My Story - The Beginning to Alvi Armani

Hair Transplant
41

» »
» » I think the hairline was transplant at something like 80% & then zones 1
» &
» » 2 & 3 have been tranplanted at around 70% ish… I have had no crown
» work
» » yet tho & will have to have that, along with zone 4 in the future from
» » looking at how I look etc.
» »
» » Cheers
» »
» » Dan
»
» Great result from Armani. These numbers always worry me for good reason.
» Even at 70% this means that the donor area taken can only cover 1.3 times
» that area. If the donor is maintained at 70% of the original density as
» well then only 1/4-1/3 of the donor can be taken. This means that the
» balding area can only be about 40% the size of the safe donor area. That
» means that these numbers are only apropriate for some HT candidates. If it
» were myself then I would not have re-bolstered the hairline on the second
» surgery but inclrease the area of coverage, only going back to the hairline
» if there was enough towards the end.
»
» Looking good and would be interested in your thoughts.

marco,makes so much sense!!!..but danuk said earlier in his post that he still has >6000 grafts to spare,after using about 5500 grafts im guessing he has above average donor density,so may be can tame his hairloss in long run!!

42

» » »
» » » I think the hairline was transplant at something like 80% & then zones
» 1
» » &
» » » 2 & 3 have been tranplanted at around 70% ish… I have had no crown
» » work
» » » yet tho & will have to have that, along with zone 4 in the future
» from
» » » looking at how I look etc.
» » »
» » » Cheers
» » »
» » » Dan
» »
» » Great result from Armani. These numbers always worry me for good
» reason.
» » Even at 70% this means that the donor area taken can only cover 1.3
» times
» » that area. If the donor is maintained at 70% of the original density as
» » well then only 1/4-1/3 of the donor can be taken. This means that the
» » balding area can only be about 40% the size of the safe donor area.
» That
» » means that these numbers are only apropriate for some HT candidates. If
» it
» » were myself then I would not have re-bolstered the hairline on the
» second
» » surgery but inclrease the area of coverage, only going back to the
» hairline
» » if there was enough towards the end.
» »
» » Looking good and would be interested in your thoughts.
»
» marco,makes so much sense!!!..but danuk said earlier in his post that he
» still has >6000 grafts to spare,after using about 5500 grafts im guessing
» he has above average donor density,so may be can tame his hairloss in long
» run!!

Is it really true that the hair harvested for hair transplant never ever die?

43

» » Hey everyone,
» »
» » Apologies for not being on the forum for a while, I have had alot of
» » personal issues to deal with over the past few months.
» »
» » I have recently moved house & am awaiting internet connection to be
» » installed, everything is fine with my procedure so far, early signs of
» » growth & its month 4 now so things should be kicking in nicely…
» »
» » As soon as my internet is up & running I will post updated pics etc.
» »
» » Cheers
» »
» » Dan
»
»
» hey. i see you are keeping low profile after your procedure. do you see
» any growth now?
» 6+ months already without no updates.

8+ months… silence.
zero gowth after your 2nd procedure?

44

»
» 8+ months… silence.
» zero gowth after your 2nd procedure?

It’s funny, if someone posts photos that they are happy then that poster must be paid by the clinic. If someone doesn’t post for a while their procedure was a failure and they had no growth. Which is it??

Krapok you have been asking if his result turned out badly since he hit the 4 month mark. Do you know the timeline for growth of a procedure?

45

» »
» » 8+ months… silence.
» » zero gowth after your 2nd procedure?
»
» It’s funny, if someone posts photos that they are happy then that poster
» must be paid by the clinic. If someone doesn’t post for a while their
» procedure was a failure and they had no growth. Which is it??

i haven’t tell anything about this. and it’s just interesting that he started his topic here which were very well documented and it was promising to see here progressive updates by him. but now there has been only silence and no updates at all. if he would be happy then i believe he would share his results to everyone.

» Krapok you have been asking if his result turned out badly since he hit
» the 4 month mark. Do you know the timeline for growth of a procedure?

i pumped this topic up after 4 months, then after 6 months, now after 8 months. and 8 months should be enough time to present his results. don’t you think so?

46

I agree, im too waiting to see his results, he posted pics of his first procedure so why not is second?