Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Cost

It is exciting, it may not be a cure but at least it is a new technology. My only concern is cost. With the US dollar tanking these days against the British Pound and Euro, I wonder how this will affect the pricing decision. If ICX is going to be as expensive as FUE hair transplant, then I will probably have to sit on the sideline for a while before flying to the UK.

My gut-feeling is that it will eventually be a mass-market thing even if not initially. They’ll probably make it more expensive than a round of Botox or something, but I’ll bet it ends up being less then FUE work costs right now.

IMHO the current hair transplant doctors could all make a lot more money if it was physically possible to do the work any faster/cheaper and lower the ultimate pricing. But they just can’t do it (w/o compromised results) because of the nature of the work. Charging $5-15 per graft is definitely pricing out A LOT of potential customers.

Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Terms of Use & Privacy

This is an advertising site for paid advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.