Please find below Dr. Nigam’s 2013 3rd Case Study of Hair Doubling with Stem Cell & DP Cells
In this case study we have extracted 1500 grafts from the donor area, 200 grafts were sent for stem cells multiplication, 100 grafts were sent for DP Cell Culture which will be ready after 2 months, 50 graft were used for DP isolation.
Hair doubling was done on remaining 1150 grafts. We were expecting 2300 follicular unit to be seen but we can see 2607 new follicular units.
There is a small correction in the picture name “Front”, it is 1150 New Grafts were bisected @Derma Papilla level and not 1050. Similarly 2300 grafts were implanted and not 2100.
thanks for this assessment. However I have to wonder what exactly you have circled. If you zoom in it appears that a red circle has been placed around pretty much every visible and even around not visible follicles:
here is an example of such:
where exactly is there a follicle? I cant seem to see anything.
This is not comprehensive. Can you not simply provide us with before / after images of the exact same donor area after a few days so that we can see if the donor area is regenerating?
What you have provided are random red and blue circles and figures which nobody can verify.
» Dear All,
»
» Please find below Dr. Nigam’s 2013 3rd Case Study of Hair Doubling with
» Stem Cell & DP Cells
»
» In this case study we have extracted 1500 grafts from the donor area, 200
» grafts were sent for stem cells multiplication, 100 grafts were sent for DP
» Cell Culture which will be ready after 2 months, 50 graft were used for DP
» isolation.
»
» Hair doubling was done on remaining 1150 grafts. We were expecting 2300
» follicular unit to be seen but we can see 2607 new follicular units.
»
» http://www.sendspace.com/file/5xul5e
»
» http://www.sendspace.com/file/sc2v4u
»
» http://www.sendspace.com/file/vtwx9c
»
» http://www.sendspace.com/file/iefjrc
»
»
» There is a small correction in the picture name “Front”, it is 1150 New
» Grafts were bisected @Derma Papilla level and not 1050. Similarly 2300
» grafts were implanted and not 2100.
»
» http://www.sendspace.com/file/037p7o
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
This is not extensive. Can you not basically offer us with before / after pictures of the identical contributor place after a few times so that we can see if the contributor place is regenerating?
Hairmann,
Video microscopic pics will be uploaded tomorrow,which will give more clear visibility.As you can see if you zoom in the macro photo, it becomes blurr.
» Dear All,
» »
» » Please find below Dr. Nigam’s 2013 3rd Case Study of Hair Doubling with
» » Stem Cell & DP Cells
» »
» » In this case study we have extracted 1500 grafts from the donor area,
» 200
» » grafts were sent for stem cells multiplication, 100 grafts were sent for
» DP
» » Cell Culture which will be ready after 2 months, 50 graft were used for
» DP
» » isolation.
» »
» » Hair doubling was done on remaining 1150 grafts. We were expecting 2300
» » follicular unit to be seen but we can see 2607 new follicular units.
» »
» » http://www.sendspace.com/file/5xul5e
» »
» » http://www.sendspace.com/file/sc2v4u
» »
» » http://www.sendspace.com/file/vtwx9c
» »
» » http://www.sendspace.com/file/iefjrc
» »
»
» »
» » There is a small correction in the picture name “Front”, it is 1150 New
» » Grafts were bisected @Derma Papilla level and not 1050. Similarly 2300
» » grafts were implanted and not 2100.
» »
» » http://www.sendspace.com/file/037p7o
» »
» »
»
» »
» »
»
» »
» »
»
» »
» »
»
It seems you are focusing mostly on photos and hair counts in the recipient area. I think you should be giving equal attention to regrowth in the donor areas; otherwise you can’t accurately claim that this is “hair doubling”.
Roger, In this case we have not done donor doubling but hair doubling at the recipient by bisecting the FU in vitro and implanting both the bisected parts at the recipient.
» Dr. Nigam,
»
» It seems you are focusing mostly on photos and hair counts in the recipient
» area. I think you should be giving equal attention to regrowth in the
» donor areas; otherwise you can’t accurately claim that this is “hair
» doubling”.
» Roger, In this case we have not done donor doubling but hair doubling at
» the recipient by bisecting the FU in vitro and implanting both the bisected
» parts at the recipient.
OK, thanks Dr. Nigam. That makes sense. So far I have not heard of any other doctor doing a procedure like that.
» Roger, In this case we have not done donor doubling but hair doubling at
» the recipient by bisecting the FU in vitro and implanting both the bisected
» parts at the recipient.
» » Dr. Nigam,
» »
» » It seems you are focusing mostly on photos and hair counts in the
» recipient
» » area. I think you should be giving equal attention to regrowth in the
» » donor areas; otherwise you can’t accurately claim that this is “hair
» » doubling”.
it would be great if you could show us a follicle before and after in vitro bisection.
Also, when bisecting follicles from the donor area, do you fill in the same incision point with one half and make a new incision for the second half?
I am also having difficulty understanding how you can get a yield of more than double (i.e. 2300 from 1150) the follicles through bisection?!
1500 grafts were bisected in Vitro and all grafts were implanted in the recipient area. Please remember this is not a donor doubling, we have implanted both the bisected parts of the follicle on the recipient area.
For quick healing of donor area, we have injected stem cell, DP cells with extra cellular matrix and the picture of healed donor area would be uploaded soon.
» Dr. Nigam,
»
» It seems you are focusing mostly on photos and hair counts in the recipient
» area. I think you should be giving equal attention to regrowth in the
» donor areas; otherwise you can’t accurately claim that this is “hair
» doubling”.
in my opinion the following image clearly shows hair which was extracted from the donor region. Did you not say the follicles were extracted from the recipient site and reimplanted into the same site?
The work you are doing is really interesting, but I fail to understand why you have such difficulty to explain the images which you provide in a comprehensive manner
» Dear Dr Nigam,
»
» most of the links you have provided are wrong.
»
» half of them are delete requests. The other half are pictures in your
» private google account which would require your username/password to view.
»
» The first few pictures on sendspace work, however I have never in my life
» seen such blurry pictures.
»
» I have however provided images below of the files I was able to download.
»
» Regards,
» hairman2
» Dear Dr Nigam,
»
» in my opinion the following image clearly shows hair which was extracted
» from the donor region. Did you not say the follicles were extracted from
» the recipient site and reimplanted into the same site?
»
Its hair doubling, not donor doubling. What he said was the doubled hairs, or basically split into two pieces, were implanted in the recipient so you get 2X hairs at the recipient versus replenishing the donor and getting the other half in the recipient.
FU’S were extracted from the donor at the back of the scalp.
2)These FU’S were bisected in vitro at the level of dermal papilla under magnification.
3)The bisected FU’S were implanted at hairline and front of the scalp.
4)Activated stemcells,isolated dp cells and ecm were injected into the bisected FU’S after implantation at the recipient.
5)We have not implanted any bisected FU’S at the donor back scalp.
6)We will give additional stemcell shot on day 45 with the cultured dermal papilla cells at the recipient and the donor scalp.
Pics with content are uploaded by my secretary, i will ask him to upload again tomorrow and correct the problem encountered with the send space link.
I am 34 year old male suffering from hair loss, I had visited your clinic a few days back , Dr Naina consulted me and suggested to go for stem cell treatment and 1000 fue for touching up hairline. I had also consulted another clinic which does hair transplant & stem cell and they told me that stem cell results are very poor and they only yield 20-30 % of the desired result hence they recommended me fue. He also told me that the result of stem cell would not give me good density, it would only camouflage the bald patch. I am very much confused as to go for stem cell or total fue or fut.
I had one more question. I know that you you treat so many people on day to day basis so why don’t you post more results on your website ( I have till date seen only 2-3 results displayed.
Dear Hairman21(by the way we have one more hairman from berlin),
The stemcells you are most probably talking about are allogenic fat stemcells in an ampoule,which is purely a marketimg gimmick.
As far i know we are the only one having FDA licensed and certified lab for regenerative hair research in INDIA.In our stemcell technique we extract 100 FU’S from the back of your scalp and send to our lab in mumbai.
Where the cells are sorted, isolated and then activated for your first injection.
Subsequently we will inject 3 more injections of multiplied stemcells and isolated dp cells after every 2 months approx.
At present the success rate with our HM is 50% approx.
Mail me your pics at dr.rahul1970@gmail.com of donor scalp,front,top and side view close up for assessment and correct recommendation to you.
At present the success rate of hm at our clinic is 50% i.e a density of atleast30FU’Sper sqcm by the end of 1year in approx 50% case injected with autologous stemcell solution.
If you end up being the unfortunate one who did not get complete coverage ,we can fill the balance scalp with hair doubling , wherein hair grafts are extracted like fue from the back of your scalp, but bisected into two in vitro under magnification( hence doubled) and implanted into your recipient scalp.once i know your name on my mail i can discuss your case with miss naina,my counselor.
Regarding less pics posted on my site ,as you are aware you are from mumbai and can see me in person including my patients,my own result.
Since last three months i have joined these forums i don’t post much pics if their lighting,angle,colour,macro closeups are not clear.Or else my forum friends copy and post on the forum. In coming months you will see more pics as our photography is improving to higher digital standards.You can meet in person patients from mumbai or talk on phone.You can see my own results when you meet me at the clinic.
regards drnigam
This is not extensive. Can you not basically offer us with before / after pictures of the identical contributor place after a few times so that we can see if the contributor place is regenerating?
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.
