» why do they want to complete both the clinical trials and commercialisation
» after phase 2 ?
»
» why not just complete the clinical trials and leave it at that ? The fact
» that they also want to complete commercialisation tells us something.
Where do they say that they plan to “complete commercialization” after phase 2?
They say the opposite:
We do not intend to finance the continuation of clinical and commercial development of ICX-TRC beyond the current Phase II trial and shall seek to sign a partner
<<<
they’re looking for a partner for TRC, whats the big deal
the same is happening with ICX SKN
“It is our intention to seek a partner to commercialise the product, as a minimum in the US market. This is likely to be achieved after the Phase II data are available”
nathan, I think you are answering in the wrong place of the thread.
Do you have “thread view” activated?
» they’re looking for a partner for TRC, whats the big deal
»
» the same is happening with ICX SKN
»
» “It is our intention to seek a partner to commercialise the product, as a
» minimum in the US market. This is likely to be achieved after the Phase II
» data are available”
»
»
» They’ve already done this with vavaleta
well, it is not the same.
For TRC, there was always a plan for commercialization partnerships,
and we didn’t complain .
But what they have said now, in the new report is different.
» nathan, I think you are answering in the wrong place of the thread.
» Do you have “thread view” activated?
»
» » they’re looking for a partner for TRC, whats the big deal
» »
» » the same is happening with ICX SKN
» »
» » “It is our intention to seek a partner to commercialise the product, as
» a
» » minimum in the US market. This is likely to be achieved after the Phase
» II
» » data are available”
» »
» »
» » They’ve already done this with vavaleta
»
» well, it is not the same.
» For TRC, there was always a plan for commercialization partnerships,
» and we didn’t complain .
»
» But what they have said now, in the new report is totally different.
Its not totally different, there is a line that reads:
“Intercytex has granted Bosley, the largest chain of hair transplant clinics in the US, an option to negotiate distribution rights to the product.”
which means Bosley could still end up selling a final product.
The key word for me here is Negotiate, it seems to me like Bosley have the right to put the first offer in, but ICX aren’t obligated to accept???
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.