» » » if its just a topoff in conjunction with HT why even bother
» » Stating the obvious to those who might have missed it: Because HT + HM
» » will yield more hair than HT alone.
» IF HM works, sure, but you at least know the direction with a HT you dont
» with HM
There’s a very real possibility that direction of HM growth is not a big issue, unless we believe that ICX is a fraud, it’s all a hoax, a conspiracy to steal investors’ money, blah blah blah, etc. etc. etc.
» also you can use body hair to supplement HT nowadays, but its not that
If it’s not that great then you CAN’T use it to supplement HT, not in the general case anyway! It has a slew of limitations and problems (only for very hairy people) and the whole BHT concept was doomed from the start.
» I thought HM was supposed to get a full head of hair, if all it can do is
» SUPPLEMENT a HT then to me it is TOTALLY WORTHLESS
Maybe it’s worthless to you, but not to many, many others. It may be that a HT is needed with HM because it’s difficult to control hair growth precisely enough in HM to form a hairline, but otherwise it’s good at creating hair volume. That’s why the HT + HM talk.
» the reason I would want to get HM …IF IT WORKED, is to AVOID A
» which are a disaster, big ol scars on your head, extremely expensive, need
» to be redone every few years
Because of the substantially increased hair supply due to HM, a HT done with HM won’t suffer from these problems (at least not nearly as much). HT redone every few years, why? Not if you have multiplied hair behind it.