it is of my opinion that your hair is not “3 times as thick as it
» was 8 years ago”. Basically I believe you have been bald for over 20 plus
» years that you now look at the hair you have left and feel it is thicker
» than it was in high school but the reality is your hair isn’t thicker.
Hitlerspeak you’re absolutely right about this.
No way Hangin’s side/back hair is 3 times as thick as it was years ago. We all know that.
We know the bald crown Hangin says he has is due to the daily application of shampoo where he begins to lather the shampoo at the crown. This is so easy to see.
For now I’m done trying to talk sense into Hangin and Baabaa.
Like the great educator Rush Limbaugh says:
Never argue with an idiot because it won’t be long before no one can tell which one is the idiot.
» » Yes, witch chazek, an astringent that has a detergent effect. Didn’t
» mean
» » to be impolite, spurious just means false. No emotion attached to it.
» » BTW, even water is technically a detergent!
»
» Witch hazel is a natural astringent and can be used on insect bites, cuts
» and scrapes but to say witch hazel has a detergent effect is a bit of a
» stretch.
» » » » » you fool. Your facial hair continues to grow, as does your body
» » hair,
» » » » and
» » » » » amazingly i use body wash on both of these areas…» »
» » » » » WHY DO I STILL HAVE A THICK BEARD and NICE CHEST HAIR when i
» lather
» » » » that
» » » » » sh*t up…Have you ever read the ingrediants in a bottle of body
» » wash
» » » » big
» » » » » man? Answer me…
» » » »
» » » » Your body hair and chest hair are not sensitive to SLS and other
» » » harmful
» » » » chemicals and shampoos like your head hair is.
» » » Exactly Hitlerspeak…
» » » Thank you for schooling blahblah the clown for me.
» » » He embarrasses himself everytime he posts in an attempt to look
» » » intelligent but it’s not possible for him.
» »
» » where is the scientific theory that your head hair is sensitive to
» shampoo
» » and this makes you go bald
» »
» » you never did explain when I said , why is my side and back hair 3
» times
» » as thick as it was 8 yrs ago, despite continual use of shampoo, as it
» was
» » PAPER THIN in 1999,which according to you ,must have been
» » since I had been using SHAMPOO on it,
» »
» » explain that einstein
»
» Hangin, it is of my opinion that your hair is not “3 times as thick as it
» was 8 years ago”. Basically I believe you have been bald for over 20 plus
» years that you now look at the hair you have left and feel it is thicker
» than it was in high school but the reality is your hair isn’t thicker.
» It’s probably exactly the same if not a little less thicker than high
» school. You just want to feel good about yourself that somehow whatever
» your doing is working. I believe your mind is convinced of this just like
» Widowspeak believes he’s regrowing hair and will appear on Oprah. When you
» compare your hair to your bald spot of course it probably looks pretty damn
» thick next to bald spot.
»
» Do you have any photos to prove your hair is 3 times as thick now vs. 8
» plus years ago? I didn’t think so. Now Hangin’, I know you don’t want to
» hear this but please drop those suds for a few months and who knows maybe
» you’ll get your crown back to it’s original glory. I am not trying to get
» into an argument, this is just my opinion.
» » Hangin, it is of my opinion that your hair is not “3 times as thick as
» it
» » was 8 years ago”. Basically I believe you have been bald for over 20
» plus
» » years that you now look at the hair you have left and feel it is
» thicker
» » than it was in high school but the reality is your hair isn’t thicker.
» Hitlerspeak you’re absolutely right about this.
» No way Hangin’s side/back hair is 3 times as thick as it was years ago. We
» all know that.
»
» We know the bald crown Hangin says he has is due to the daily application
» of shampoo where he begins to lather the shampoo at the crown. This is so
» easy to see.
»
» For now I’m done trying to talk sense into Hangin and Baabaa.
» Like the great educator Rush Limbaugh says:
»
» Never argue with an idiot because it won’t be long before no one can tell
» which one is the idiot.
yes never argue with an idiot, perhaps you should do us all a favor and not subject us to your idiotic theories,
you have like 3 guys on some moronic website that say dont use shampoo and you will grow your hair back
have you grown your hair back? Prove it, show us pics
otherwise you are full of crap , which we all know anyway
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.
Kramer, who told you about this?