Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

A request to debate (why USA should have all the monopoly)

A request to debate (why USA should have monopoly). Those who are not aware, ISHRS (so called International society) was and to a large extent remains dominated by USA and is often USA centric.

To say that it is because advances were all made in USA is a fallacy.

They were not.

  1. How many of the total meetings of conference were held in USA? Were any ever held in China, Japan, India etc.?

  2. Why should any member of ishrs have to face the humilation of having to settle for ABHRS (american board of hair restoration) when it should have been IBHRS (International board of hair restoration).

  3. How many of the key positions in the governing board or council are non Caucasian?

The fault may also lie with the members of other nations that they never asserted their rights and indeed the old boy’s club was thus formed with important posts doing a merry go round among select people.
There are more questions and there is need to change this status quo to make it more equitable.

Looking forward to any constructive suggestions on how these societies can be made more just and equitable (right now its like the security council of UN with veto rights in hand of a select few for infinity).
Regards,
Dr. A

Not so much why US dominates but more a question as to why the rest of the world is so willing to bow down to the US. Nothing stops you from starting a non US alliance and compete.

Well, the easy answer is that ‘generally,’ when it comes to worldwide organizations, the United States puts up the overwhelming majority of the funding. The United Nations, World Health Organization, NATO, etc… Who do you think is the money behind these organizations? I’m not saying this is the case with the ISHRS, because I don’t know enough about them. However, you can usually follow the ‘money trail.’

The problem is that when other countries are asked to ‘put up or shut up,’ they usually get quiet really quickly. There is a saying, referred to as the ‘Golden Rule’ and it states: “He who has the gold, Rules!” Again, not saying that is the case with the ISHRS, but if one country is putting up a vast majority of the funding, it’s only natural that they would want to call the shots.

Exactly!

The ISHRS isnt a huge org like the UN or WHO so comparing it to those gigantic orgs isnt fair at all. As a reminder you yourself said you dont know much about ISHRS making your comparison not hold up much water.

@Dr_Arvind are you still doing hair transplants during this pandemic?

I think you’re missing the overriding point. It’s not about the size of the organization - that’s pretty much irrelevant. It’s about who is funding it. There could be 10 people in the organization. If one person is putting up 80% of the funding, then guess who is going to call the shots? It also wasn’t a comparison - it was a ‘truism.’ It’s a pretty simple, time tested, universal truth: Money talks!

I think you’re missing the overriding point. It’s not about the size of the organization - that’s pretty much irrelevant. It’s about who is funding it. There could be 10 people in the organization. If one person is putting up 80% of the funding, then guess who is going to call the shots? It also wasn’t a comparison - it was a ‘truism.’ It’s a pretty simple, time tested, universal truth: Money talks

But you yourself said you dont know much about ISHRS in which case you are not aware of its core funding.

Youre right that your use of big orgs like the UN was not a comparison to ISHRS but until you know for certain what’s behind its funding speculation about its finances should be reserved until verified. Until then the subject matter is subject to just that, speculation.

I agree with you. It was speculation. The point I was trying to make is that with any privately funded organization or association, whoever provides the majority of the funding usually controls it . Is that the case with ISHRS? I have no idea and admitted as much. Maybe Dr. A could answer that.

The issues or questions Dr. Arvind posted in this threadhas nothing to do with monopoly.

Is ISHRS the only organization in the world that does what it does in the hair transplant industry? If the answer is yes, then ok , it is a monopoly.

But that has nothing to do with the questions Dr. Arvind posted such as how many times the conferences were held in the US vs rest of the world. What has that got to do with monopoly?

@Dr_Arvind please clarify the above. What does settling for ABHRS mean? Are ABHRS and IBHRS doing more or less what ISHRS does? There is no monopoly then if these organizations are serving essentially the same market.

Btw, ISHRS isnt a huge org. Its actually very small.

Dr. Arvind,
How many caucasian people are there currently in India or Pakistan government?
Just give us at least one name.

Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Terms of Use & Privacy

This is an advertising site for paid advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.