4,578 graft Fue Megasession with Dr. Armani

Hair Transplant
41

» jrivera3, i think your obsession with Armani is a little weird, almost
» every doctor uses some deceptive photo tricks in their posts at least once,
» Armani is not the only one and will not be the last, it is not acceptable
» but it will probably never change either, get over it!

word

42

» I agree , I have yet to hear an explanation as to why the before pics are
» taken wet. This is a requirement before surgery? I dont think so
»
» To me its very simple
»
» wet before pics make the patient appear MUCH BALDER than dry before pics
»
» Thus the results of the transplant, if they show DRY AFTER PICS…look
» MUCH more dramatic, like the transplant has actually achieved much more
» coverage than it actually did
»
» Lets face it, the balder you look in the before shot, the better it is for
» the clinic. If it was possible to airbrush before hair OUT of the pic,
» without it being discovered , I think this would also be done
»
» For the clinics to make up excuses for their wet before pics , blame the
» patient being late, etc etc to me is not only BS but its laughable
»
» To me there is a calcuated strategy by some clinics to take wet before
» pics. It happens so often that it cannot be a coincidence

guys whatever you think about jrivera3–he having a personel agenda etc etc but imo he and hangin have got very valid points,just cant deny them…and as for patients coming in last min and not having enough time for photodocumentation—sorry even i dont buy it at all…if you dont have good comparable pics,why even bother posting them!!
i dont like these types pics of results because this is exactly what my first doc showed me to trap me into believing her HT skills…im not fingerpointing but you could be better and put a little more effort!

43

and here is an example how misleading it can be when you compare apples to oranges----in these pics for a naive results are there,but are they??

44

» jrivera3, i think your obsession with Armani is a little weird, almost
» every doctor uses some deceptive photo tricks in their posts at least once,
» Armani is not the only one and will not be the last, it is not acceptable
» but it will probably never change either, get over it!

Agreed, I will not be responding to jrivera3’s posts or his attacks on the clinic.

Hanging I did my best to answer your questions, as I am sure you are aware there are very very few cases where the photos are damp in the before photos. Further there are plenty of other results I have posted with dry before photos where I am sure you can see the improvement, even if you cannot in this one :wink:

45

Jrivera,

From reading some of your posts and knowing that you’re fairly new to this forum I clearly understand your agenda and that is to attack the Armani Clinic for unknown reasons. I am one of Dr. Armani’s many patients and all I can tell you is that all this junk that your writing has no meaning when a real patient reads your posts. What puts you in a position to post comments and accusations about a clinic that you have never really experienced?
I came to Dr. Armani NW6 and now I have a head full of hair and their are many pictures of what you call wet/dry or however you want to describe them on this forum to prove that.
I my opinion the only people that can judge whatever pictures and results get posted are the real patients and not someone like you who’s agenda on this forum is to attack and hope to ruin a clinics reputation. We post these pictures to help others and to guide them to the right clinics because if it wasn’t for forum like this and posts of real patients I would have never came across Alvi-Armani.

» » If a patient is running late, depending on staff and Dr. Armani’s
» schedule
» » many things may dictate when photos are taken. This is not an assembly
» » line, we are dealing with real people here and surgery.
» »
» » In a morning where we are prepping a patient for surgery, when the
» photos
» » are being taken is not our main concern. The patient meeting with Dr.
» » Armani to go over final strategy for the procedure, answering all of
» the
» » patients final questions, prepping the patient for surgery is all put
» » before pictures. I am sorry if you do not agree with this.
» »
» » Again, look at all of the results posted on the forum and on our
» website,
» » maybe 5-7% of the photos have a wet or dampened look in the before
» photos.
»
»
» Yes, surgery is not an assembly line… while you’re doing it. But it
» sure as heck is regimented strictly into steps before and after.
»
» I don’t see how the patient being late makes sense, at all, for your
» explanation. If the patient is late, he is late. You will still have to
» take pictures. If you take them before he sees Dr. Armani, or after he
» sees Dr. Armani, the patient is still late, no? So why not always take
» them before he sees Dr. Armani? Taking the pictures after he sees Dr.
» Armani and his hair is wet doesn’t make time slow down…
»
» In addition, I don’t understand what exactly it is that you do differently
» from other respected clinics when “prepping” the patient for surgery, that
» makes you unable to do what they seem able to do: post dry/dry or wet/wet
» before and after photos for an apples to apples comparison. I just don’t
» get it. It makes it look like your clinic is not very well organized.
»
» I agree, asking questions is extremely important, but apples to apples
» comparison photos are extremely important as well, for the patient to
» assess progress, and for potential patients to judge a doctor. If these
» photos weren’t so important, you wouldn’t be posting them.
» So, I don’t agree with you, but you don’t need to be sorry though. I’m
» just trying to figure this all out.
»
» Lastly, where do you get the 5-7% figure of patients with wet before
» pictures? This is really weird. Did you just make this up, or did you
» really calculate it? If you calculated it, why not just say the actual
» number? I truly hope, since you are a hair transplant clinic’s sales
» person/spokesperson/patient rep/what have you, that you are not cavalierly
» throwing around clinical statistics like that, without some sort of
» evidence to support your claim, other than you said so. Research Research
» Research…

46

» Jrivera,
»
» From reading some of your posts and knowing that you’re fairly new to this
» forum I clearly understand your agenda and that is to attack the Armani
» Clinic for unknown reasons. I am one of Dr. Armani’s many patients and all
» I can tell you is that all this junk that your writing has no meaning when
» a real patient reads your posts. What puts you in a position to post
» comments and accusations about a clinic that you have never really
» experienced?

Actually, if you did really read my post, it clearly states what my ‘agenda’ is. And it’s not what you said. So you either didn’t read my post, or you think I’m lying? Which one is it man, just come out and say it. And yet you accuse me of having an “agenda” to attack a clinic’s reputation? You’re pretty much doing the exact same thing to me as what you’re accusing me of. Pretty hypocritical dude.

The “junk” that I post, as you call it, clearly DOES have meaning to a real patient, as hairlove has JUST said I have valid points. So, you are just flat wrong on the facts that can be seen in this very thread.

What puts me in a position to post comments? What the heck? Are you seriously asking me that? Isn’t this a discussion forum?

And what accusations have I made? Can you state them specifically? I doubt it.

» I came to Dr. Armani NW6 and now I have a head full of hair and their are
» many pictures of what you call wet/dry or however you want to describe them
» on this forum to prove that.

Yea, MANY MANY pictures. Like… more than I’ve ever seen one patient post. I think it’s great when patients post pictures. Usually they post updates every month or so for the first year, then move on. But you…man. I’ve never seen someone post so many of his pics to so many forums for so many years. And you think I have an agenda?

» I my opinion the only people that can judge whatever pictures and results
» get posted are the real patients and not someone like you who’s agenda on
» this forum is to attack and hope to ruin a clinics reputation. We post
» these pictures to help others and to guide them to the right clinics
» because if it wasn’t for forum like this and posts of real patients I would
» have never came across Alvi-Armani.
»

Frankly, your opinion is only that, an opinion. You can express it, that’s fine, but I don’t care if you think only patients can judge pictures. You don’t run this forum, right? My opinion is, I think anyone can judge pictures. As far as I’m aware, there’s no rule on this forum against that. So I disagree with your opinion, and really don’t care what you think the rules should be, because you don’t run this forum, thought it sounds like you sure THINK you do. As long as I’m within the rules of the forum, I can post my opinions. Sorry.

You post pictures to “guide” others to the “right” clinics. I’m sorry, this screams agenda. SCREAMS. And it makes me laugh (and cry a little) to see how blind you are, that you actually have the cajones to accuse me of having an “agenda”. Methinks the patient doth protest too much…

47

» » I agree , I have yet to hear an explanation as to why the before pics
» are
» » taken wet. This is a requirement before surgery? I dont think so
» »
» » To me its very simple
» »
» » wet before pics make the patient appear MUCH BALDER than dry before
» pics
» »
» » Thus the results of the transplant, if they show DRY AFTER
» PICS…look
» » MUCH more dramatic, like the transplant has actually achieved much more
» » coverage than it actually did
» »
» » Lets face it, the balder you look in the before shot, the better it is
» for
» » the clinic. If it was possible to airbrush before hair OUT of the pic,
» » without it being discovered , I think this would also be done
» »
» » For the clinics to make up excuses for their wet before pics , blame
» the
» » patient being late, etc etc to me is not only BS but its laughable
» »
» » To me there is a calcuated strategy by some clinics to take wet before
» » pics. It happens so often that it cannot be a coincidence
»
»
» guys whatever you think about jrivera3–he having a personel agenda etc
» etc but imo he and hangin have got very valid points,just cant deny
» them…and as for patients coming in last min and not having
» enough time for photodocumentation—sorry even i dont buy it at
» all…if you dont have good comparable pics,why even bother posting
» them!!
» i dont like these types pics of results because this is exactly what my
» first doc showed me to trap me into believing her HT skills…im not
» fingerpointing but you could be better and put a little more effort!
Well hairlove, if you had a result like the one documented in this thread, you wouldn’t have need a repair in the first place. The pictures here are definitely not ideal, but it definitely shows there is a significant difference. You can check out a lot of pictures in Dr.A’s website (if you want I can give you the exact links), a lot of photos are send by the patients, taken by their cellphone cameras. The pictures are low resolution, and some of them have bad lighting. Does it mean they trying to fool people too? Absolutely not. It easy to throw accusation, but do so after considering the whole scheme of things. If you don’t like the pictures so be it, but many like me can appreciate the improvement in this result. Just because they are not ideal , it doesn’t mean they are trying to be deceptive, they are just trying to present a good result.

48

» Jrivera,
»
» From reading some of your posts and knowing that you’re fairly new to this
» forum I clearly understand your agenda and that is to attack the Armani
» Clinic for unknown reasons. I am one of Dr. Armani’s many patients and all
» I can tell you is that all this junk that your writing has no meaning when
» a real patient reads your posts. What puts you in a position to post
» comments and accusations about a clinic that you have never really
» experienced?
» I came to Dr. Armani NW6 and now I have a head full of hair and their are
» many pictures of what you call wet/dry or however you want to describe them
» on this forum to prove that.
» I my opinion the only people that can judge whatever pictures and results
» get posted are the real patients and not someone like you who’s agenda on
» this forum is to attack and hope to ruin a clinics reputation. We post
» these pictures to help others and to guide them to the right clinics
» because if it wasn’t for forum like this and posts of real patients I would
» have never came across Alvi-Armani.
»

Excuse me but if you were a NW6 nobody can give you a full head of hair, YOU DO NOT have a full head of hair, from a transplant. Transplants do not increase the amount of hairs on your head, at most they rearrange it. At NW6 there is no way in hell you could possibly even hope to achieve the appearance of a full head of hair, much less the real thing. you are delusional
» …

49

» » » I agree , I have yet to hear an explanation as to why the before pics
» » are
» » » taken wet. This is a requirement before surgery? I dont think so
» » »
» » » To me its very simple
» » »
» » » wet before pics make the patient appear MUCH BALDER than dry before
» » pics
» » »
» » » Thus the results of the transplant, if they show DRY AFTER
» » PICS…look
» » » MUCH more dramatic, like the transplant has actually achieved much
» more
» » » coverage than it actually did
» » »
» » » Lets face it, the balder you look in the before shot, the better it
» is
» » for
» » » the clinic. If it was possible to airbrush before hair OUT of the
» pic,
» » » without it being discovered , I think this would also be done
» » »
» » » For the clinics to make up excuses for their wet before pics , blame
» » the
» » » patient being late, etc etc to me is not only BS but its laughable
» » »
» » » To me there is a calcuated strategy by some clinics to take wet
» before
» » » pics. It happens so often that it cannot be a coincidence
» »
» »
» » guys whatever you think about jrivera3–he having a personel agenda etc
» » etc but imo he and hangin have got very valid points,just cant deny
» » them…and as for patients coming in last min and not
» having
» » enough time for photodocumentation—sorry even i dont buy it at
» » all…if you dont have good comparable pics,why even bother
» posting
» » them!!
» » i dont like these types pics of results because this is exactly what my
» » first doc showed me to trap me into believing her HT skills…im not
» » fingerpointing but you could be better and put a little more effort!
» Well hairlove, if you had a result like the one documented in this thread,
» you wouldn’t have need a repair in the first place. The pictures here are
» definitely not ideal, but it definitely shows there is a significant
» difference. You can check out a lot of pictures in Dr.A’s website (if you
» want I can give you the exact links), a lot of photos are send by the
» patients, taken by their cellphone cameras. The pictures are low
» resolution, and some of them have bad lighting. Does it mean they trying to
» fool people too? Absolutely not. It easy to throw accusation, but do so
» after considering the whole scheme of things. If you don’t like the
» pictures so be it, but many like me can appreciate the improvement in this
» result. Just because they are not ideal , it doesn’t mean they are trying
» to be deceptive, they are just trying to present a good result.

first off,i said it was pics like these with wet before and dry after which that doc showed me that tricked me into going to her for my hair transplant…and i was no where comparing my results with the one posted here but i was trying to tell you guys where my opposition to pics like these stem from…so there is no need at all for comparing my results from botched ht with this one.
second,as already stressed in my previous post im not big fan of wet before pics especially when taken by the clinic…i dont ever remember blaming the patient for not so perfect photo-documentation…i totally understand he is not professional but the clinic is.(i have never confronted burberry though i think there is not one good clear pic of his top and crown in a clear lighting from countless pics of his result that have been posted by him,but i really wish he could get his pics from a pro clicked to subdue all the controversy that is associated with his posts…nobody expects a thick head of hair with his level of hair loss and number of transplanted grafts he got…but then i dont blame him for pics because he is the patient)
i hope im able to make a valid point…peace!

50

» » Jrivera,
» »
» » From reading some of your posts and knowing that you’re fairly new to
» this
» » forum I clearly understand your agenda and that is to attack the Armani
» » Clinic for unknown reasons. I am one of Dr. Armani’s many patients and
» all
» » I can tell you is that all this junk that your writing has no meaning
» when
» » a real patient reads your posts. What puts you in a position to post
» » comments and accusations about a clinic that you have never really
» » experienced?
»
» Actually, if you did really read my post, it clearly states what my
» ‘agenda’ is. And it’s not what you said. So you either didn’t read my
» post, or you think I’m lying? Which one is it man, just come out and say
» it. And yet you accuse me of having an “agenda” to attack a clinic’s
» reputation? You’re pretty much doing the exact same thing to me as what
» you’re accusing me of. Pretty hypocritical dude.
»
» The “junk” that I post, as you call it, clearly DOES have meaning to a
» real patient, as hairlove has JUST said I have valid points. So, you are
» just flat wrong on the facts that can be seen in this very thread.

well i saw you and hangin making logical argument so i chimed in…i personally am also against the bad comparision pics stemming from my own experience but am no way trying to say armani ht skills are bad…i dont know that…im not his patient but i expect better pics from them as they are considered top-notch…and this patient pics are far from that!!

51

This is how it read:
» » if you dont have good comparable pics,why even bother
» » posting
This why I pointed to results sent by patients even in Dr.A’s clinic.
» » » i dont like these types pics of results because this is exactly what
» my
» » » first doc showed me to trap me into believing her HT skills
This implies that the intent here is to trap. However, this has more to do with your doctor and nothing do with Dr.Armani. Good know that it was not your intent and I’m glad your cleared up the air.

52

Jrivera you are a brand new poster here and you immediately start questioning Pats, about their morals, the photos they post, the way things are done the morning of the procedure??? Are you kidding?

You have a total of 4 posts and every one of them has done nothing but start arguments. It are psoters like you that ruin this forum. If hairsite is watching this thread I suggest getting rid of this clown.

YOU’RE A JOKE. YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY PAID BY ANOTHER DOCTOR TO BE ON HERE. PEOPLE SEE THRU YOUR MOTIVE.

As for the result itself, I do see a very nice improvement. Dryer before photos would be nice, I agree with Hanging, but the nice result is evident. Too bad this topic has been ruined by Jrivera.

53

» I was questioning 1 thing: why the wet/dry before and after pics? That’s
» not everything.
You assume to know everything that goes in the background, and you’re saying no way this is possible, unless the intent in malicious.
» Er…no. The other reputable clinics do this routinely. When the patient
» is in the doctor’s office, they take dry before pics, so they can make an
» apples to apples comparison. This is easy, and s.o.p., for so many
» reputable clinics. It is far from wishful thinking.
Err… no. A lot of time after pics are from patients. They don’t wear the hair the exact way as before HT. This was more in respone to hannging who keeps complaining, the hair was short before but long after HT.

» This is kind of silly. No one is going to push for a last minute
» appointment that is so last minute that it’s like…literally in one
» minute that they get a surgery. And even if, in some strange world, this
» did actually happen, then there wouldn’t be ANY pictures. But here we have
» pictures. They’re just wet.
Well what silly is you pretending to know everthing. Reputable HT clinics are not in all cities. A lot of times people try to get a pre-op assessment during their business or personal travels. I tried to schedule one such appointment in the last minute, I couldn’t meet with Doctor, but just met with counsular. Since it was after their typical hour of pre-op assessment the photographer was not there, and I DID NOT get shots taken. The protocols followed by Clinics are not universal, it’s just what fits their needs.
» What size or shape the patient is doesn’t have any relevance at all as to
» whether you take a picture of his hair wet or dry.
Figure of speech, that means people are different. Some plan well in advance, so do it in the last second, some are smart, some get $cammed, some are privat, some are open book… what not.
» If the clinic is under-staffed, then…who is taking the pictures with wet
» hair?

» If the supervisor is absent, then…who is taking the pictures with wet
» hair?
Anyone with camera can take photos, sometimes you just do with what you’ve got at the time.
» None of these explanations add up.
If you don’t want to give the benefit of doubt, and call the intention as malicous, nothing will add up. However, I have seen many other Armani pics, and I don’t remember many with wet before pics. I’m more than willing to look at this as a honest mistake, however you’re not.
» I’ve been to the dentist. They always ask if you’ve had x-rays, and if
» you haven’t, they do them. And they do them in a standard way. All the
» dentists I’ve been to take the same set of pictures. What kind of dentists
» are you going to man?
My girlfriend is a dental assistant, when they’re understaffed, she been asked to do many dental prep work for which she has not had complete training. But you know everything!

» Er…no. No one earns a right to make stuff up, I don’t care how many
» posts they make or read. I’m sorry. I’m not saying Pats205 made anything
» up, but so far, he has not provided any evidence showing where he got that
» number. So as far as you and I really know, he could have made those
» numbers up. Again, not saying he did, but where’s the proof? Do you just
» take a salesman’s word for something? If Pats205 provides some kind of
» proof, I’ll apologize to Pats205 on this board for considering the
» possibility that he made the number up, deal?
» I thought anyone could ask questions of any clinic here, no matter when
» they join? Is this not the case? Do I have to make a certain number of
» posts before I can ask a question?
» As I explained, I questioned Pats205 because that was the ONLY thread on
» the page discussing wet before pics, which is a pet peeve of mine. And I
» made a pretty detailed explanation of what my “agenda” is.
» You’re not even “insinuating” anything about me, you’re flat out saying I
» have an agenda…because I’m questioning some one? So does that mean you
» have an “agenda” against me? This could go round and round…
» Find me another thread where someone is posting wet before pics and I’ll
» show you what my agenda is.
Err… no. You’re just assuming he made up the number. An exprienced poster can always put a good ball park number on the posts, but you’re just saying he is making it up, and trying to make him look bad. He is a known entity here, but you’re unknown. You can question people, but do it in polite way, if you come here and post assuming the worst, you’ll have no respect here! You have none my mine, not that it matters.

54

» » I was questioning 1 thing: why the wet/dry before and after pics?
» That’s
» » not everything.
» You assume to know everything that goes in the background, and you’re
» saying no way this is possible, unless the intent in malicious.
» » Er…no. The other reputable clinics do this routinely. When the
» patient
» » is in the doctor’s office, they take dry before pics, so they can make
» an
» » apples to apples comparison. This is easy, and s.o.p., for so many
» » reputable clinics. It is far from wishful thinking.
» Err… no. A lot of time after pics are from patients. They don’t wear
» the hair the exact way as before HT. This was more in respone to hannging
» who keeps complaining, the hair was short before but long after HT.
»
» » This is kind of silly. No one is going to push for a last minute
» » appointment that is so last minute that it’s like…literally in one
» » minute that they get a surgery. And even if, in some strange world,
» this
» » did actually happen, then there wouldn’t be ANY pictures. But here we
» have
» » pictures. They’re just wet.
» Well what silly is you pretending to know everthing. Reputable HT clinics
» are not in all cities. A lot of times people try to get a pre-op assessment
» during their business or personal travels. I tried to schedule one such
» appointment in the last minute, I couldn’t meet with Doctor, but just met
» with counsular. Since it was after their typical hour of pre-op assessment
» the photographer was not there, and I DID NOT get shots taken. The
» protocols followed by Clinics are not universal, it’s just what fits their
» needs.
» » What size or shape the patient is doesn’t have any relevance at all as
» to
» » whether you take a picture of his hair wet or dry.
» Figure of speech, that means people are different. Some plan well in
» advance, so do it in the last second, some are smart, some get $cammed,
» some are privat, some are open book… what not.
» » If the clinic is under-staffed, then…who is taking the pictures with
» wet
» » hair?
»
» » If the supervisor is absent, then…who is taking the pictures with wet
» » hair?
» Anyone with camera can take photos, sometimes you just do with what you’ve
» got at the time.
» » None of these explanations add up.
» If you don’t want to give the benefit of doubt, and call the intention as
» malicous, nothing will add up. However, I have seen many other Armani
» pics, and I don’t remember many with wet before pics. I’m more than willing
» to look at this as a honest mistake, however you’re not.
» » I’ve been to the dentist. They always ask if you’ve had x-rays, and if
» » you haven’t, they do them. And they do them in a standard way. All
» the
» » dentists I’ve been to take the same set of pictures. What kind of
» dentists
» » are you going to man?
» My girlfriend is a dental assistant, when they’re understaffed, she been
» asked to do many dental prep work for which she has not had complete
» training. But you know everything!
»
» » Er…no. No one earns a right to make stuff up, I don’t care how many
» » posts they make or read. I’m sorry. I’m not saying Pats205 made
» anything
» » up, but so far, he has not provided any evidence showing where he got
» that
» » number. So as far as you and I really know, he could have made those
» » numbers up. Again, not saying he did, but where’s the proof? Do you
» just
» » take a salesman’s word for something? If Pats205 provides some kind of
» » proof, I’ll apologize to Pats205 on this board for considering the
» » possibility that he made the number up, deal?
» » I thought anyone could ask questions of any clinic here, no matter when
» » they join? Is this not the case? Do I have to make a certain number
» of
» » posts before I can ask a question?
» » As I explained, I questioned Pats205 because that was the ONLY thread
» on
» » the page discussing wet before pics, which is a pet peeve of mine. And
» I
» » made a pretty detailed explanation of what my “agenda” is.
» » You’re not even “insinuating” anything about me, you’re flat out saying
» I
» » have an agenda…because I’m questioning some one? So does that mean
» you
» » have an “agenda” against me? This could go round and round…
» » Find me another thread where someone is posting wet before pics and
» I’ll
» » show you what my agenda is.
» Err… no. You’re just assuming he made up the number. An exprienced poster always put a good ball park number on the posts, but you’re just saying he is making it up, and trying to make him look bad. He is a known entity here, but you’re unknown. You can question people, but do it in polite way, if you come here post assuming the worst, you’ll have no respect here! You have none my mine, not that it matters.

Agreed, but arvinlexky can’t you see?? This is the point. In 4 posts he has questioned not just the photos like hanging did, he complains about the photos, the clinic, the salesman, calling the armani business unprofessional in his 2nd post? ARE YOU KIDDING ME…

He has one goal here, to ruin this topic and complain about armani. He’s a con artist / a salesman. Frankly its very apparent…

55

having 2 procedures with Dr. Armani I can tell you that this whole argument or debate regarding photos is trivial. The most important facts in this whole discussion are the satisfaction with their procedure. Like Burberry, I’m ecstatic regarding my results that I have gotten with Dr. Armani. Like Pats said, they have no control over how patients want to wear their hair, but if you look at many photographs, including burberry’s, the patients have a buzz cut which shows the extent of their baldness. The after photos give one the idea of how much of a difference there after their procedure. It really comes down to consumer satisfaction, and I myself am a very satisfied consumer.

56

Please ignore Jrivera3. I checked his login details, he is not a genuine poster.

57

» Please ignore Jrivera3. I checked his login details, he is not a genuine
» poster.

What an a$$hole. Anyone doing that to any clinic needs to be b*itchslapped.

Some dudes really have no life off the forums - so pathetically sad :frowning:

58

Awesome results as usual! They speak volumes about the type of work the Armani clinic pumps out on the regular. Thanks for sharing Pats.

Regarding all of the back and forth BS about wet before pics/dry after pics, short hair vs. long hair in the photos, etc., just take a look at my before and after shots. Both taken when hair was dry. These pics/results don’t lie and if you fail to see that you must be partially blind or just ignorant.

All of the negative commentary on this blog should just be overlooked. The only thing that matters is the end RESULT. Why would patients such as myself choose to exploit ourselves on the internet if we were getting negative results? All of these arguments don’t make any sense.

I would be happy to show anyone my results while my hair is wet or dry/long or short. I will even offer to show them in person if you were in my area.

59

» Awesome results as usual! They speak volumes about the type of work the
» Armani clinic pumps out on the regular. Thanks for sharing Pats.
»
» Regarding all of the back and forth BS about wet before pics/dry after
» pics, short hair vs. long hair in the photos, etc., just take a look at my
» before and after shots. Both taken when hair was dry. These pics/results
» don’t lie and if you fail to see that you must be partially blind or just
» ignorant.
»
» All of the negative commentary on this blog should just be overlooked.
» The only thing that matters is the end RESULT. Why would patients such as
» myself choose to exploit ourselves on the internet if we were getting
» negative results? All of these arguments don’t make any sense.
»
» I would be happy to show anyone my results while my hair is wet or
» dry/long or short. I will even offer to show them in person if you were in
» my area.

you had a FUSS procedure not FUE…AND ARMANI does exclusively FUE now…so lots of guys would not be interested in seeing your results if they are considering FUE with armani…again apple to oranges…gosh!!

60

Burberry says: “I came to Dr. Armani NW6 and now I have a head full of hair”

Sorry Bur, you’re either in denial or you’re hiding the truth. Yes, you were an NW6, and I do think your results are decent all things considered. But the fact is, you don’t even have close to a full head of hair. The pictures you show time and time again always, ALWAYS mask the obvious. Your hair is very, obviously thin. You can still see plenty of scalp throughout the top of your head. This is where Pats chimes in and refers us to Burberry’s journal. Or his waterskiing pics. These are useless in showing us the actual results. A close, clear overhead shot in bright conditions would reveal the truth. Do us a favour Burberry and give us one of those for once?