even though val kilmer has all his hair, he sure doesn’t age well, it goes to show that hair is not everything,
before
now
Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free |
even though val kilmer has all his hair, he sure doesn’t age well, it goes to show that hair is not everything,
before
now
woah!
the years have not been kind to him.
he needs to get in shape and get some surgery on that loose skin on his neck.
he is however 51 yrs old so we can cut him some slack.
» woah!
»
» the years have not been kind to him.
In comparison to Tom Selleck - you’re right.
Here’s 37-year-old Tom back in 1982 (left)- and the 63-year-old well-preserved Tom (right) in 2008 at an award show.
You’re right Iron Man.
Do people just don’t care anymore as they get older?
Val Kilmer and John Travolta before
Val kilmer and John Travolta now
» Do people just don’t care anymore as they get older?
Probably after you’ve made money in the movie industry and had kids, you don’t care anymore. Its time to just let it slide.
Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Terms of Use & Privacy |
This is an advertising site for paid advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.