Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Phase II only working for 75% of people


#1

I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a 75% of people.

Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1 out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or me paying for nothing.

Not a good prospect in my opinion.


#2

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

Where did you read?


#3

Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones who have received a low dosage.

Also, I’m not too sure how reliable this information that you have read is. ICX being a public company will make statements to their investors first.

» » I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» » 75% of people.
» »
» » Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» » out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you
» or
» » me paying for nothing.
» »
» » Not a good prospect in my opinion.
»
» Where did you read?


#4

» Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones who
» have received a low dosage.
»

phase I is usually the dose escalation (safety)
phase II is for eficacy


#5

» » Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones
» who
» » have received a low dosage.
» »
»
» phase I is usually the dose escalation (safety)
» phase II is for eficacy

again, which is the source?


#6

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

Where exactly did you read this information because it means nothing coming from you alone. Do you have this information endorsed by Intercytex at all??


#7

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

aren’t you referring to phase I?
it grew hair in 5 out of 7 people.


#8

I’m pretty sure he’s referring to phase I. I recently read an article where they talked about phase I working on just under 75%. And I’ll bet that’s what he’s referring to.

Even if he were referring to Phase II (which requires a link to be believed), from what I’ve read, there haven’t been enough people treated for 75% to really mean anything. The sample size isn’t big enough yet.


#9

» I’m pretty sure he’s referring to phase I. I recently read an article
» where they talked about phase I working on just under 75%. And I’ll bet
» that’s what he’s referring to.
»
» Even if he were referring to Phase II (which requires a link to be
» believed), from what I’ve read, there haven’t been enough people treated
» for 75% to really mean anything. The sample size isn’t big enough yet.

quote. all


#10

It was in one message in this forum.

I understood it was about phase II but it could well be about phase I.


#11

» It was in one message in this forum.
»
» I understood it was about phase II but it could well be about phase I.

5/7*100 = 72%, you must be referring to phase one study. Nonetheless, it’s fair well possible phase two will provide the same results.


#12

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

I’ve looked everywhere! I cannot find any reference to a report, note, document etc which makes reference to a 75 percent success rate claim (whatever that means)for phase 2. I am sure you have been misinformed.
For what it’s worth, I am very confident we will get some interesting reports within the next month or so.

Regards,
Facts 21


#13

» » I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» » 75% of people.
» »
» » Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» » out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you
» or
» » me paying for nothing.
» »
» » Not a good prospect in my opinion.
»
»
» I’ve looked everywhere! I cannot find any reference to a report, note,
» document etc which makes reference to a 75 percent success rate claim
» (whatever that means)for phase 2. I am sure you have been misinformed.
» For what it’s worth, I am very confident we will get some interesting
» reports within the next month or so.
»
» Regards,
» Facts 21

Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or cloning for decades.


#14

HM is close! These company’s are real and along with their backers they would not be pouring mass amounts of money into a project that is decades away. These are real sceintists, with real testing subjects. In a matter of months we will know just how close we are to this world changing procedure. :smiley:


#15

» Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or
» cloning for decades.

Why?

In this year we will know how close we are to this world changing procedure. You have to explain why you don’t think…


#16

» » Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or
» » cloning for decades.
»
» Why?
»
» In this year we will know how close we are to this world changing
» procedure. You have to explain why you don’t think…

Why you care what he thinks :slight_smile:
Most of the guys that had a transplant recently they say the same thing…they wouldnt have a transplant if they thought its near and propably their doctor said the same when they asked.


#17

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

You really had my hopes up for a while, but it appears its phase-I


#18

I 'll agree with thegreek.

Just imagine how you would feel if you had spend some bucks on HT’s one year before and with the same bucks you could pay intercytex’s HM!!! :crying:

Can Wait for the October’s preliminary phase II results!!! and of course 2008’s small scale commercialization…:ok:


#19

Spanish Dude is one a’ them-there immigrantes, a Hispaniard. He’s one a’ them Latino hombres, with one a’ them whattayacall wet backs. He’s one a’ them refried bean-eatin’, back-a-the-pickup ridin’, sombrero-wearin’, border-jumpin’, drywall-layin’, 26-to-the-house livin’, ranchera-dancin’, low-ridin’, car-radio-blastin’ no-speaka-de-Engleesh, swarthy-skinned Latins from South a’ the Border.

How ya doin’ Spanish Dude? :wink: