Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Deaf Dumb and Blind


#1

This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM hairs will continue to grow forever

yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
where follicles are dht-resistant.

typical ignorant HM cheerleader response

the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes more than half the hair in the occipital region

oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues to grow forever

the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one of two things is transpiring here

  1. you guys are plants for ICX

  2. you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these guys pump out without questioning it.

I think number 2 is more likely to be the case


#2

» This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM hairs
» will continue to grow forever
»
» yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» where follicles are dht-resistant.

»
» typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
»
» the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes
» more than half the hair in the occipital region
»
» oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues to
» grow forever
»
» the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one of
» two things is transpiring here
»
» 1) you guys are plants for ICX
»
» 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these guys
» pump out without questioning it.
»
» I think number 2 is more likely to be the case

You’re right in some aspects, most of us are highly inrigued for the future of ICX. But what are you trying to prove by consitantly bashing their organization. There must be a reason behind your everyday, “debbie downer” attitude toward this great technology. And for it taking 20 years to be finished, that is not the case. How do I know you might ask… First off it would go under if it took that long. Second, Intercytex has bills just like every other pharmaceutical and medical research company and they’ve gone to far to just let it flop and go along with life with their tails between their legs and just leave it as a flop. They are working, and working hard- are they a little slow on things you might ask? Sure, but I think the general population would be very hesitent to run out and get the procedure done if it was completed and finalized within a year. So when people read HangInThere’s posts, don’t take it to heart. He’s just a bitter soul. Sure there are numerous questions that need answered, and they will be in good time. Everybody needs to just chill out and not live day by day waiting for this excellent scientific procedure to be fully completed. I’m not hating on you, but I feel you must have more reasons by you bash Intercytex. What reasons they are, I am not concerned with. All I am concerned with is that Intercytex takes their time and truely master’s this world changing procedure. :slight_smile:


#3

» » This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM
» hairs
» » will continue to grow forever
» »
» » yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» » where follicles are dht-resistant.

» »
» » typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
» »
» » the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes
» » more than half the hair in the occipital region
» »
» » oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues
» to
» » grow forever
» »
» » the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one of
» » two things is transpiring here
» »
» » 1) you guys are plants for ICX
» »
» » 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these
» guys
» » pump out without questioning it.
» »
» » I think number 2 is more likely to be the case
»
» You’re right in some aspects, most of us are highly inrigued for the
» future of ICX. But what are you trying to prove by consitantly bashing
» their organization. There must be a reason behind your everyday, “debbie
» downer” attitude toward this great technology. And for it taking 20 years
» to be finished, that is not the case. How do I know you might ask… First
» off it would go under if it took that long. Second, Intercytex has bills
» just like every other pharmaceutical and medical research company and
» they’ve gone to far to just let it flop and go along with life with their
» tails between their legs and just leave it as a flop. They are working,
» and working hard- are they a little slow on things you might ask? Sure,
» but I think the general population would be very hesitent to run out and
» get the procedure done if it was completed and finalized within a year. So
» when people read HangInThere’s posts, don’t take it to heart. He’s just a
» bitter soul. Sure there are numerous questions that need answered, and
» they will be in good time. Everybody needs to just chill out and not live
» day by day waiting for this excellent scientific procedure to be fully
» completed. I’m not hating on you, but I feel you must have more reasons by
» you bash Intercytex. What reasons they are, I am not concerned with. All I
» am concerned with is that Intercytex takes their time and truely master’s
» this world changing procedure. :slight_smile:

i dont bash HM For the hell of it, if they had answers to the questions I ask, it would be a different story but all i hear is double talk and a bunch of desperate guys who will twist the answers ICX gives so that their bubble is not burst

this board is full of cover your eyes cheerleaders who get upset when anyone doubts ICX,

as opposed to the hair transplant board, which is full of logical guys, who require proof before they accept conclusions or statements,
we like photos…that would be a help, but ICX is afraid to post them…why?

most of the time I post questions to you guys, for example the photo question nobody has answered

the hair count question, why post hair percentages when hair count is a whole different ball game that will give a more accurate reading

why not post number of terminal hairs? I have asked this countless times and of course you guys have no answer, and wiggle and squirm to come up with something that makes ICX look good

you guys are biased for HM, …obviously, and will do anything to cling to the notion that ICX is the saviour

why not require more proof or evidence? because if it not forthcoming it might burst your bubbles and we wouldnt want that now would we


#4

» » » This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM
» » hairs
» » » will continue to grow forever
» » »
» » » yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» » » where follicles are dht-resistant.

» » »
» » » typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
» » »
» » » the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses
» sometimes
» » » more than half the hair in the occipital region
» » »
» » » oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues
» » to
» » » grow forever
» » »
» » » the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one
» of
» » » two things is transpiring here
» » »
» » » 1) you guys are plants for ICX
» » »
» » » 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these
» » guys
» » » pump out without questioning it.
» » »
» » » I think number 2 is more likely to be the case
» »
» » You’re right in some aspects, most of us are highly inrigued for the
» » future of ICX. But what are you trying to prove by consitantly bashing
» » their organization. There must be a reason behind your everyday,
» “debbie
» » downer” attitude toward this great technology. And for it taking 20
» years
» » to be finished, that is not the case. How do I know you might ask…
» First
» » off it would go under if it took that long. Second, Intercytex has
» bills
» » just like every other pharmaceutical and medical research company and
» » they’ve gone to far to just let it flop and go along with life with
» their
» » tails between their legs and just leave it as a flop. They are working,
» » and working hard- are they a little slow on things you might ask? Sure,
» » but I think the general population would be very hesitent to run out
» and
» » get the procedure done if it was completed and finalized within a year.
» So
» » when people read HangInThere’s posts, don’t take it to heart. He’s just
» a
» » bitter soul. Sure there are numerous questions that need answered, and
» » they will be in good time. Everybody needs to just chill out and not
» live
» » day by day waiting for this excellent scientific procedure to be fully
» » completed. I’m not hating on you, but I feel you must have more reasons
» by
» » you bash Intercytex. What reasons they are, I am not concerned with. All
» I
» » am concerned with is that Intercytex takes their time and truely
» master’s
» » this world changing procedure. :slight_smile:
»
» i dont bash HM For the hell of it, if they had answers to the questions I
» ask, it would be a different story but all i hear is double talk and a
» bunch of desperate guys who will twist the answers ICX gives so that their
» bubble is not burst
»
» this board is full of cover your eyes cheerleaders who get upset when
» anyone doubts ICX,
»
» as opposed to the hair transplant board, which is full of logical guys,
» who require proof before they accept conclusions or statements,
» we like photos…that would be a help, but ICX is afraid to
» post them…why?
»
» most of the time I post questions to you guys, for example the photo
» question nobody has answered
»
» the hair count question, why post hair percentages when hair count is a
» whole different ball game that will give a more accurate reading
»
» why not post number of terminal hairs? I have asked this countless times
» and of course you guys have no answer, and wiggle and squirm to come up
» with something that makes ICX look good
»
» you guys are biased for HM, …obviously, and will do anything to
» cling to the notion that ICX is the saviour
»
» why not require more proof or evidence? because if it not forthcoming it
» might burst your bubbles and we wouldnt want that now would we

dude.

maybe it’s time for you to direct your questions to ICX themselves if you are not getting the answers you want answered. Or try different hair forums for their HM sections. They (ICX) have a lady named Katherine that replies to a lot of emails from people who ask questions.

unlike HT, HM has not been out. it’s easy to get photos of HT patients because it’s been around since like almost 27 years now right?

HM is not going to post photos until they get a working product the way they want it to work. you saw those percentages from phase 2 results man they were all over the place.

why post photos so their stock can go down even more?? why not perfect it as good as you can, get some EXCELLENT before and after photos and then launch it? It makes sense to me. I don’t expect photos at this point and i dont want photos of they dont have a fully woking product or it needs to be refined. get that shyt working and then show me what you got. :slight_smile:

there’s really only a handful of guys in this section that really understand this technology better than the rest of us. i come here to read up on what’s going on with HM and to see intelligent discussions about any new news.

why do you say everyone here is like HM cheerleaders like everybody in this section are just a bunch of desperate fools and you are the only person who has thought of those questions? those topics have been beaten to death in this section and i think its to the point now where people see the same questions and they just skip over to the next thread. i had a ton of bookmarks i could have sent you before hairsite converted the website and everything got deleted. sigh.

my thing is - i am hoping for HM to be a success and if it starts to seem like BS then i’ll just shave my head screw getting a half ass HT with limited donor supply. but right now it’s a promising technology that is the closest thing to a cure we have. everything else is a temporary fix that is hit or miss.

a lot of your posts come off like you’re pissed and more like “here’s why HM is BS now prove me wrong”…who has time to argue all day like that? not me. :slight_smile:


#5

» » » » This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM
» » » hairs
» » » » will continue to grow forever
» » » »
» » » » yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» » » » where follicles are dht-resistant.

» » » »
» » » » typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
» » » »
» » » » the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses
» » sometimes
» » » » more than half the hair in the occipital region
» » » »
» » » » oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and
» continues
» » » to
» » » » grow forever
» » » »
» » » » the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe
» one
» » of
» » » » two things is transpiring here
» » » »
» » » » 1) you guys are plants for ICX
» » » »
» » » » 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these
» » » guys
» » » » pump out without questioning it.
» » » »
» » » » I think number 2 is more likely to be the case
» » »
» » » You’re right in some aspects, most of us are highly inrigued for the
» » » future of ICX. But what are you trying to prove by consitantly
» bashing
» » » their organization. There must be a reason behind your everyday,
» » “debbie
» » » downer” attitude toward this great technology. And for it taking 20
» » years
» » » to be finished, that is not the case. How do I know you might ask…
» » First
» » » off it would go under if it took that long. Second, Intercytex has
» » bills
» » » just like every other pharmaceutical and medical research company and
» » » they’ve gone to far to just let it flop and go along with life with
» » their
» » » tails between their legs and just leave it as a flop. They are
» working,
» » » and working hard- are they a little slow on things you might ask?
» Sure,
» » » but I think the general population would be very hesitent to run out
» » and
» » » get the procedure done if it was completed and finalized within a
» year.
» » So
» » » when people read HangInThere’s posts, don’t take it to heart. He’s
» just
» » a
» » » bitter soul. Sure there are numerous questions that need answered,
» and
» » » they will be in good time. Everybody needs to just chill out and not
» » live
» » » day by day waiting for this excellent scientific procedure to be
» fully
» » » completed. I’m not hating on you, but I feel you must have more
» reasons
» » by
» » » you bash Intercytex. What reasons they are, I am not concerned with.
» All
» » I
» » » am concerned with is that Intercytex takes their time and truely
» » master’s
» » » this world changing procedure. :slight_smile:
» »
» » i dont bash HM For the hell of it, if they had answers to the questions
» I
» » ask, it would be a different story but all i hear is double talk and a
» » bunch of desperate guys who will twist the answers ICX gives so that
» their
» » bubble is not burst
» »
» » this board is full of cover your eyes cheerleaders who get upset when
» » anyone doubts ICX,
» »
» » as opposed to the hair transplant board, which is full of logical guys,
» » who require proof before they accept conclusions or statements,
» » we like photos…that would be a help, but ICX is afraid to
» » post them…why?
» »
» » most of the time I post questions to you guys, for example the photo
» » question nobody has answered
» »
» » the hair count question, why post hair percentages when hair count is a
» » whole different ball game that will give a more accurate reading
» »
» » why not post number of terminal hairs? I have asked this countless
» times
» » and of course you guys have no answer, and wiggle and squirm to come up
» » with something that makes ICX look good
» »
» » you guys are biased for HM, …obviously, and will do anything
» to
» » cling to the notion that ICX is the saviour
» »
» » why not require more proof or evidence? because if it not forthcoming
» it
» » might burst your bubbles and we wouldnt want that now would we
»
» dude.
»
» maybe it’s time for you to direct your questions to ICX themselves if you
» are not getting the answers you want answered. Or try different hair
» forums for their HM sections. They (ICX) have a lady named Katherine that
» replies to a lot of emails from people who ask questions.
»
» unlike HT, HM has not been out. it’s easy to get photos of HT patients
» because it’s been around since like almost 27 years now right?
»
» HM is not going to post photos until they get a working product the way
» they want it to work. you saw those percentages from phase 2 results man
» they were all over the place.
»
» why post photos so their stock can go down even more?? why not perfect it
» as good as you can, get some EXCELLENT before and after photos and then
» launch it? It makes sense to me. I don’t expect photos at this point and i
» dont want photos of they dont have a fully woking product or it needs to be
» refined. get that shyt working and then show me what you got. :slight_smile:
»
» there’s really only a handful of guys in this section that really
» understand this technology better than the rest of us. i come here to read
» up on what’s going on with HM and to see intelligent discussions about any
» new news.
»
» why do you say everyone here is like HM cheerleaders like everybody in
» this section are just a bunch of desperate fools and you are the only
» person who has thought of those questions? my thing is - i am hoping for
» HM to be a success and if it starts to seem like BS then i’ll just shave
» my head screw getting a half ass HT with limited donor supply.
»
» a lot of your posts come off like you’re pissed and more like “here’s why
» HM is BS now prove me wrong”…who has time to argue all day like that?
» not me. :slight_smile:

pissed off at HM? at whom

no im offering healthy dose of skepticm, something that is lacking on this forum, and when they see it, it incenses them and they immediately say TROLL TROLL, or like with Bryan, they cannot even comprehend what he is asking them, much less respond to it

what is wrong with healthy skepticism. something this board needs

I see nothing but cheerleading, maybe 1 percent of the posters asks, hey what about this, why are they not providing us with this information

all I see is YES ICX is coming out with some new information, Looks good Huh, I cant wait


#6

» all I see is YES ICX is coming out with some new information, Looks good
» Huh, I cant wait

yea because everything in this section is debateable and at best an educated guess based on information they have put out so if people are excited to see new info it’s because that’s a lot better than “HM will take 30 years to come out” or “HM works perfectly” all that talk are people giving educated guesses, lol. the only people that really know if HM is going to work without a bunch of the issues we ask about is ICX.


#7

Hairs will obviously be taken from the traditional donor area in the very back of the head.

Hairs on the side of the head thin out some, a man loses much more density on the sides than he does in the “heart” of the donor area in the very back of the head, under the vertex.

Transplant docs don’t resort to occipital hair usually until they have harvested a good amound of the “choice” donor hair.

Good Grief, it was Intercytex’s first real swing at growing hair, and everyone in the trial grew hair as there were no non-responders. Nobody was on finasteride in the trial either, so men were naturally continuing to go bald other than the new cell injections placed in their scalps.

There may be many “little” trials of 8 or so participants until the best depth of injects, or varrying depths of injects, best cellular mixes, best cell culturing mixes, and amount of injects is found.

Consider the guy who over DOUBLEDhis density “proof of concept”.

Yeah, it may be a few more years…but it IS coming someday. HM may not even be the “ultimate solution” either. In ten or twenty years time, other things might surpass it. We may be able to turn off bad hair genes someday, and recharge hairs in the scalp. The ACELL protocol or the wound-healing (Follica) protocol might work much better than even hoped. As we decode the human genome, and continue to make medical advances, who knows what the future holds for regenerative medicine.

I can tell you this: There will be better things for hairloss than pills and vitamins in the future. These things are hold-overs until the “cure” comes, and it IS being worked on by some of the smartest people on this planet. Im confident.


#8

» Hairs will obviously be taken from the traditional donor area in the very
» back of the head.
»
»
» Hairs on the side of the head thin out some, a man loses much more density
» on the sides than he does in the “heart” of the donor area in the very back
» of the head, under the vertex.
»
»
» Transplant docs don’t resort to occipital hair usually until they have
» harvested a good amound of the “choice” donor hair.
»
»
»
»
»
» Good Grief, it was Intercytex’s first real swing at growing hair, and
» everyone in the trial grew hair as there were no non-responders. Nobody
» was on finasteride in the trial either, so men were naturally continuing
» to go bald other than the new cell injections placed in their scalps.
»
» There may be many “little” trials of 8 or so participants until the best
» depth of injects, or varrying depths of injects, best cellular mixes, best
» cell culturing mixes, and amount of injects is found.
»
»
» Consider the guy who over DOUBLEDhis density “proof of concept”.
»
»
»
» Yeah, it may be a few more years…but it IS coming
» someday. HM may not even be the “ultimate solution” either. In ten or
» twenty years time, other things might surpass it. We may be able to turn
» off bad hair genes someday, and recharge hairs in the scalp. The ACELL
» protocol or the wound-healing (Follica) protocol might work much better
» than even hoped. As we decode the human genome, and continue to make
» medical advances, who knows what the future holds for regenerative
» medicine.
»
»
» I can tell you this: There will be better things for hairloss than pills
» and vitamins in the future. These things are hold-overs until the “cure”
» comes, and it IS being worked on by some of the smartest people on this
» planet. Im confident.

ok your leader is calling, just dont believe you when he says there is nothing in the Koolaide


#9

My friend, don’t feed the trolls!

The reply you just received more than indicates why.


#10

» This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM hairs
» will continue to grow forever
»
» yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» where follicles are dht-resistant.

»
» typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
»
» the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes
» more than half the hair in the occipital region
»
» oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues to
» grow forever
»
» the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one of
» two things is transpiring here
»
» 1) you guys are plants for ICX
»
» 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these guys
» pump out without questioning it.
»
» I think number 2 is more likely to be the case

Hey Dippy…

you really don’t bring anything to the table do you? You continue to say the same things over and over. I can’t really understand why you continue to post here. You have platformed yourself on the same position of “direction” time and time again. Many people have said to you the answer remains undetermined, but you take this as a complete failure not only by ICX but also by repliers trying to communicate with you. Why assume, presume and conclude upon something you yourself have no answer to? Why do you continue this endless pissing contest between posters and yourself? We have said we don’t know the answer for sure. The people who do know the answer have stated that it is non-serious. Does that make us believers? For most, it does Hanginginthere. So, you call us names like sheeple and cheerleaders for that reason. Not really that clever. Not a bit sir.

Do you really think you are accomplishing anything at all by telling people they are wrong? Better yet, what are you trying to accomplish???

What are you trying to accomplish by challenging the majority of this forum?

It seems to me that you yourself would like to be known as the sheppard, instead of ICX. You really, really want people to read your posts and say, “Man, he is sure logical. I bet Hangin’ is a real cool guy.” When this doesn’t happen, and people become angered by your CONTINUAL pessimism, you can’t help but lash out at those who contest your thoughts and ideas.

What is most annoying is how much you actually permeate the forum with the same post over and over again. “Direction this” and “Direction that”…wrapped up by the famous “HM is a lost cause” type conclusion {usually delivered in some lackluster attempt at wit}. It is absurd and tired your broken record technique. You won’t destroy the hopes of this forum. Your POV has no backing. You think that screaming at the top of your lungs will purge an answer or cure. In the meantime, you attempt to steamroll any challenger in your way. Your tiny thoughts can never touch the optimism and constructive conversation that fuels this forum. Yet you continue to post…

You continue to post…

You won’t stop posting…

post, post, post…

Please stop posting.


#11

» 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these guys
» pump out without questioning it.
»
» I think number 2 is more likely to be the case

  1. If hair does not survive in the fringe, why is HT a thriving business?

  2. If a guy does in fact lose about 50% of the hair in his fringe, and this translates to 50% of the HM hairs eventually falling out, then he can simply get more injections in the future and regrow the lost hair…ad nauseam.

  3. Many physicians claim that 50% of teenage density will provide the illusion of a full head of hair. Even if this is not the case, 50% of original density will look a whole lot fuller than a horseshoe-fringe-do.

  4. Even if HM is not perfect, it is far more promising than anything you have to offer us as an alternative.

  5. I’m a NWIII with a stabilized pattern of hairloss. It’s not going to take a whole lot of new hair to dramatically improve the appearance of my hair-do and provide the illusion of a full head of hair.

  6. A much better argument against HM would be based upon the fact that consistency is completely unproven with this new technology.

  7. If those home remedy supplements make you feel better about your hairloss, more power to you…but they continue to be an unproven approach. You could save a lot of money and get a better response by taking generic minox/prop :slight_smile:

<<<<as opposed to the hair transplant board, which is full of logical guys, who require proof before they accept conclusions or statements>>>>>

Wait, if HT is so great, how does it work when over 50% of the fringe hair falls out? It appears your entire argument is baseless.

<<<no im offering healthy dose of skepticm, something that is lacking on this forum, and when they see it>>>

Well, you should know then that I am extremely skeptical about HT being a legitimate solution–despite the fact that you cheer for and advocate it.

<<<<<<all that talk are people giving educated guesses, lol…>>>>>

Kind of like what you do when you advertise your natural regimen? Maybe you should pull the plank from your own eye before you criticize the speck in your neighbors’.


#12

» yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» where follicles are dht-resistant.

»
» typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
»
» the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes
» more than half the hair in the occipital region

Well HanginInThere I for one will totally agree with you on this point.I deal with the public everytime I go to work.Over the years I’ve observed alsorts.I have noticed some older men,perhaps in their fifties and sixties,that have nearly no hair at the back.So yes from this point maybe if ICX-TRC does come out.It may still make sence to take Propecia or the alternatives to make sure the hair stays on your head.

A lot of hair transplant doctors only state the hair will stay as long as the hair at the back,the occipital region,does,so there is something in the point you make.

Looking at the trial information for ICX-TRC.I’m just glad I never managed to get on trials,not that I didn’t try,luckily everytime amounted to a big nothing.


#13

Nice post James Bond :ok:

This guy will not stop posting this bullshiet so lets just ignore him.

If he believes that HM will not work, its ok with us. There is no point trying to convince him otherwise. And since he keeps posting that this forum lacks of healthy skepticism that is ok too(despite that this is insulting).

The thing I can’t understand is why he keeps posting in this forum when he believes that we all intercytex cheerleaders? It seems he wants to become one too…


#14

» » This answer was posted to Bryans question of why do you think the HM
» hairs
» » will continue to grow forever
» »
» » yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» » where follicles are dht-resistant.

» »
» » typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
» »
» » the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses sometimes
» » more than half the hair in the occipital region
» »
» » oh but wait, I thought that this hair was DHT resistant and continues
» to
» » grow forever
» »
» » the lack of healthy skepticism on this board leads me to believe one of
» » two things is transpiring here
» »
» » 1) you guys are plants for ICX
» »
» » 2) you are actually that gullible that you believe everything these
» guys
» » pump out without questioning it.
» »
» » I think number 2 is more likely to be the case
»
»
»
» Hey Dippy…

»
» you really don’t bring anything to the table do you?

and what do forum members here bring, absolutely nothing except what IXC TELLS THEM,

You continue to say
» the same things over and over. I can’t really understand why you continue
» to post here. You have platformed yourself on the same position of
» “direction” time and time again. Many people have said to you the answer
» remains undetermined, but you take this as a complete failure not only by
» ICX but also by repliers trying to communicate with you. Why assume,
» presume and conclude upon something you yourself have no answer to? Why do
» you continue this endless pissing contest between posters and yourself? We
» have said we don’t know the answer for sure. The people who do know the
» answer have stated that it is non-serious. Does that make us believers?
» For most, it does Hanginginthere. So, you call us names like
» sheeple and cheerleaders for that reason. Not really that clever. Not a
» bit sir.

clever is not the point, the point is you guys cannot handle dissenting opinions, why do you care if someone doesnt jump on the cheerleader bus, HM research, if it is legit, will continue to progress, no matter what I say, so why do you care
»
» Do you really think you are accomplishing anything at all by telling
» people they are wrong? Better yet, what are you trying to accomplish???

I am stating my opinion, its a free world, you are stating yours, why does that bother you so much
»
» What are you trying to accomplish by challenging the majority of this
» forum?
»
»
»
» It seems to me that you yourself would like to be known as the sheppard,
» instead of ICX. You really, really want people to read your posts and say,
» “Man, he is sure logical. I bet Hangin’ is a real cool guy.” When this
» doesn’t happen, and people become angered by your CONTINUAL pessimism, you
» can’t help but lash out at those who contest your thoughts and ideas.
»
here is a newsflash, I dont care if I am popular, I state my opinions, If you dont like them, my question is, why do you read my posts? that seems very illogical. Are you just bored and want to engage in a battle? with someone you say knows nothing? now to me that is very odd

» What is most annoying is how much you actually permeate the forum with the
» same post over and over again. “Direction this” and “Direction
» that”…wrapped up by the famous “HM is a lost cause” type conclusion
» {usually delivered in some lackluster attempt at wit}. It is absurd and
» tired your broken record technique. You won’t destroy the hopes of this
» forum. Your POV has no backing. You think that screaming at the top of
» your lungs will purge an answer or cure. In the meantime, you attempt to
» steamroll any challenger in your way. Your tiny thoughts can never touch
» the optimism and constructive conversation that fuels this forum. Yet you

» continue to post…

constructive conversation is in the eye of the beholder. Personally I think this is a forum of cheerleaders of one company who are being strung along. I am free to post my opinion. This dissent grates the regular board members to no end, they view it as an attack on their fort, and they rally the troops to defend against the invader…quick quick call him a troll, call out the boiling oil, who is he to dare to challenge ICX, how dare he? who is this hangin any way

This board, is full of borderline cult members if you ask me. If you dont like my posts, ignore them. I find it very odd that so many of your cult members who think I know nothing continue to respond to me and try to debate the points. This validates that I am bringing up issues that are important.

Here is a clue…If you dont like the posts. Dont Click
EINSTEIN
»
» You continue to post…
»
»
» You won’t stop posting…
»
»
» post, post, post…
»
»
» Please stop posting.

learn to read

this post has nothing to do with direction

it has to do with hairs continuing to grow from HM because they are supposedly implanted from the side hairs which “continue to grow forever”

learn to read


#15

» » yes it is. the dp cells are taken from the occipital region,
» » where follicles are dht-resistant.

» »
» » typical ignorant HM cheerleader response
» »
» » the occipital region where? take a NW 7 for example, he loses
» sometimes
» » more than half the hair in the occipital region

»
» Well HanginInThere I for one will totally agree with you on this point.I
» deal with the public everytime I go to work.Over the years I’ve observed
» alsorts.I have noticed some older men,perhaps in their fifties and
» sixties,that have nearly no hair at the back.So yes from this point maybe
» if ICX-TRC does come out.It may still make sence to take Propecia or the
» alternatives to make sure the hair stays on your head.
»
» A lot of hair transplant doctors only state the hair will stay as long as
» the hair at the back,the occipital region,does,so there is something in
» the point you make.
»
» Looking at the trial information for ICX-TRC.I’m just glad I never managed
» to get on trials,not that I didn’t try,luckily everytime amounted to a big
» nothing.

yes as the posts above state, you could continue to get more injections if the hair from the occipital region falls out

the problem i had was stating that this occipital region hair continues to grow forever and is resistant to DHT
this is not true


#16

» My friend, don’t feed the trolls!
»
» The reply you just received more than indicates why.

troll = someone who doesnt join the ICX cheerleader squad

yes best not to respond
especially when you have no logical answer to any of the questions

it makes you appear like a fool

even more so that you already are


#17

»
» This guy will not stop posting this bullshiet so lets just ignore him.
»

Well said. We should all take note! Trolls thrive on the attention.


#18

» »
» » This guy will not stop posting this bullshiet so lets just ignore him.
» »
»
» Well said. We should all take note! Trolls thrive on the attention.

yes better to stop posting since you guys have no answers, absolutely nothing

all you can say is go read ICX website

better to just not respond it makes you appear less foolish