Scientist Discover Protein Responsible for MPB - Huge News

Researchers have identified the protein responsible for male pattern baldness, raising expectations that an effective treatment for the most common cause of hair loss in men is on the horizon.

Male pattern baldness affects 8 out of 10 men and causes the hair follicles to shrink and produce microscopic hairs, which grow for a shorter duration of time than normal hairs.

“We looked at bald scalps last year and saw the hair follicles were still present,” senior author Dr. George Cotsarelis, chair and professor of Dermatology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, told FoxNews.com. “So we inferred there was either a lack of an activator [to spur hair growth] or the presence of an inhibitor.”

Using microrays, Cotsarelis and his colleagues took tissue samples from the scalps of men who suffered from androgenetic alopecia and measured levels of different genes. The samples were taken from both bald spots on the scalps and spots with hair.

The researchers found the bald spots had abnormally high levels of a protein called Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)—nearly three times the amount present in the scalp areas with hair.

Once the researchers identified the protein, they did further functional tests to study what effect PGD2 had on hair in mice and hair follicles grown in a lab.

“It really decreased the growth,” Cotsarelis said, adding that the findings are “completely new.”

“Nobody had any idea that PGD2 had anything to do with hair growth,” he said. “We knew there were other prostaglandins that could encourage hair growth. Take Latisse, which uses a prostaglandin (F2alpha) to lengthen eyelashes. That was found entirely by accident. Patients with glaucoma were using eye-drops that contained the prostaglandin and noticed their eyelashes growing.”

PGD2, on the other hand, is an analog of F2alpha, meaning it works in the opposite way and causes hair to grow shorter.

However, for the protein to inhibit hair growth, it has to first bind to a receptor (GPR44). This receptor, according to Cotsarelis, is the target for future treatments to combat baldness.

“We had genetically modified mice that lacked the GPR44 receptors for the PGD2 protein,” explained Cotsarelis. “In normal mice, PGD2 inhibited hair growth, but in mice with non-functional receptors, the hair grew fine.”

“The inhibitory effects of PGD2 act through the receptor, so what we want to do is block the receptor,” he said.

Some compounds targeting the GPR44 receptor are already underway in other labs to treat other health issues such as asthma. In addition to regulating hair growth, prostaglandins also control cell growth and constricting and dilating smooth muscle tissue.

Cotsarelis believes this latest finding means a topical treatment for male pattern baldness may also be on the way soon.

“Absolutely,” he said. “Our research was so targeted toward figuring what was wrong—studying people who have baldness disorder—that by discovering this receptor I think there’s a really good chance of developing a treatment not too far down the road.”

Read more: Scientists identify protein responsible for male pattern baldness | Fox News

» “Absolutely,” he said. “Our research was so targeted toward figuring what
» was wrong—studying people who have baldness disorder—that by discovering
» this receptor I think there’s a really good chance of developing a
» treatment not too far down the road.”

Only five years away…

Nothing concrete will be before that anyway. If its 5 years away, I think many people would be happy. I give it 3 years now that they have discovered the specific protein.

» Nothing concrete will be before that anyway. If its 5 years away, I think
» many people would be happy. I give it 3 years now that they have discovered
» the specific protein.

this is huge news !!

LET THE ASSTALKERS and EXPERTS DOWNTALK this and SAY:

Sounds very confident and as if the solution is already available.

This does not sound like it would help people who have already lost hair where the follicles are dead.

"I think there’s a really good chance of developing a treatment not too far down the road.

Wasn’t Cotserellis saying the same thing back in 2008 in that interview where he revealed he had found mice growing hair during injury recovery.

how about making a topical solution with laropiprant?

» Scientists identify protein responsible for male pattern baldness | Fox News

http://health.msn.com/health-topics/skin-and-hair/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100288313

Dr. Sanusi Umar, a dermatologist in Redondo Beach, Calif. and associate faculty at University of California, Los Angeles, said it’s long been known that prostaglandins are involved with hair growth, while this study shows that the opposite may also be true.

For example, Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) is a synthetic prostaglandin (mimicking PGF2) that encourages eyelash growth, while Rogaine (minoxidil) is thought to work by promoting the activity of another prostaglandin, PGE2, Umar noted.

“This study tells the other side of the story,” he said.

Yet, Umar urged men not to toss out their Rogaine yet. “Yes, this may open another front from which hair loss may be treated. It is not likely to be the panacea, however,” he added.

There are likely multiple prostaglandins involved with inhibiting or promoting hair growth, he pointed out. Steroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs also inhibit PGD2 “but have not been shown to consistently grow hair,” Umar noted.

“It is more likely that a number of end factors contribute to hair loss with factors like PGD2 inhibiting hair growth and others such as PGE2 and PGF2 promoting it,” he said. “PGD2 inhibition may emerge as part of a combined approach used in combination with agents that work via different mechanisms . . . as a more effective approach to hair loss treatment.”
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

His analysis is not bad - for a hair transplant doctor.

It’s a wonder why they only just realised now to compare gene samples from the balding area and the non affected area with hair…

Maybe this is also why Follica haven’t had any new news, old mate Costeralis has been working on this instead.

But this article seems to say that drugs that these types of drugs are already in late stage development and they are not showing signs of growing hair. These drugs are almost ready to come to market but hair growth is not being seen in test subjects taking these types of drugs.

» Research identifies inhibitor causing male pattern baldness and target for hair-loss treatments
» Sounds very confident and as if the solution is already available.

I read an article that said that drugs that do what needs to be done are in late stage development. That would mean those drugs are in phase 2 or 3 clinical trials. That means these drugs would hit the market in maybe 1.5 to 2 years.

The drugs are being tested for other medical problems, not hair loss.
Unfortunately the article also says that the subjects in the clinical trials are not seeing hair growth. Check out this link. Drugs that do what we would want them to do are in late stage development but not showing hair growth if I read the article correctly. I perused it quickly so not sure.

» Nothing concrete will be before that anyway. If its 5 years away, I think
» many people would be happy. I give it 3 years now that they have discovered
» the specific protein.

I WANT IT ON MY DESK NOW IN TEN MINUTES

:smiley:

» His analysis is not bad - for a hair transplant doctor.

Dr Umar is also a dermatologist as well, like Dr Bernstein.

» But this article seems to say that drugs that these types of drugs are
» already in late stage development and they are not showing signs of growing
» hair. These drugs are almost ready to come to market but hair growth is not
» being seen in test subjects taking these types of drugs.
»
» http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/merck-drug-homes-new-baldness-target/2012-03-22

These things may need to be concentrated topically to have a good effect.

» » But this article seems to say that drugs that these types of drugs are
» » already in late stage development and they are not showing signs of
» growing
» » hair. These drugs are almost ready to come to market but hair growth is
» not
» » being seen in test subjects taking these types of drugs.
» »
» »
» http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/merck-drug-homes-new-baldness-target/2012-03-22
»
» These things may need to be concentrated topically to have a good effect.

I don’t know what to make of this news. It could be something really big that we could exploit right now. Remember since it is in late stage development that means we already know that it is likely very safe. For example, if similar drugs are in phase 3, nearing completion of phase 3, then that means it has already completed safety of phase 1 and phase 2 and is almost done with safety for phase 3. That would look like a lock for safety. If similar drugs are deep into phase two with no safety problems then that would be a pretty good indication that it is probably safe and we should be trying to figure out how we could start using it as soon as it hits the marketplace.

» » » But this article seems to say that drugs that these types of drugs are
» » » already in late stage development and they are not showing signs of
» » growing
» » » hair. These drugs are almost ready to come to market but hair growth
» is
» » not
» » » being seen in test subjects taking these types of drugs.
» » »
» » »
» »
» http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/merck-drug-homes-new-baldness-target/2012-03-22
» »
» » These things may need to be concentrated topically to have a good
» effect.
»
» I don’t know what to make of this news. It could be something really big
» that we could exploit right now. Remember since it is in late stage
» development that means we already know that it is likely very safe. For
» example, if similar drugs are in phase 3, nearing completion of phase 3,
» then that means it has already completed safety of phase 1 and phase 2 and
» is almost done with safety for phase 3. That would look like a lock for
» safety. If similar drugs are deep into phase two with no safety problems
» then that would be a pretty good indication that it is probably safe and we
» should be trying to figure out how we could start using it as soon as it
» hits the marketplace.

Merck is testing laropiprant as a flushing inhibitor to be administered with niacin. Allschwil, Switzerland-based Actelion’s setipiprant is being studied as a treatment for allergic inflammation of nasal pathways. Both therapies are in the final phase of testing generally needed for regulatory approval.

» I read an article that said that drugs that do what needs to be done are in
» late stage development.

» The drugs are being tested for other medical problems, not hair loss.
» Unfortunately the article also says

But to what degree are the researchers looking for any hair growth or loss?

If their observations are just casual, then it would mean the drug does not produce dramatic effects on hair.

But if the drug added some density, say 20% more hair, such an increase might go unnoticed if researchers just casually compare what a test subject’s hair looks like today with what the researcher seems to remember it looked like months and months ago.

From the article:

“Merck isn’t studying the anti-flushing drug in hair loss, said Ian McConnell, a Merck spokesman, in a telephone interview. “We haven’t seen any signals” in patient trials that the therapy might reduce baldness, he said.”

» Research shows Merck's prospective flushing drug may have another use: preventing baldness - nj.com
»
»
» From the article:
»
» “Merck isn’t studying the anti-flushing drug in hair loss, said Ian
» McConnell, a Merck spokesman, in a telephone interview. “We haven’t seen
» any signals” in patient trials that the therapy might reduce baldness, he
» said.”

But we do not know if the subjects in the study are people that would benefit from the hair growth aspect of this drug. For example, they may all be too old or none of them may be missing hair. we do not know anything about the patient subjects who were being given this medicine for a totally different reason rather than hair growth.

» » » » But this article seems to say that drugs that these types of drugs
» are
» » » » already in late stage development and they are not showing signs of
» » » growing
» » » » hair. These drugs are almost ready to come to market but hair growth
» » is
» » » not
» » » » being seen in test subjects taking these types of drugs.
» » » »
» » » »
» » »
» »
» http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/merck-drug-homes-new-baldness-target/2012-03-22
» » »
» » » These things may need to be concentrated topically to have a good
» » effect.
» »
» » I don’t know what to make of this news. It could be something really
» big
» » that we could exploit right now. Remember since it is in late stage
» » development that means we already know that it is likely very safe. For
» » example, if similar drugs are in phase 3, nearing completion of phase 3,
» » then that means it has already completed safety of phase 1 and phase 2
» and
» » is almost done with safety for phase 3. That would look like a lock for
» » safety. If similar drugs are deep into phase two with no safety
» problems
» » then that would be a pretty good indication that it is probably safe and
» we
» » should be trying to figure out how we could start using it as soon as it
» » hits the marketplace.
»
»
» Merck is testing laropiprant as a flushing inhibitor to be administered
» with niacin. Allschwil, Switzerland-based Actelion’s setipiprant is being
» studied as a treatment for allergic inflammation of nasal pathways. Both
» therapies are in the final phase of testing generally needed for regulatory
» approval.

Extended release nicotinic acid/laropiprant (Tredaptive®) is accepted for restricted use within NHS Scotland.