Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Rudy Guiliani


#1

Yes, he really left the house looking like that.


#2

He might enter another House looking indeed a bit different.


#3

» He might enter another House looking indeed a bit different.

he wont win


#4

A pro-choice, gay-friendly, lisping, cross-dressing Republican on marriage number three occupying the White House?

The Republican base has come a long way if they will turn out in numbers for him.
I don’t see that happening.

Unless maybe, Hillary is the opposition.

As for his hair… In general, the 70s was tough on guys with MPB.
Buzzing wasn’t considered hip at the time.

I was only a kid but remember some very strange comb-overs and bad hair systems back then.

Ciao.


#5

» A pro-choice, gay-friendly, lisping, cross-dressing Republican on marriage
» number three occupying the White House?
»
» The Republican base has come a long way if they will turn out in numbers
» for him.
» I don’t see that happening.
»
» Unless maybe, Hillary is the opposition.
»
» As for his hair… In general, the 70s was tough on guys with MPB.
» Buzzing wasn’t considered hip at the time.
»
» I was only a kid but remember some very strange comb-overs and bad hair
» systems back then.
»
» Ciao.

I used to be neutral towazds him till I found out that, he took 2000 boxes of public documents with him when he left the mayors office in New York, and when i recently learned of his pimping of himself as a spokesman of the drug industry and in particular the makers of Oxycontin. How else did he make 50 million dollars since 2001, at which time he was worth less than 10,000 dollars, Now he is worth 50 million.


#6

Yeah, read this too in *** magazine europe. Given the scanty odds the republicans will enjoy for this election, I think they should just gamble this fake guy away. he’ll be beaten as will any other republican candidate and the republicans will be able to come up with a real conservative candidate in 2012 for a real debate to take place. Believe me guys, whether you’re conservative or liberal, the disappearance of the conservative ideology in politics (as is the case in most european countries) results in limp and hollow debates. The US must cling to its partisanship. And Giuliani is not exactly the right recruit.


#7

» Yeah, read this too in *** magazine europe. Given the scanty odds the
» republicans will enjoy for this election, I think they should just gamble
» this fake guy away. he’ll be beaten as will any other republican candidate
» and the republicans will be able to come up with a real conservative
» candidate in 2012 for a real debate to take place. Believe me guys,
» whether you’re conservative or liberal, the disappearance of the
» conservative ideology in politics (as is the case in most european
» countries) results in limp and hollow debates. The US must cling to its
» partisanship. And Giuliani is not exactly the right recruit.

Unfortunately Brm we Americans will have to learn this lesson the hard way. But you’re right… The Democrats have to take control of the White House. Nobody has asked them what they’re going to do to fix everything b/c it really doesn’t matter… they just want “CHANGE”. The problem they fail to consider is that change is a two way street and I can just about bet you that we will be headed down the wrong way… head-on into a Mack truck.


#8

“Change is a two way street and I can just about bet you that we will be headed down the wrong way… head-on into a Mack truck.”

Mack truck #1: Endless war.
Mack truck #2: Help the poor, middle-class and the environment.

Pick your truck.
I’ll take truck #2.

Peace.
:smiley:


#9

The problem with trucks #2 is that their drivers often don’t have their licences.


#10

» “Change is a two way street and I can just about bet you that we will be
» headed down the wrong way… head-on into a Mack truck.”
»
» Mack truck #1: Endless war.
» Mack truck #2: Help the poor, middle-class and the environment.
»
» Pick your truck.
» I’ll take truck #2.

Really? What do you do to help the poor, middle-class and the environment BTW?


#11

In fact, we may of course comprehend the point of our friend Sofarsogood who is a clever and kind guy. But the danger with such policies is nothing else but welfare state which is a direct pass to demagoguery and what we could call “social debt”. In my country, the new president is having a hell of a time to try to only smooth out the deleterious effect of what was once acquired in the name of social justice and that has turned into egoistic privileges to which beneficiaries cling to regardless of the economic liability it is to the nation.


#12

BTW to hark back to Giuliani, if this Obama guy was to be designated by the democrats, and given the wonderful propensity democrats have for self destruction, I am not so sure that a man of “weak consensus” as Giuliani could not in the end make it to the WH… And he knows it perfectly…


#13

» In fact, we may of course comprehend the point of our friend Sofarsogood
» who is a clever and kind guy. But the danger with such policies is nothing
» else but welfare state which is a direct pass to demagoguery and what we
» could call “social debt”. In my country, the new president is having a
» hell of a time to try to only smooth out the deleterious effect of what
» was once acquired in the name of social justice and that has turned into
» egoistic privileges to which beneficiaries cling to regardless of the
» economic liability it is to the nation.

Believe me brm… I understand your point. I lived in Canada for a while and am well aware of the “haves” and “have-nots”. They seem to be directly correlated to the “do’s” and “do-nothings” Lets face it… socialism at any level is doomed for failure.


#14

We have plenty of “do-nothings” here in the USA.

There is a balance between unbridled Capitalism and unbridled Socialism.

“Endless war” is off the table for me.

Get the terrorists.
The rest is BS, IMO.

Happy New Year!


#15

»»
» Get the terrorists.
» The rest is BS, IMO.

Whats your plan… that would be politically correct of course?


#16

US Special Forces could be deployed to break up terror cells worldwide.

NOT using the National Guard to occupy other peoples’ counties.

Peace.


#17

» US Special Forces could be deployed to break up terror cells worldwide.
»
» NOT using the National Guard to occupy other peoples’ counties.
»
» Peace.

Just how many Special Forces do you anticipate we would need to break up every terror cell on this whole friggin planet? Lets be a little bit realistic here… we’re America we’re not magicians.


#18

Special Forces could CRUSH one terror cell at a time.

The radicals don’t have armies or thousands of warriors dug-in in one place to fight us toe-to-toe.

Armed manless drones, Special Forces and Air Power.
That’s all we need to defeat those radical freaks, IMO.
One cell at a time.

Special Forces could also find and kill Bin Laden.
Instead we “outsourced” the hunt for UBL and invaded Iraq, a secular Muslim nation. Now the Taliban is back in Afghanistan.
Now Iraq is becoming an “Islamic State”.
Most women were better off under Saddam.
How lame is that???
Heck of a job Bushit & Co.

BRING THE NATIONAL GUARD HOME NOW!
They didn’t sign up for this BS.
They should be guarding our “Homeland”.

Occupying Iraq is making millions of people hate us all over the globe.
People that didn’t hate us before bombs dropped on their homes and their water/power was cut off now side with the terrorists.

Some people, IMO, don’t want terror to be defeated.
They want Boogie Men to scare us with, endless war profits and geopolitical “influence” in the Middle East (and elsewhere).

That, IMHO, is immoral and UN-AMERICAN and certainly not Christian values.
I agree with Ron Paul on that! Lol.

Just my opinion MPB.

Happy New Year!


#19

» Special Forces could CRUSH one terror cell at a time.
»
» The radicals don’t have armies or thousands of warriors dug-in in one
» place to fight us toe-to-toe.
»
» Armed manless drones, Special Forces and Air Power.
» That’s all we need to defeat those radical freaks, IMO.
» One cell at a time.
»
» Special Forces could also find and kill Bin Laden.
» Instead we “outsourced” the hunt for UBL and invaded Iraq, a secular
» Muslim nation. Now the Taliban is back in Afghanistan.
» Now Iraq is becoming an “Islamic State”.
» Most women were better off under Saddam.
» How lame is that???
» Heck of a job Bushit & Co.
»
» BRING THE NATIONAL GUARD HOME NOW!
» They didn’t sign up for this BS.
» They should be guarding our “Homeland”.
»
» Occupying Iraq is making millions of people hate us all over the globe.
» People that didn’t hate us before bombs dropped on their homes and their
» water/power was cut off now side with the terrorists.
»
» Some people, IMO, don’t want terror to be defeated.
» They want Boogie Men to scare us with, endless war profits and
» geopolitical “influence” in the Middle East (and elsewhere).
»
» That, IMHO, is immoral and UN-AMERICAN and certainly not Christian
» values.
» I agree with Ron Paul on that! Lol.
»
» Just my opinion MPB.
»
» Happy New Year!

Happy New Year back at ya Sofar!


#20

» Special Forces could CRUSH one terror cell at a time.
»
» The radicals don’t have armies or thousands of warriors dug-in in one
» place to fight us toe-to-toe.
»
» Armed manless drones, Special Forces and Air Power.
» That’s all we need to defeat those radical freaks, IMO.
» One cell at a time.
»
» Special Forces could also find and kill Bin Laden.
» Instead we “outsourced” the hunt for UBL and invaded Iraq, a secular
» Muslim nation. Now the Taliban is back in Afghanistan.
» Now Iraq is becoming an “Islamic State”.
» Most women were better off under Saddam.
» How lame is that???
» Heck of a job Bushit & Co.
»
» BRING THE NATIONAL GUARD HOME NOW!
» They didn’t sign up for this BS.
» They should be guarding our “Homeland”.
»
» Occupying Iraq is making millions of people hate us all over the globe.
» People that didn’t hate us before bombs dropped on their homes and their
» water/power was cut off now side with the terrorists.
»
» Some people, IMO, don’t want terror to be defeated.
» They want Boogie Men to scare us with, endless war profits and
» geopolitical “influence” in the Middle East (and elsewhere).
»
» That, IMHO, is immoral and UN-AMERICAN and certainly not Christian
» values.
» I agree with Ron Paul on that! Lol.
»
» Just my opinion MPB.
»
» Happy New Year!

explain how special forces can hunt down Bin Laden In Afghanistan when the govt of that country is protecting him, as well as the local tribesmen in those cave areas