Sorry, your newer photos show absolutely nothing interesting.
Case 1: Hair is cut longer in the after photo, so comparison is not fair.
Case2: hair is dyed darker in the after photo, and in any case, no improvement can be seen.
Case 3: could be some improvement, who knows, the hair is probably longer in the after photo and the combing is better in the after photo.
If you really want to present proof, you will have to treat a patient who cuts his hair very short (under 5mm long), so that individual hairs can be seen. Like Histogen does. Also, before and after photos should have the same haircut length.
Well, if you had a case of super-improvement, then it wouldn’t be necessary to be so careful. But after seeing these photos, I doubt that you have such patients.
Do you have high resolution photos of 3rd case (hairline area)?
» Hi there!
»
» I’m the marketing manager at Recoverup, and I was sent here by a customer
» who emailed us and suggested I join this forum to get the word out.
»
» It seems there’s some concern about our company’s ability to communicate/
» market ourselves properly. And to be honest, I think we’ve made some
» mistakes in our launch.
»
» A key complaint I’ve seen on this forum about our company is that we
» showed pictures that were damp in the before and dry in the after. This
» was because the patient’s scalps were dampened before stem cell injection.
» The Dr. chose those pictures because he felt it showed the follicle density
» clearly. However, SpanishDude pointed out to us that this was misleading,
» and we stopped using those pictures immediately, and found before pictures
» of the relevant clients that were dry. These are the same people, just a
» different selection of pictures. I enclose them here.
»
»
»
»
»
» However, I can say the treatment really works. It’s ethical, safe and
» effective. (We only use stem cells taken from your own body - no embryo’s
» or animal stem cells used).
»
» It’s not a “miracle grow” - but it does help significantly with thinning
» or patchy hair. Dr. Pan, whom I’m posting this on behalf of, has empirical
» data showing at least 40% improvement in treated areas. That said, if you
» are completely bald in a particular area, a hair transplant may still be
» your best option.
»
» Have a good day!
»
» Hamish Stewart
»
»
» » Thanks tricky.
» » It seems that they are not even able to do the crudest form of
» » photographic manipulation.
» » are they operating in the UK??
» » isn’t there any way to have the authorities to chase them down?
» »
» » I am amazed at this situation. We are not talking about thirld world
» » countries. We have charlatans in USA, UK, Holland, claiming all kind of
» » miracles without decent proof, and they are SELLING these procedures,
» and
» » the authorities do nothing. Maybe they are too busy being bribed by the
» big
» » pharma companies.
» » This is a circus, a joke. Our health and legal system is a disaster.
» »
» »
» » » Well, it has taken me over a month of badgering, asking, pleading and
» » » practically begging the rep at Recoverup to send me something,
» ANYTHING
» » to
» » » prove this amazing technique. Email after email of dodging sending
» » those
» » » pictures, I finally sent an email questioning the moral compass of
» the
» » » company for not having any pictures available at the drop of a hat if
» » this
» » » product was so amazing… Low and behold, the next day, the guy sent
» me
» » the
» » » following:
» » »
» » »
» » »
» » »
» » »
» » » I hope these images appear… After receiving them, I wrote the rep a
» » » scathing email chastising him for the bs pictures. Wet hair before,
» » dry
» » » hair after. More importantly, the fact that these pictures show ZERO
» » » improvement. I’m surprised he wrote me back after the rampage I went
» » on…
» » » He said nothing of relevence. I am done chasing this garbage down…