Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

ICX prelimirary results 18th March 2008


#1

http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/events/


#2

» http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/events/

Nice… finally we can do an X on the calendar :stuck_out_tongue:

But i don’t like that these are Preliminary Results… they didn’t say that in march we can have the final results of the first cohorts of the phase2?? Am i wrong??


#3

NEVER EVER, to my memory, the Hair agenda has been so BUSY …its so refreshing to live these moments !


#4

» NEVER EVER, to my memory, the Hair agenda has been so BUSY …its so
» refreshing to live these moments !

First time posting, thought this might help.

ICX-TRC

ICX-TRC is a novel hair regeneration product. It consists of a suspension of autologous dermal papilla (DP) cells. These cells are able to stimulate the generation of new hairs when injected into the scalp in close proximity to the epithelial cells which generate the hair.

In September this year we announced the first results from the current Phase II trial. In the sub-group of subjects (5 in total) whose scalp was pre-stimulated at the time of injection all subjects showed substantial and visible increased hair counts at 6 and/or 12 weeks (13-105%). We believe this increased hair production is attributable to the interaction between the injected DP cells and the stimulated resident hair producing cells.

A further 5 subjects have now been treated with ICX-TRC using the pre-stimulation technique with 2 more expected in January. By the end of March 2008 we expect to announce preliminary 12 week data on up to 16 subjects in total and preliminary 24 week data on up to 10 subjects


#5

so we can except some pictures in march or the preliminary retuls wont release pics?


#6

Hey dude!

This is the Preliminary financial result not the results of a clinical trial…

But for sure they will talk about their pipeline.

» » http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/events/
»
» Nice… finally we can do an X on the calendar :stuck_out_tongue:
»
» But i don’t like that these are Preliminary Results… they didn’t
» say that in march we can have the final results of the first cohorts of
» the phase2?? Am i wrong??


#7

» Hey dude!
»
» This is the Preliminary financial result not the results of a clinical
» trial…
»
» But for sure they will talk about their pipeline.
»
» » » http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/events/
» »
» » Nice… finally we can do an X on the calendar :stuck_out_tongue:
» »
» » But i don’t like that these are Preliminary Results… they
» didn’t
» » say that in march we can have the final results of the first cohorts of
» » the phase2?? Am i wrong??

By the end of March 2008 we expect to announce preliminary 12 week data on up to 16 subjects in total and preliminary 24 week data on up to 10 subjects


#8

by september, the hair that is growing should be visible enough for a photo (hint) ICX that would get folks (and potential investors) interested in potential.

Warning for ICX, just in case “Brutus” is real…you are in a race. The first company to show a big regrowth photo with minimal/no donor hair loss (I.E. not a transplant) in a major publication will be recieving TONS of money from investors all over the world. The first company that can do this will see mega-bucks from investors from all over the planet. Make no mistake, Follica, backed by Proctor and Gamble and Gillette are trying to do this before you do, and dont seem to be stuck in neutral like Aderans has been for years now with little news. Who wants to be a millionaire???


#9

Dear debris,

I dont believe this is the attitude that we should have : its about science in the first place . Only science can bring the cure not the money : Such attitude can push corportations to some illegal practices (faking hair growth photos…etc) that we dont want to happen in the first place as we all are only interested in a genuine scientific cure instead of being victims of yet another snake oil .


#10

» http://www.londonstockexchange.com/LSECWS/IFSPages/MarketNewsPopup.aspx?id=1659695&source=RNS


#11

I meant benji, sorry !


#12

hehe. ok.