This patient had scarring in the recipient area as well as pitting that had to be treated. The fact that you would refer to a case like this as “you simply added more grafts” illustrates a lack of understanding regarding the surgical aspect of a hair restoration procedure.
No, it means that I can discern the difference between a “repair” and a second procedure. Calling procedures like this a “repair” is like me calling my garbage man a “hero” for picking up the trash in sub-zero temperatures.
It’s admirable that my garbage man gets up at 4:00 AM to work in such bitterly cold temperatures, but it does not make him a hero, nor does that constitute a repair.
This patient needed to have grafts removed via FUE as well as a repair procedure. You can speak about this case like you know exactly what was done, or like you saw him in person to inspect him, but the fact is you have not. I have met this patient in person before and after his procedure and this patient certainly qualifies as a repair case.
I am not sure what your overall point is, but thank you for your comments.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.