» » This is pretty conservative for Hasson and Wong. Usually I expect these
» » results from Cole or Woods.
» Ah, but this is not 37,000 leg and back hairs:)
» Remember, the first session was six and a half years ago. I don’t know if
» you were around back then but 3400 grafts in one session was considered to
» be pretty damn big. It is the equivalent today of getting about 5000 to
» 5500 in one session. The second session was almost as big as the first and
» it was four + years ago so while you may think it is conservative today
» (and you’d be correct) it was a pretty big deal back in the day. Comparing
» this work to current work by other clinics however says something:)
» That’s the 10,000 dollar question. Whenever I get that question, and I get
» it a lot, I just say that you should make that decision on your own. Look
» at the HUGE body of evidence that has accumulated over the years and decide
» what you like. Each has their own nuances that separate them but both are
» masters and have influenced the overall field dramatically. Think of it
» like this. If you like the Beetles, who is the better musician? Paul or
» John? Many like one over the other due to individual tastes but any Beetles
» fan will acknowledge that both John and Paul were two of the most
» influential musicians of modern times.
No I wasn’t around back then. If I wasn’t told who did this hair transplant, I would have placed my bets on Cole or Woods, never thought it would be Hasson and Wong. In my mind I have a tendency to categorize doctors based on their work, I think Cole and Woods’ work are very similar, and I like to pair Hasson and wong with Armani.
Boris, I think there are more results from Dr. Hasson in the forum than from Dr. Wong, if that is something that you care to know.