Why is Armani selling?
» http://www.medhunters.com/job/919480.html
They have to be the most entertaining clinic in the world, there is always “something” going on at the Armanic clinic.
No reason to jump to any sinister conclusions right off the bat. There’s a dozen different legitimate reasons they might be selling an office.
For all we know, they might just be moving to a larger one in the same zip.
» No reason to jump to any sinister conclusions right off the bat. There’s a
» dozen different legitimate reasons they might be selling an office.
»
» For all we know, they might just be moving to a larger one in the same
» zip.
the ad says they are selling the practice. the practice!
I highly doubt that they are selling the “practice”. The practice in Beverly Hills, but not their namesake or alike. I’m sure the recession is affecting Armani, as it has every business, and he’s trying to cut costs where he can. If he were selling his “business” altogether, we would all know about it.
» Hes s most likely going back to toronto!!
This is correct, he is just consolidating his work to Toronto. Apparently his business manager suggested he go back to his “roots” of performing procedures himself rather than having techs do all the work on many different people each day. This will be good, I think in about a year we will start seeing more consistently good results from armani.
I think thats a very good idea!
I never really never understood why he left Toronto in the first place.
» » Hes s most likely going back to toronto!!
»
» This is correct, he is just consolidating his work to Toronto. Apparently
» his business manager suggested he go back to his “roots” of performing
» procedures himself rather than having techs do all the work on many
» different people each day. This will be good, I think in about a year we
» will start seeing more consistently good results from armani.
does that mean the price will go up too?
I wonder how they’re gonna tout the improvement without admitting that they’ve been doing some subpar jobs lately with heavy tech usage.
» » » Hes s most likely going back to toronto!!
» »
» » This is correct, he is just consolidating his work to Toronto.
» Apparently
» » his business manager suggested he go back to his “roots” of performing
» » procedures himself rather than having techs do all the work on many
» » different people each day. This will be good, I think in about a year
» we
» » will start seeing more consistently good results from armani.
»
» does that mean the price will go up too?
That could be a troublesome side effect. The overall consistency comes back but at what price? (literally)
It’s only a problem if you insist on going to an Armani clinic for your HT work.
Other FUE docs are producing decent consistency (finally) without the prices being all that huge.
Dr. Armani had been spending most of his time in Toronto because of scheduling reasons, so it made sense to consolidate to the Toronto clinic. Currently our schedule is booked full into mid summer, the less travel time between the two offices will allow us to free up more dates for scheduling.
As far as consistent FUE results I still ask you to name a clinic who does it better. I have posted countless results on this message board, more so then any other clinic. As well, we have more happy patients sharing their results here in this community then any other doctors that I can see.
For those of you who have not been following the boards long enough I have included some recent Armani FUE results below.
Yeah, yeah. More cases online than average equals more success in the real world than average? Or maybe just harder sales-pitching than average, which is not the same thing.
I voiced my opinion that there are other FUE clinics that are just as good as Armani’s work. Deal.
» I wonder how they’re gonna tout the improvement without admitting that
» they’ve been doing some subpar jobs lately with heavy tech usage.
What do you mean by this cal? Every top clinic I know of uses techs for the same reasons? Why do you mention this trying to make Armani look bad knowing it’s an irrelivent statement?
» Yeah, yeah. More cases online than average equals more success in the real
» world than average? Or maybe just harder sales-pitching than average,
» which is not the same thing.
»
»
» I voiced my opinion that there are other FUE clinics that are just as good
» as Armani’s work. Deal.
This is your quote from your previous post on this thread cal,
“It’s only a problem if you insist on going to an Armani clinic for your HT work.”
But now you’re saying that other clinics are producing decent results JUST AS GOOD as Armani. So first he was garbage but now the other clinics are worth looking into because they’re JUST AS GOOD AS ARMANI. I see a major contradiction here.
I know you’re very imformative cal and I always consider the information you provide in your posts. But lately I just don’t understand why you’ve become so anti-armani without legitamate reason.
» What do you mean by this cal? Every top clinic I know of uses techs for
» the same reasons? Why do you mention this trying to make Armani look bad
» knowing it’s an irrelivent statement?
Just to elaborate. Techs assist with the surgery, this happens at all clinics. Our techs have gone through a vigorous training program and have been with the clinic for years. They specialize in FUE extraction, just like Techs who work at strip clinics dissect each graft under magnification with strip.
To say other top clinics do not have specialized techs performing certain duties would be incorrect.
All the results posted above were created by Dr. Armani and our highly trained staff. The same goes with the FUE hairlines below……
Pats, while you are at it, can you also tell me what size needles Dr. Armani uses in the recipient?
» I wonder how they’re gonna tout the improvement without admitting that
» they’ve been doing some subpar jobs lately with heavy tech usage.
What do you mean by this cal? Every top clinic I know of uses techs for the same reasons? Why do you mention this trying to make Armani look bad knowing it’s an irrelivent statement?
Tech usage, schmech usage.
Results are the bottom line. How they get those results doesn’t matter as long as they happen.
We could delete “from tech usage” out of that sentence of mine back there and it doesn’t change the core issue I was raising with the comment.
Whatever. I didn’t mean to distract the thread.