» Guys… why you want to search something bad where there isn’t?
» You think that a society it’s crazy to put in the market a product that
» could give serious problems to the patients?
» The fda it’s a standard official control procedure to give a certificate,
» but a product can also be sure without this. If Acell is on market, it’s
» because is sure. They have already tested it on humans, not for hairs, but
» it’s already sure proved…
I hear you. I know it is not approved for hair, no argument there. But if it was approved by the FDA for general wound healing, how come we could not find any FDA documentation about the product? That’s my question. One would think a simple search on google would come up with some FDA documentation for the product.
If you do a search for “Propecia FDA” that are tons of articles on that. It gives me some comfort level that the product was indeed passed by the FDA. But when I did a FDA search for Acell, nothing came up. That concerns me.
» » SAFETY remains the biggest question. FDA 510 clearance has nothing to
» do
» » with safety concerns. I couldn’t find anything that confirms that it
» has
» » been thoroughly tested in a large # of patients. The way they word
» their
» » website seems to suggest that it was only tested on a very selective
» group
» » of individuals, on a very small scale.
» »
» » The powder stimulates cell growth and is made from pigs. I echo the
» poster
» » who said he is worried about tumors or animal disease being passed onto
» » humans. What’s really worrisome is that they don’t have any FDA trial
» data
» » on their website.
»
» Guys… why you want to search something bad where there isn’t?
» You think that a society it’s crazy to put in the market a product that
» could give serious problems to the patients?
» The fda it’s a standard official control procedure to give a certificate,
» but a product can also be sure without this. If Acell is on market, it’s
» because is sure. They have already tested it on humans, not for hairs, but
» it’s already sure proved…
Do you seriously think that the FDA feels an obligation to protect consumers? The FDA is out to protect the pocketbooks of the members of the American Medical Association. The corrupt FDA officials endanger the publics lives in order to satisfy who really butters their bread…the Pharmaceutical companies and doctors.
there are many products that the FDA has made sure have been approved so they can be rushed to market, that ARE NOT SAFE. and they had to withdraw the products. Why? because they were not sufficiently tested.
Ever heard of Vioxx. had to be withdrawn from the market after it was proven that it increased the risk of heart attacks by 400 percent. Class action lawsuits and billions of dollars paid by the manufacturer later, it is still off the market
» » » SAFETY remains the biggest question. FDA 510 clearance has nothing to
» » do
» » » with safety concerns. I couldn’t find anything that confirms that it
» » has
» » » been thoroughly tested in a large # of patients. The way they word
» » their
» » » website seems to suggest that it was only tested on a very selective
» » group
» » » of individuals, on a very small scale.
» » »
» » » The powder stimulates cell growth and is made from pigs. I echo the
» » poster
» » » who said he is worried about tumors or animal disease being passed
» onto
» » » humans. What’s really worrisome is that they don’t have any FDA trial
» » data
» » » on their website.
» »
» » Guys… why you want to search something bad where there isn’t?
» » You think that a society it’s crazy to put in the market a product that
» » could give serious problems to the patients?
» » The fda it’s a standard official control procedure to give a
» certificate,
» » but a product can also be sure without this. If Acell is on market,
» it’s
» » because is sure. They have already tested it on humans, not for hairs,
» but
» » it’s already sure proved…
»
»
» Do you seriously think that the FDA feels an obligation to protect
» consumers? The FDA is out to protect the pocketbooks of the members of the
» American Medical Association. The corrupt FDA officials endanger the
» publics lives in order to satisfy who really butters their bread…the
» Pharmaceutical companies and doctors.
»
» there are many products that the FDA has made sure have been approved so
» they can be rushed to market, that ARE NOT SAFE. and they had to withdraw
» the products. Why? because they were not sufficiently tested.
»
» Ever heard of Vioxx. had to be withdrawn from the market after it was
» proven that it increased the risk of heart attacks by 400 percent. Class
» action lawsuits and billions of dollars paid by the manufacturer later, it
» is still off the market
Well then, I guess if this stuff works on hair, I’ll have to hurry up and use it in case it later proves unsafe and is banned.
» » » SAFETY remains the biggest question. FDA 510 clearance has nothing to
» » do
» » » with safety concerns. I couldn’t find anything that confirms that it
» » has
» » » been thoroughly tested in a large # of patients. The way they word
» » their
» » » website seems to suggest that it was only tested on a very selective
» » group
» » » of individuals, on a very small scale.
» » »
» » » The powder stimulates cell growth and is made from pigs. I echo the
» » poster
» » » who said he is worried about tumors or animal disease being passed
» onto
» » » humans. What’s really worrisome is that they don’t have any FDA trial
» » data
» » » on their website.
» »
» » Guys… why you want to search something bad where there isn’t?
» » You think that a society it’s crazy to put in the market a product that
» » could give serious problems to the patients?
» » The fda it’s a standard official control procedure to give a
» certificate,
» » but a product can also be sure without this. If Acell is on market,
» it’s
» » because is sure. They have already tested it on humans, not for hairs,
» but
» » it’s already sure proved…
»
»
» Do you seriously think that the FDA feels an obligation to protect
» consumers? The FDA is out to protect the pocketbooks of the members of the
» American Medical Association. The corrupt FDA officials endanger the
» publics lives in order to satisfy who really butters their bread…the
» Pharmaceutical companies and doctors.
»
» there are many products that the FDA has made sure have been approved so
» they can be rushed to market, that ARE NOT SAFE. and they had to withdraw
» the products. Why? because they were not sufficiently tested.
»
» Ever heard of Vioxx. had to be withdrawn from the market after it was
» proven that it increased the risk of heart attacks by 400 percent. Class
» action lawsuits and billions of dollars paid by the manufacturer later, it
» is still off the market
Well, that’s another subject, pleaes don’t hijack my thread.
Right now all I want is to see some FDA documentation for Acell wound healing products. I couldn’t find any.
John, call the company and ask them about it. I’m not affiliated with Acell and don’t claim to know everything about it. I am cautiously optimistic about the product but (as I’ve said before) make no guarantees (and neither does Acell).
I find it hard to believe that they could bring a product to market without FDA clearance, but it’s worth checking out. Again, I suggest you call them.
» we are discussing FDA APPROVAL ALSO SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT…
»
» I am the one who posted How can docs use it if its only been tested on
» animals…NOT YOU
»
» Where do you see that you started any thread, Please point that out?
»
» . This is not your thread . Anyone can start a thread , but that does not
» make it THEIR THREAD…but you didnt even START this
» thread…
»
» get over yourself
you know what , hanging, what you say is good stuff. but how you say it is “wrong”. you said before you laugh about guys in here coz they are so much away from every reality. thats the point. you enjoy telling people in here (who are maybe not realists) that they are wrong and you make it a way that is not very nice.
whatever, i guess i cant change you, right? so , well, i think aswell its risky to use acell because its not really tested for saftey issues. so for me, i will wait some years until i will use it (if it works for hair). im not as crazy as ahab and use it just to have it used and then get cancer from it. my life is worth more than my hair.
» John, call the company and ask them about it. I’m not affiliated with
» Acell and don’t claim to know everything about it. I am cautiously
» optimistic about the product but (as I’ve said before) make no guarantees
» (and neither does Acell).
»
» I find it hard to believe that they could bring a product to market
» without FDA clearance, but it’s worth checking out. Again, I suggest you
» call them.
Thanks Willy, I understand. I am very grateful to what you did, you are doing everyone a huge favor. I too am cautiously optimistic about this product.
» we are discussing FDA APPROVAL ALSO SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT…
»
» I am the one who posted How can docs use it if its only been tested on
» animals…NOT YOU
»
But don’t forget they also said it has been used on injured soldiers too, all I want is to find out the extent of human testings they have done. This could be the next generation hair transplant but on the other hand it’s also not worth getting cancer from it. If they had done relatively large scale trials on humans, then it gives some assurance that the product is relatively safe. That’s all I am after.
» » we are discussing FDA APPROVAL ALSO SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT…
» »
» » I am the one who posted How can docs use it if its only been tested
» on
» » animals…NOT YOU
» »
» » Where do you see that you started any thread, Please point that out?
» »
» » . This is not your thread . Anyone can start a thread , but that does
» not
» » make it THEIR THREAD…but you didnt even START this
» » thread…
» »
» » get over yourself
»
» you know what , hanging, what you say is good stuff. but how you say it is
» “wrong”. you said before you laugh about guys in here coz they are so much
» away from every reality. thats the point. you enjoy telling people in here
» (who are maybe not realists) that they are wrong and you make it a way that
» is not very nice.
»
» whatever, i guess i cant change you, right? so , well, i think aswell its
» risky to use acell because its not really tested for saftey issues. so for
» me, i will wait some years until i will use it (if it works for hair). im
» not as crazy as ahab and use it just to have it used and then get cancer
» from it. my life is worth more than my hair.
the post i made regarding the FDA not being out to protect consumers was not abrasive at all, go re read the post
i was abrasive to this guy who basically said DONT HIJACK MY THREAD because he was in my opinion, trying to dictate what others post, and saying he owned the thread
» If they had done relatively large
» scale trials on humans, then it gives some assurance that the product is
» relatively safe. That’s all I am after.
yes, it’s what i’m sayng… it’s not a certificate by the fda that make me sure about a medicine… everybody knows how is going the pharma market… you can buy medicine that everybody know is dangerous (like the Aulin). So don’t look bad something without certificate… a test on hundreds of human for me it’s more sure than an fda approval…
» we are discussing FDA APPROVAL ALSO SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT…
»
» I am the one who posted How can docs use it if its only been tested on
» animals…NOT YOU
»
» Where do you see that you started any thread, Please point that out?
»
» . This is not your thread . Anyone can start a thread , but that does not
» make it THEIR THREAD…but you didnt even START this
» thread…
»
» get over yourself
Damn. Even I have to admit, you just owned and humiliated johnp with that post.
» » we are discussing FDA APPROVAL ALSO SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT…
» »
» » I am the one who posted How can docs use it if its only been tested
» on
» » animals…NOT YOU
» »
» » Where do you see that you started any thread, Please point that out?
» »
» » . This is not your thread . Anyone can start a thread , but that does
» not
» » make it THEIR THREAD…but you didnt even START this
» » thread…
» »
» » get over yourself
»
» Damn. Even I have to admit, you just owned and humiliated johnp with that
» post.
I am mature enough not to care what he said. It doesn’t bother me in the least bit. I just want the truth about this Acell product.
» » » http://www.cookbiotech.com/products/index.html
» »
» » Are they the same as ACELL?
»
» SiS= small intestine submucosa.
»
» Yes, it is the same kind of product. It is based in the concept of ECM
» (extracellular matrix)
»
» I think Willy has posted here that the Acell product is a 2nd generation
» of this technology, and they are using it in powder form.
I’m not sure what the difference between the two products are. The people at Acell said that they have 5 growth factors in their product. That may be a difference. I would suggest any specific questions be directed to Acell. I don’t claim to be an expert on this stuff. I just want a full head of hair and hope that this stuff can help to provide it. The pictures looked too promising to ignore and after speaking with them, I had even more hope.
I don’t understand the below comments. How could it regenerate donor hair once it has been moved. There is no follicle remaining if it was stripped or fue’d. Therefore, I fail to understand how it could provide for unlimited donor. One would think the approach people are talking about would need to be applied to dead/dormant follicles in balding areas. While, use on donor areas would seem to be limited to scar healing. Even that would be a win in my book!
the researchers at Acell are cautiously optimistic that it will regenerate donor hair
yes, I posted some posts about the company called “cookbiotech”, which has already launched several products to the market, for humans, and with FDA permission.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.