Zohar has nothing to do with the research what so ever! I have no idea why anyone thinks that. Her job is to get as much investment into Follica as she possbily can. The payoff for success is obvious.
When Doc Cot discovered what he did do you think Zohar was the only business person that approached him? There were probably loads and he went with her. Why? Probably she could offer him something no one else could - money, facilities, research group etc
She has the links with various Pharm and finance to see Follicas research through whatever trials are required. She has done well to get finance of some $16 mill so far!
They have appointed various people with lots of medical quals to take the research forwards. Zohar has her own role but it certainly isn’t anything science based!
I have no problem with that. The problem is that she is being described on Puretech website as a superintelligent inventor-researcher female.
Why are they doing this? Why this strange obsession to show her as something that she is not?
» Zohar has nothing to do with the research what so ever! I have no idea why
» anyone thinks that. Her job is to get as much investment into Follica as
» she possbily can. The payoff for success is obvious.
»
» When Doc Cot discovered what he did do you think Zohar was the only
» business person that approached him? There were probably loads and he went
» with her. Why? Probably she could offer him something no one else could -
» money, facilities, research group etc
»
» She has the links with various Pharm and finance to see Follicas research
» through whatever trials are required. She has done well to get finance of
» some $16 mill so far!
»
» They have appointed various people with lots of medical quals to take the
» research forwards. Zohar has her own role but it certainly isn’t anything
» science based!
» People don’t blow a gasket when someone refers to a guy as a “mama’s boy.”
»
»
» What if he had said “trust fund boy” about a man? Would that have been so
» offensive?
it is amusing when they call me funny names instead of debating
» I have no problem with that. The problem is that she is being described on
» Puretech website as a superintelligent inventor-researcher female.
» Why are they doing this? Why this strange obsession to show her as
» something that she is not?
There are US government grants for “women-owned businesses”. If a business can show significant ownership or control by a woman (or women), it can qualify for substantial assistance in the form of grants and awards from the federal government. This could be why they are putting Daphne Zohar out “front and center”.
I’m not denigrating anyone here, I’m just stating what the policy of the US government is.
» I have no problem with that. The problem is that she is being described on
» Puretech website as a superintelligent inventor-researcher female.
» Why are they doing this? Why this strange obsession to show her as
» something that she is not?
it’s called advertising (teasing, seducing, whatever you name it). Welcome to the real world buddy …
» » I have no problem with that. The problem is that she is being described
» on
» » Puretech website as a superintelligent inventor-researcher female.
» » Why are they doing this? Why this strange obsession to show her as
» » something that she is not?
»
»
» There are US government grants for “women-owned businesses”. If a
» business can show significant ownership or control by a woman (or women),
» it can qualify for substantial assistance in the form of grants and awards
» from the federal government. This could be why they are putting Daphne
» Zohar out “front and center”.
»
» I’m not denigrating anyone here, I’m just stating what the policy of the
» US government is.
very interesting. well, we don’t know if this is the case, but I wouldn’t be surprised.
Also, it is possible that Puretech is receiving public money just for being a R&D company.
ok, right now I don’t feel the need for more criticism or speculation against them, but if they keep missing previous “promises”, I will certainly be motivated for more investigation.
» » I have no problem with that. The problem is that she is being described
» on
» » Puretech website as a superintelligent inventor-researcher female.
» » Why are they doing this? Why this strange obsession to show her as
» » something that she is not?
»
» it’s called advertising (teasing, seducing, whatever you name it). Welcome
» to the real world buddy …
we will see if Follica’s hair is real, or as virtual as Zohar’s curriculum.
Went to buy a new pc the other day, but it turned out the store manager hadn’t mastered the physics of transistors, so I got out of there quick. Total scam.
» Went to buy a new pc the other day, but it turned out the store manager
» hadn’t mastered the physics of transistors, so I got out of there quick.
» Total scam.
Yeah, I don’t buy my computers from any place that doesn’t know how to smelt their own copper and gold for the circuit boards.
I refuse to buy my groceries from anyplace the stock clerks can’t replicate the food processing aspects of every single item on their shelves.
I also don’t trust any family doctor that can’t manufacture their own pharmaceuticals from scratch.
According to spanish dude… people that don’t understand every single aspect of their field are "nothing. They’re scammers.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.