Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Dr. Lawrence Custinger is a hoax


#1

For all the really intelligent scientists who work/study so EXTREMELY hard trying to solve baldness, its almost an insult to them to claim something shampoo causes baldness.

Look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4283302.stm, and then tell me genetics dont play ANY role in hairloss. By the way, Dr. Angela Christiano has discovered 3 genes for baldness SO FAR. This info is here http://www.aderansresearch.com/pdfs/03Newsweek_02_05.pdf

I have no idea why Lawrence Custinger created that retarded site. There is alot of plain ol’ WRONG information on it (like him stating that there is no baldness gene—3 have been discovered). Winos proboably have good hair because of the constant dialation of their peripheral blood vessels because of booze and the fact they only produce about half the normal level of Testosterone to be converted to more dangerous male hormones. Statues of bald people from ancient Greece are legion. There was no shampoo back then, and its not mentioned in any medical literature. The oldest known balding remedy is from 1500 b.c. in Ancient Egypt. No shampoo back then either. Shampoo is never mentioned at all in historical texts. Earliest shampoo is found here http://archives.stupidquestion.net/sq53101.html . I hope you appreciate the appropriateness of that web addy…“stupid archives”. People cleaned their hair with plain ol’ water way back when.

Stumptailed macaques bald much like people do and are studied in baldness research. Gorillas, baboons, and other primates pattern bald also, usually straight back. WTF cant some people accept this, and constantly look to blame hair dryers, combs, shampoo, chlorine, etc. You are going bald because of the equation genetics+androgen hormones= MPB.

I have a feeling Custinger is either a nutjob or he would stand to benefit if the surficant sodium laureth sulfate was replaced with another surficant in commercial grade shampoo’s. Or perhaps he is just a cruel man who is enjoying his hoax, or hates the makers of propecia/minox and wants to see many try using no shampoo as a way of hurting those drug makers. Maybe he is somehow affiliated with the hairtransplant industry and wants to see millions of young men lose their hair prematurely so they will seek a surgical solution (note, sebum accumulation on your scalp will allow the DHT-rich sebum to re-absorb back in your scalp, thus hurting the follicle more than is usual). Whatever his shitty reason, Custinger is misleading a FEW. Because most that go looking for answers to hairloss dont fall for that BS for long.


#2

» For all the really intelligent scientists who work/study so EXTREMELY hard
» trying to solve baldness, its almost an insult to them to claim something
» shampoo causes baldness.
»
» Look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4283302.stm, and then tell
» me genetics dont play ANY role in hairloss. By the way, Dr. Angela
» Christiano has discovered 3 genes for baldness SO FAR. This info is here
» http://www.aderansresearch.com/pdfs/03Newsweek_02_05.pdf
»
»
»
» I have no idea why Lawrence Custinger created that retarded site. There is
» alot of plain ol’ WRONG information on it (like him stating that there is
» no baldness gene—3 have been discovered). Winos proboably have good hair
» because of the constant dialation of their peripheral blood vessels because
» of booze and the fact they only produce about half the normal level of
» Testosterone to be converted to more dangerous male hormones. Statues of
» bald people from ancient Greece are legion. There was no shampoo back
» then, and its not mentioned in any medical literature. The oldest known
» balding remedy is from 1500 b.c. in Ancient Egypt. No shampoo back then
» either. Shampoo is never mentioned at all in historical texts. Earliest
» shampoo is found here http://archives.stupidquestion.net/sq53101.html . I
» hope you appreciate the appropriateness of that web addy…“stupid
» archives”. People cleaned their hair with plain ol’ water way back when.
»
» Stumptailed macaques bald much like people do and are studied in baldness
» research. Gorillas, baboons, and other primates pattern bald also, usually
» straight back. WTF cant some people accept this, and constantly look to
» blame hair dryers, combs, shampoo, chlorine, etc. You are going bald
» because of the equation genetics+androgen hormones= MPB.
»
» I have a feeling Custinger is either a nutjob or he would stand to benefit
» if the surficant sodium laureth sulfate was replaced with another surficant
» in commercial grade shampoo’s. Or perhaps he is just a cruel man who is
» enjoying his hoax, or hates the makers of propecia/minox and wants to see
» many try using no shampoo as a way of hurting those drug makers. Maybe he
» is somehow affiliated with the hairtransplant industry and wants to see
» millions of young men lose their hair prematurely so they will seek a
» surgical solution (note, sebum accumulation on your scalp will allow the
» DHT-rich sebum to re-absorb back in your scalp, thus hurting the follicle
» more than is usual). Whatever his shitty reason, Custinger is misleading a
» FEW. Because most that go looking for answers to hairloss dont fall for
» that BS for long.

Oh, those poor old scientists working so hard so YoYo can have a full head of hair again. Yeah right YoYo. Spare me your b.s. Look at Lawrence’s photos and tell me you don’t see regrowth. Cutsinger is trying to get the word out about SLS and you obviously I can see now, is being paid by the shampoo companies to try to put a thorn into this ever growing movement. Believe me YoYo, we are used to professional b.s. debunkers like you. Would you take me more serious if I put on my fake white lab coat.


#3

I would take you seriously if you could actually prove that shampoo is a cause of baldness. Till then I don’t see a reason as to why I should even read your posts. I only post to inform people of your stupidity.


#4

» I would take you seriously if you could actually prove that shampoo is a
» cause of baldness.
My pics alone prove Grunge (no shampoo) plays a major role in baldness.

My appearance on Oprah will settle it.

Enough fighting.

The Regrowth King


#5

» » I would take you seriously if you could actually prove that shampoo is a
» » cause of baldness.
» My pics alone prove Grunge (no shampoo) plays a major role in baldness.
»
» My appearance on Oprah will settle it.
»
» Enough fighting.
»
» The Regrowth King

Widows, I don’t think you realize just how bad you make everyone at <> with dumbass comments like this one. Because of your lunacy, these people just assume other members are in some cult or are as crazy as you are and that is not the case. you totally embarras me, Hitler and Diamond Dave and the thousands of other members secretly there with your constant talk about being on Oprah. Drop the Oprah deal already. You know it’s not going to happen and admit you are just jealous of Lawrence grabbing all the spotlight.


#6

» For all the really intelligent scientists who work/study so EXTREMELY hard
» trying to solve baldness, its almost an insult to them to claim something
» shampoo causes baldness.
»
» Look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4283302.stm, and then tell
» me genetics dont play ANY role in hairloss. By the way, Dr. Angela
» Christiano has discovered 3 genes for baldness SO FAR. This info is here
» http://www.aderansresearch.com/pdfs/03Newsweek_02_05.pdf
»
»
»
» I have no idea why Lawrence Custinger created that retarded site. There is
» alot of plain ol’ WRONG information on it (like him stating that there is
» no baldness gene—3 have been discovered). Winos proboably have good hair
» because of the constant dialation of their peripheral blood vessels because
» of booze and the fact they only produce about half the normal level of
» Testosterone to be converted to more dangerous male hormones. Statues of
» bald people from ancient Greece are legion. There was no shampoo back
» then, and its not mentioned in any medical literature. The oldest known
» balding remedy is from 1500 b.c. in Ancient Egypt. No shampoo back then
» either. Shampoo is never mentioned at all in historical texts. Earliest
» shampoo is found here http://archives.stupidquestion.net/sq53101.html . I
» hope you appreciate the appropriateness of that web addy…“stupid
» archives”. People cleaned their hair with plain ol’ water way back when.
»
» Stumptailed macaques bald much like people do and are studied in baldness
» research. Gorillas, baboons, and other primates pattern bald also, usually
» straight back. WTF cant some people accept this, and constantly look to
» blame hair dryers, combs, shampoo, chlorine, etc. You are going bald
» because of the equation genetics+androgen hormones= MPB.
»
» I have a feeling Custinger is either a nutjob or he would stand to benefit
» if the surficant sodium laureth sulfate was replaced with another surficant
» in commercial grade shampoo’s. Or perhaps he is just a cruel man who is
» enjoying his hoax, or hates the makers of propecia/minox and wants to see
» many try using no shampoo as a way of hurting those drug makers. Maybe he
» is somehow affiliated with the hairtransplant industry and wants to see
» millions of young men lose their hair prematurely so they will seek a
» surgical solution (note, sebum accumulation on your scalp will allow the
» DHT-rich sebum to re-absorb back in your scalp, thus hurting the follicle
» more than is usual). Whatever his shitty reason, Custinger is misleading a
» FEW. Because most that go looking for answers to hairloss dont fall for
» that BS for long.

Troyo, that is a pretty bold statement to make regarding my leader Dr. Lawrence Cutsinger. You better be prepared to supply the evidence proving he is a hoax or else be prepared for a battle. Hitler, Dave and I have provided tons of evidence proving grunge regrows hair yet all of you skeptics have not even looked at it nor provided one shred of evidence on your behalf proving that we are wrong. The best you can come up with is some little slam against our leader Dr. Lawrence Cutsinger claiming he is a hoax. How pathetic is that Troyo.


#7

its not just widows idiotic comments its all you nutjob shampoo cult members
that make it look like a scientology meeting

you guys post no proof pics when asked, provide ZERO evidence when asked, you act exactly like cult members you just FOLLOW THE LEADER…and all you talk about is ONE GUY and we are supposed to believe it is so because Lawrence says so

sorry doesnt work like that on this board We could give a flying (*^ about Lawrence, you have to stand on your own two feet on this board and so far all you guys are doing is falling down


#8

» » For all the really intelligent scientists who work/study so EXTREMELY
» hard
» » trying to solve baldness, its almost an insult to them to claim
» something
» » shampoo causes baldness.
» »
» » Look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4283302.stm, and then
» tell
» » me genetics dont play ANY role in hairloss. By the way, Dr. Angela
» » Christiano has discovered 3 genes for baldness SO FAR. This info is
» here
» » http://www.aderansresearch.com/pdfs/03Newsweek_02_05.pdf
» »
» »
» »
» » I have no idea why Lawrence Custinger created that retarded site. There
» is
» » alot of plain ol’ WRONG information on it (like him stating that there
» is
» » no baldness gene—3 have been discovered). Winos proboably have good
» hair
» » because of the constant dialation of their peripheral blood vessels
» because
» » of booze and the fact they only produce about half the normal level of
» » Testosterone to be converted to more dangerous male hormones. Statues
» of
» » bald people from ancient Greece are legion. There was no shampoo back
» » then, and its not mentioned in any medical literature. The oldest known
» » balding remedy is from 1500 b.c. in Ancient Egypt. No shampoo back then
» » either. Shampoo is never mentioned at all in historical texts. Earliest
» » shampoo is found here http://archives.stupidquestion.net/sq53101.html .
» I
» » hope you appreciate the appropriateness of that web addy…“stupid
» » archives”. People cleaned their hair with plain ol’ water way back
» when.
» »
» » Stumptailed macaques bald much like people do and are studied in
» baldness
» » research. Gorillas, baboons, and other primates pattern bald also,
» usually
» » straight back. WTF cant some people accept this, and constantly look to
» » blame hair dryers, combs, shampoo, chlorine, etc. You are going bald
» » because of the equation genetics+androgen hormones= MPB.
» »
» » I have a feeling Custinger is either a nutjob or he would stand to
» benefit
» » if the surficant sodium laureth sulfate was replaced with another
» surficant
» » in commercial grade shampoo’s. Or perhaps he is just a cruel man who is
» » enjoying his hoax, or hates the makers of propecia/minox and wants to
» see
» » many try using no shampoo as a way of hurting those drug makers. Maybe
» he
» » is somehow affiliated with the hairtransplant industry and wants to see
» » millions of young men lose their hair prematurely so they will seek a
» » surgical solution (note, sebum accumulation on your scalp will allow
» the
» » DHT-rich sebum to re-absorb back in your scalp, thus hurting the
» follicle
» » more than is usual). Whatever his shitty reason, Custinger is misleading
» a
» » FEW. Because most that go looking for answers to hairloss dont fall for
» » that BS for long.
»
» Troyo, that is a pretty bold statement to make regarding my leader Dr.
» Lawrence Cutsinger. You better be prepared to supply the evidence proving
» he is a hoax or else be prepared for a battle. Hitler, Dave and I have
» provided tons of evidence proving grunge regrows hair yet all of you
» skeptics have not even looked at it nor provided one shred of evidence on
» your behalf proving that we are wrong. The best you can come up with is
» some little slam against our leader Dr. Lawrence Cutsinger claiming he is
» a hoax. How pathetic is that Troyo.

what “evidence” have you provided

so far all we see is nonstop statements of…Our leader said so , so that makes it true

that is not evidence

that is pathetic