I know very little about in vitro HM, but here’s my question: If the multiplication procedure is the same (or very similiar) to ICX-TRC and the only difference between the standard protocol of ICX-TRC and the “in vitro” method is the medium in which the cells are grown, then would they have to go through the entire regulatory process, or would there be a shorter path to commercialisation?
(As I said: I know very little about the “in vitro” method, and I am sure there are lots of differences between the two protocols, but if the two procedures are essentially the same, would this be taken into consideration by the regulatory bodies?)
» I know very little about in vitro HM, but here’s my question: If the
» multiplication procedure is the same (or very similiar) to ICX-TRC and the
» only difference between the standard protocol of ICX-TRC and the “in vitro”
» method is the medium in which the cells are grown, then would they have to
» go through the entire regulatory process, or would there be a shorter path
» to commercialisation?
» (As I said: I know very little about the “in vitro” method, and I am sure
» there are lots of differences between the two protocols, but if the two
» procedures are essentially the same, would this be taken into
» consideration by the regulatory bodies?)
The in vitro method involves the use of different cell combinations, growth factors, and delivery methods. I believe it would require further trials. But the trials could go faster if it works well right off the bat. Don’t quote me on it though. To me, this does not appear to be a short-term solution.
IMHO if they use different trials in this new product will be because they do not know procedure results and they need a legal base to experiment with humans.
The only thing I could not understand about this moronic company is that they are EXPENDING MONEY in trials when a lot of us WILL PAY THEM MONEY to participate.
Kemp & Cia could be genious HM researchers but are absolutely pathetic CEOs, thats because ICX.L was at 46p yesterday when thousand of people are in the forums ready to be injected.
Is pathetic.
» IMHO if they use different trials in this new product will be because they
» do not know procedure results and they need a legal base to experiment
» with humans.
»
» The only thing I could not understand about this moronic company is that
» they are EXPENDING MONEY in trials when a lot of us WILL PAY THEM MONEY to
» participate.
»
» Kemp & Cia could be genious HM researchers but are absolutely pathetic
» CEOs, thats because ICX.L was at 46p yesterday when thousand of people are
» in the forums ready to be injected.
»
» Is pathetic.
I think that the in vitro tech trials will be more fast than TRC, because they need only to see if the hair is like a normal hair in all parts, and after this they have to implant this with a transplant, a techinque already tested…
Maybe they need only a trial about safety, and one to see if the hair grow again like the normal cycle of the natural hairs…