Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Matthew Mcconaughey - What Did He Do?


#1

So the guy was a solid NW 3-4 about two years ago. Now he has a full head of hair again. Letterman called him out on it, but he didn’t really give an answer except to say something about a drug. Wig? Plugs? If its plugs, he’s got a great doc.


#2

» So the guy was a solid NW 3-4 about two years ago. Now he has a full head
» of hair again. Letterman called him out on it, but he didn’t really give
» an answer except to say something about a drug. Wig? Plugs? If its
» plugs, he’s got a great doc.

Excellent transplants with a whole lot of thickeners and concealers. He’s had probably more than one procedure done. He actually made two or three films years back with a shaved head. That’s probably when he got the work done. He looks amazing in film and in print. But I saw him at a football game once and his hair looked like shit. Really thin and completely see thru. I’ll see if I can find the pic.


#3

» » So the guy was a solid NW 3-4 about two years ago. Now he has a full
» head
» » of hair again. Letterman called him out on it, but he didn’t really
» give
» » an answer except to say something about a drug. Wig? Plugs? If its
» » plugs, he’s got a great doc.
»
»
» Excellent transplants with a whole lot of thickeners and concealers.
» He’s had probably more than one procedure done. He actually made two or
» three films years back with a shaved head. That’s probably when he got
» the work done. He looks amazing in film and in print. But I saw him at
» a football game once and his hair looked like shit. Really thin and
» completely see thru. I’ll see if I can find the pic.

His hair - in movies and print, at least - is indeed amazing. Not a hint of loss at all. I’m shocked that the tabloids haven’t hounded him on this miraculous transformation. I wonder who his doc is.


#4

» » » So the guy was a solid NW 3-4 about two years ago. Now he has a full
» » head
» » » of hair again. Letterman called him out on it, but he didn’t really
» » give
» » » an answer except to say something about a drug. Wig? Plugs? If its
» » » plugs, he’s got a great doc.
» »
» »
» » Excellent transplants with a whole lot of thickeners and concealers.
» » He’s had probably more than one procedure done. He actually made two
» or
» » three films years back with a shaved head. That’s probably when he got
» » the work done. He looks amazing in film and in print. But I saw him
» at
» » a football game once and his hair looked like shit. Really thin and
» » completely see thru. I’ll see if I can find the pic.
»
» His hair - in movies and print, at least - is indeed amazing. Not a hint
» of loss at all. I’m shocked that the tabloids haven’t hounded him on this
» miraculous transformation. I wonder who his doc is.

i just saw him on letterman, his hair looks ridiculous, not good at all

the temples are receding way too much to be unnoticeable, and he has not had them transplanted so it looks very obvious

the hair on the top front is semi see through, and if you look closely it looks like about half of 70 percent of it is gone

then he has these weird red areas in the hairline that almost look recently transplanted

bizarre

if his temples keep receding the way they are, he will look ridiculous in a few years


#5

Extensive hair transplants + hairpieces/extensions in certain high-profile appearances and movie shoots.

That’s all it takes.

There is nothing about the various appearances of his hair regrowth in the past several years that cannot be explained by a combination of those two things.


#6

» Extensive hair transplants + hairpieces/extensions in certain high-profile
» appearances and movie shoots.
»
» That’s all it takes.
»
» There is nothing about the various appearances of his hair regrowth in the
» past several years that cannot be explained by a combination of those two
» things.

he certinally has had something done… whatever it is , it looks great…

good for letterman to call him out on it…


#7

» » Extensive hair transplants + hairpieces/extensions in certain
» high-profile
» » appearances and movie shoots.
» »
» » That’s all it takes.
» »
» » There is nothing about the various appearances of his hair regrowth in
» the
» » past several years that cannot be explained by a combination of those
» two
» » things.
»
» he certinally has had something done… whatever it is , it looks
» great…
»
» good for letterman to call him out on it…

looks great?

you need new glasses


#8

It looks great sometimes, and somewhat weak at other times.

His best-looking hair shots that he is capable of showing in movies & public appearances these days are definitely not what he has growing on his head 24/7. That much is clear.

But he’s also not using the perfect hairpieces or whatever for 100% of the time because there’s still too many cases of him looking thin & short in public.

Which makes it sound all the more likely to me that he is using a combination. He probably has a lot of HTs, and also adds some entensions to his hair/wears a hairpiece depending on the situation.


#9

» It looks great sometimes, and somewhat weak at other times.
»
» His best-looking hair shots that he is capable of showing in movies &
» public appearances these days are definitely not what he has growing on
» his head 24/7. That much is clear.
»
» But he’s also not using the perfect hairpieces or whatever for 100% of the
» time because there’s still too many cases of him looking thin & short in
» public.
»
» Which makes it sound all the more likely to me that he is using a
» combination. He probably has a lot of HTs, and also adds some entensions
» to his hair/wears a hairpiece depending on the situation.

he must be losing his hair very quickly, even on letterman his temples looked bad and the front top was weak looking and depending on the camera angle, almost see through…and this was after plugs, or wigs or watever he is using

hes in bad shape


#10

I think he’s just got a more receeded temple hairline with the actual transplants than with the 'pieces he wears.


#11

»
» he must be losing his hair very quickly, even on letterman his temples
» looked bad and the front top was weak looking and depending on the camera
» angle, almost see through…and this was after plugs, or
» wigs or watever he is using
»
» hes in bad shape

so, i guess ‘bad shape’ means that he’s still considered one of the sexiest man on this planet? let’s not get to critical here…there is more to a man than hair…good for matthew McC for doing what he can…


#12

» »
» » he must be losing his hair very quickly, even on letterman his
» temples
» » looked bad and the front top was weak looking and depending on the
» camera
» » angle, almost see through…and this was after plugs,
» or
» » wigs or watever he is using
» »
» » hes in bad shape
»
» so, i guess ‘bad shape’ means that he’s still considered one of the
» sexiest man on this planet? let’s not get to critical here…there is more
» to a man than hair…good for matthew McC for doing what he can…

I Am referring to his hair when i say he is in bad shape
he could be the most popular sexiest richest guy in the world, that is not what we are talking about, we are discussing his hair


#13

you stated, “hes in bad shape” which indicates him, not simply his hair… too many ppl are obsessed with their hair loss on this site… there is more than hair that makes a man… someone i get the feeling that some here feel that others with hair loss (even if they try to cover it up) that are successful don’t deserve it…

most ppl here need a psychologist ,not a hair cure!

» » »
» » » he must be losing his hair very quickly, even on letterman his
» » temples
» » » looked bad and the front top was weak looking and depending on the
» » camera
» » » angle, almost see through…and this was after
» plugs,
» » or
» » » wigs or watever he is using
» » »
» » » hes in bad shape
» »
» » so, i guess ‘bad shape’ means that he’s still considered one of the
» » sexiest man on this planet? let’s not get to critical here…there is
» more
» » to a man than hair…good for matthew McC for doing what he can…
»
» I Am referring to his hair when i say he is in bad shape
» he could be the most popular sexiest richest guy in the world, that is not
» what we are talking about, we are discussing his hair


#14

» you stated, “hes in bad shape” which indicates him, not simply his hair…
» too many ppl are obsessed with their hair loss on this site… there is
» more than hair that makes a man… someone i get the feeling that some
» here feel that others with hair loss (even if they try to cover it up)
» that are successful don’t deserve it…
»
» most ppl here need a psychologist ,not a hair cure!
»
»
» » » »
» » » » he must be losing his hair very quickly, even on letterman his
» » » temples
» » » » looked bad and the front top was weak looking and depending on the
» » » camera
» » » » angle, almost see through…and this was after
» » plugs,
» » » or
» » » » wigs or watever he is using
» » » »
» » » » hes in bad shape
» » »
» » » so, i guess ‘bad shape’ means that he’s still considered one of the
» » » sexiest man on this planet? let’s not get to critical here…there is
» » more
» » » to a man than hair…good for matthew McC for doing what he can…
» »
» » I Am referring to his hair when i say he is in bad shape
» » he could be the most popular sexiest richest guy in the world, that is
» not
» » what we are talking about, we are discussing his hair

when i stated …he is in bad shape…I talked about his hair 100 percent of the post, so why would you think I was talking about anything other than his hair? You think I was talking about his physical conditioning? his finances? what?

However , despite what we know that hair does not make the man, I guarantee his status as a hollywood hunk, would be in jeapordy without his hair. Not too many guys make the best looking list, that are losing their hair. Go down the top 10 in the peoples most beautiful list and tell me how many of those guys are bald or thinning. When mel gibson made the cover he had a thick shock of hair, then we have tom cruise, Brad Pitt, Leonardo De Caprio etc etc all thick haired guys

this is a site for hair loss , in case you did not notice

I have posted many posts saying, hair does not make the man, it wont get you girls, it wont make you a chick magnet

women care much more about a mans wallet, fidelity, whether he is not a drug and alcohol abuser, about his heart ,etc , than they do his hair

that is unless they are in their late teens early 20s, then they are focused on looks, as are most men

I agree most guys on this site are obsessed with hair and think getting more will make you successful in life

I have posted more on this issue , that it wont make that much difference, that we care about our hairloss much more than others care about it, more than any poster on the board


#15

For once I’m with Hangin.

In the context of the conversation, “bad shape” was obviously referring his hair and not his whole self.


#16

the guy just got married to a brazillian model, obviously she doesn’t care…with enough $$$ and if you look decent you can have any woman you want so who cares.