» Damon, why are you so sure that HM can help you?
Common sense.This is state of the art science- factual science,not barbaric strip surgery performed by sadists.
We don’t even know how
» well it works.
Yes we do, we know for FACT that the safety trials were able to grow 66 hairs/cm2 without even trying to grow hair. We have even seen the photos.
66 hairs /cm 2 is a better yield then what most clinics can provide & there is no massive trauma to the body as there is with strip surgery.
Most high profile Docs slammed hm, they claimed it would never work. Suddenly their opinions have changed. Now hm’s ability to work is no longer in question by these ‘experts’, only a release date is.
Dr Woods was slammed for FUE, now his critics are claiming to have pioneered his technique. It won’t be long before the critics of hm will claim to have pioneered that as well. People fear change, they are threatened by it.
The hair loss industry is shady, these will hype anything
» just to make a sale, there is no guarantee that HM will work on people who
» have been disfigured by hair transplant.
Yes,it is shady but comparing ICX with the hairloss industry is like comparing Mother Teresa with a x rated porn star. It’s like comparing a Pentium D processor to a Pentium 1.
There are too many positive things I can say about ICX & Dr Kemp but this is not the appropriate forum. Go to the hm forum & read the posts. There are some awesome guys there providing factual info with no financial incentives.
Change is coming.
Dr Kemp & his team are scientists with credible training & education. There work is based on factual science.
Dr Kemp has not made any shameless self-promoting comments. He is very humble & reserved. These are the sort of people to be trusted, not the loud mouth self promoters.
You are going to be disappointed
» if HM doesn’t do what you think it would do
I will only be disappointed if it doesn’t come out soon.
Please direct all other comments on this topic to the hm board.