Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Intercytex results to be announced in September


#1

Intercytex will announce interim results in September.

How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare myself to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what I say, or rot in hairloss hell.

Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This information is there if you dig around. :smiley:

The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!

Good Day.


#2

» Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
»
» How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare myself
» to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what I
» say, or rot in hairloss hell.
»
» Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This information
» is there if you dig around. :smiley:
»
» The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
»
» Good Day.

What an easy find.
See link
http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/events/


#3

» Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
»
» How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare myself
» to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what I
» say, or rot in hairloss hell.
»
» Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This information
» is there if you dig around. :smiley:
»
» The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
»
» Good Day.

yeah once again, middle of 2007 means september for intercytex (and to be correct, that most probably means end of september). I would not be surprised at all if no TRC results were disclosed before then. they never learn. if they told us truth in the first place, their stock would not be so low as it is now. they always give too optimistic schedules. and the weirdest thing is that the guy who does these mistakes again and again still has not apparently been fired. weird. this simple mistake cost their stock millions already.

it is better to give worse prediction of some achievement, and then correct it to better one, than to give over optimistic date, and never be able to keep up with it. I mean you don’t have to be an Einstein to know that ICX announcement of some milestone is not going to happen. So if we (and apparently investors) noticed this pattern, why icx did not? why don’t they adjust their dates to some more realistic ones? It is not so hard, just make up the date as ususal, and use some historical date announcement and real length it took to achieve the goal to compute the factor you need to multiply the new prediction with. Multiplication is taught on basic schools! Everyone can do it, so why ICX cannot?

I’d be very surprised if they announced anything big before sep 2007 even thogh they have been promising half of the year (which is end of june or begining of july, not 30th of september)

The only thing that keeps my hopes up is positive phase I. so hopefuly, the scientists are better than their management.

And also there is always a probability that someone will buy the company and change the management. I almost wish this became true.


#4

» I mean you don’t have to be an Einstein to know
» that ICX announcement of some milestone is not going to happen.


#5

debris, calm down.
by March 23, 6 trialists had already been injected.
This means that 3 months later, by June 23, new hair will begin to appear on these trialists.
Until September, ICX will have 2 months for monitoring the growth (rate of growth, direction, colour, caliper, etc)of the new hair, and take a sequence of photos.
Also, the remaining 3 guys of the cohort will start to sprout hair too.

By September, they will have quite comprehensive results of the full cohort (9 guys).

So it is better that the results are presented on September than before. They will be more complete.

Still, note that this report (Interim Results) is not specific for TRC, but for the complete range of products.


#6

I think this is referring to financial results.


#7

» I think this is referring to financial results.

Last years results - to get idea!

See link
http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/rep/2006-09-21a/2006-09-21a.pdf


#8

» » I think this is referring to financial results.
»
» Last years results - to get idea!
»
» See link
» http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/rep/2006-09-21a/2006-09-21a.pdf

These reports usually contain very resumed info. Expect just a couple of lines of text. But could be very significant.


#9

» » » I think this is referring to financial results.
» »
» » Last years results - to get idea!
» »
» » See link
» » http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/rep/2006-09-21a/2006-09-21a.pdf
»
» These reports usually contain very resumed info. Expect just a couple of
» lines of text. But could be very significant.

  1. When will the Phase II trial be completed?
    It is a rolling trial which will optimise the formulation and delivery as well as studying safety and efficacy. We expect some data will become available during 2007. We anticipate the current trial will complete during 2008.

See Link
http://www.intercytex.com/icx/products/aesthetic/icxtrc/faqsicxtrc/


#10

During his monthly visit to the corner barbershop,this fellow asked his barber for any suggestions on how to treat his increasing baldness.
After a brief pause,the barber leaned over & confided that the best thing he’d come across was,er,female juices.
“But you’re balder than I am,” protested the customer.
“True,” admitted the barber, “but you’ve gotta admit I’ve got 1 hell of a mustache!”


#11

» 4. When will the Phase II trial be completed?
» It is a rolling trial which will optimise the formulation and delivery as
» well as studying safety and efficacy. We expect some data will become
» available during 2007. We anticipate the current trial will complete
» during 2008.
»
» See Link
» http://www.intercytex.com/icx/products/aesthetic/icxtrc/faqsicxtrc/

well, if the 1st cohort is going to take at least 9 months, and there is going to be several cohorts, I think phase II will take quite long. I will be very surprised if they complete it in 2008. The question is how many cohorts will they need to get decent results.

But note that the longer TRC takes to reach the market, the safer it will be. Because there will be more side-effects information from the first trialists.


#12

It’s premature to even have a HM forum let alone a HM product.


#13

» During his monthly visit to the corner barbershop,this fellow asked his
» barber for any suggestions on how to treat his increasing baldness.
» After a brief pause,the barber leaned over & confided that the best thing
» he’d come across was,er,female juices.
» “But you’re balder than I am,” protested the customer.
» “True,” admitted the barber, “but you’ve gotta admit I’ve got 1 hell of a
» mustache!”

the barber got it wrong. He took the medicine orally instead of applying it topically on the scalp.


#14

» » Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
» »
» » How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare
» myself
» » to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what
» I
» » say, or rot in hairloss hell.
» »
» » Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This
» information
» » is there if you dig around. :smiley:
» »
» » The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
» »
» » Good Day.
»
»
» yeah once again, middle of 2007 means september for intercytex (and to be
» correct, that most probably means end of september). I would not be
» surprised at all if no TRC results were disclosed before then. they never
» learn. if they told us truth in the first place, their stock would not be
» so low as it is now. they always give too optimistic schedules. and the
» weirdest thing is that the guy who does these mistakes again and again
» still has not apparently been fired. weird. this simple mistake cost their
» stock millions already.
»
» it is better to give worse prediction of some achievement, and then
» correct it to better one, than to give over optimistic date, and never be
» able to keep up with it. I mean you don’t have to be an Einstein to know
» that ICX announcement of some milestone is not going to happen. So if we
» (and apparently investors) noticed this pattern, why icx did not? why
» don’t they adjust their dates to some more realistic ones? It is not so
» hard, just make up the date as ususal, and use some historical date
» announcement and real length it took to achieve the goal to compute the
» factor you need to multiply the new prediction with. Multiplication is
» taught on basic schools! Everyone can do it, so why ICX cannot?
»
» I’d be very surprised if they announced anything big before sep 2007 even
» thogh they have been promising half of the year (which is end of june or
» begining of july, not 30th of september)
»
» The only thing that keeps my hopes up is positive phase I. so hopefuly,
» the scientists are better than their management.
»
» And also there is always a probability that someone will buy the company
» and change the management. I almost wish this became true.

i dont know if it hits the nail what you write. i guess you have knowledge about business to make posts like this?

for me i see it this way… its complicate. i dont know enough to say if a fault or not, but again its very complicate and dont think that the management is stupid.

thats all i can about your post.


#15

If ICX, and Dr. Kemp, are wondering why some investors are a little cool, and message boards a little dreary regarding their product, its this:

IF your a research company, you should state we intend to start a trial on this date, X.

The trial will last until this date, Y.

We will release results from this trial on this date, Z.

AND STICK TO IT DAMMIT>!!!

IF ICX had shot up guys with their best protocol last September, when we were all led to believe they did, the trialees would have either had success by now, or not. But we would KNOW it if ICX released the information.

They could have said, “hey 5 trialees grew some pretty signifigant hair, 5 so-so hair, and 5 had no response”. Then we’d know that they have a product that works for some, a little for others, and zilch for some. So it needs further work.

However, when we find out that instead of 20 men got shot up, only 9 did, and in groups of 3 on different dates, and the website hasn’t even been changed to reflect this, you feel mislead.

And Adearans, fucck dont even get me started on them.


#16

» Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
»
» How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare myself
» to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what I
» say, or rot in hairloss hell.
»
» Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This information
» is there if you dig around. :smiley:
»
» The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
»
» Good Day.

oh goodie


#17

» » Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
» »
» » How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare
» myself
» » to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what
» I
» » say, or rot in hairloss hell.
» »
» » Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This
» information
» » is there if you dig around. :smiley:
» »
» » The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
» »
» » Good Day.
»
»
» yeah once again, middle of 2007 means september for intercytex (and to be
» correct, that most probably means end of september). I would not be
» surprised at all if no TRC results were disclosed before then. they never
» learn. if they told us truth in the first place, their stock would not be
» so low as it is now. they always give too optimistic schedules. and the
» weirdest thing is that the guy who does these mistakes again and again
» still has not apparently been fired. weird. this simple mistake cost their
» stock millions already.
»
» it is better to give worse prediction of some achievement, and then
» correct it to better one, than to give over optimistic date, and never be
» able to keep up with it. I mean you don’t have to be an Einstein to know
» that ICX announcement of some milestone is not going to happen. So if we
» (and apparently investors) noticed this pattern, why icx did not? why
» don’t they adjust their dates to some more realistic ones? It is not so
» hard, just make up the date as ususal, and use some historical date
» announcement and real length it took to achieve the goal to compute the
» factor you need to multiply the new prediction with. Multiplication is
» taught on basic schools! Everyone can do it, so why ICX cannot?
»
» I’d be very surprised if they announced anything big before sep 2007 even
» thogh they have been promising half of the year (which is end of june or
» begining of july, not 30th of september)
»
» The only thing that keeps my hopes up is positive phase I. so hopefuly,
» the scientists are better than their management.
»
» And also there is always a probability that someone will buy the company
» and change the management. I almost wish this became true.

yes it makes them seem more honest if they give a realistic date…that is if they even know this…but what investors want to invest in a product which will be coming out in 10 yrs…NOBODY

investors want quick return on their investment, anything over 2 yrs and they start getting nervous…tell them the real story and the investment dollars will up faster than the african desert in the dry season


#18

» » » Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
» » »
» » » How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare
» » myself
» » » to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in
» what
» » I
» » » say, or rot in hairloss hell.
» » »
» » » Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This
» » information
» » » is there if you dig around. :smiley:
» » »
» » » The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
» » »
» » » Good Day.
» »
» »
» » yeah once again, middle of 2007 means september for intercytex (and to
» be
» » correct, that most probably means end of september). I would not be
» » surprised at all if no TRC results were disclosed before then. they
» never
» » learn. if they told us truth in the first place, their stock would not
» be
» » so low as it is now. they always give too optimistic schedules. and the
» » weirdest thing is that the guy who does these mistakes again and again
» » still has not apparently been fired. weird. this simple mistake cost
» their
» » stock millions already.
» »
» » it is better to give worse prediction of some achievement, and then
» » correct it to better one, than to give over optimistic date, and never
» be
» » able to keep up with it. I mean you don’t have to be an Einstein to
» know
» » that ICX announcement of some milestone is not going to happen. So if
» we
» » (and apparently investors) noticed this pattern, why icx did not? why
» » don’t they adjust their dates to some more realistic ones? It is not so
» » hard, just make up the date as ususal, and use some historical date
» » announcement and real length it took to achieve the goal to compute the
» » factor you need to multiply the new prediction with. Multiplication is
» » taught on basic schools! Everyone can do it, so why ICX cannot?
» »
» » I’d be very surprised if they announced anything big before sep 2007
» even
» » thogh they have been promising half of the year (which is end of june
» or
» » begining of july, not 30th of september)
» »
» » The only thing that keeps my hopes up is positive phase I. so hopefuly,
» » the scientists are better than their management.
» »
» » And also there is always a probability that someone will buy the
» company
» » and change the management. I almost wish this became true.
»
» yes it makes them seem more honest if they give a realistic
» date…that is if they even know this…but what
» investors want to invest in a product which will be coming out in 10
» yrs…NOBODY
»
» investors want quick return on their investment, anything over 2 yrs and
» they start getting nervous…tell them the real story and the
» investment dollars will up faster than the african desert in the dry
» season

so this person you are referring to who keeps making this “mistake”…its called fudging the numbers , its also called fraud


#19

»
» so this person you are referring to who keeps making this
» “mistake”…its called fudging the numbers , its also called fraud

I am confident that it is not a fraud. just plain incompetence. no one with brain would like to undermine credibility of his own comapany.


#20

» Intercytex will announce interim results in September.
»
» How do I know this? I’m TheGayme. I’m a hairloss GOD. I compare myself
» to Jesus. Listen to me my hairloss desciples, have blind faith in what I
» say, or rot in hairloss hell.
»
» Or perhaps I just found this information on their site. This information
» is there if you dig around. :smiley:
»
» The great and powerful Gayme has spoken!
»
» Good Day.

Just to clarify matters, what you’re talking about here is a financial statement which is unlikely to make reference to HM at all except in such general terms that we learn nothing new of the company’s HM efforts.

On the other hand, as far as I’m aware, Intercytex should be providing data within the next month or two of their ongoing clinical trials. I am sure they will do so. The reason for my optimism is simple: they have committed themselves to no more than simply supplying data obtained to date. The issue of having to await results, holding out for a favourable outcome etc does not arise.

Regards,
Facts 21