Phase II only working for 75% of people

I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a 75% of people.

Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1 out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or me paying for nothing.

Not a good prospect in my opinion.

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

Where did you read?

Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones who have received a low dosage.

Also, I’m not too sure how reliable this information that you have read is. ICX being a public company will make statements to their investors first.

» » I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» » 75% of people.
» »
» » Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» » out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you
» or
» » me paying for nothing.
» »
» » Not a good prospect in my opinion.
»
» Where did you read?

» Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones who
» have received a low dosage.
»

phase I is usually the dose escalation (safety)
phase II is for eficacy

» » Phase 2 is a variable dosage study right? Perhaps the 1/4 are the ones
» who
» » have received a low dosage.
» »
»
» phase I is usually the dose escalation (safety)
» phase II is for eficacy

again, which is the source?

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

Where exactly did you read this information because it means nothing coming from you alone. Do you have this information endorsed by Intercytex at all??

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

aren’t you referring to phase I?
it grew hair in 5 out of 7 people.

I’m pretty sure he’s referring to phase I. I recently read an article where they talked about phase I working on just under 75%. And I’ll bet that’s what he’s referring to.

Even if he were referring to Phase II (which requires a link to be believed), from what I’ve read, there haven’t been enough people treated for 75% to really mean anything. The sample size isn’t big enough yet.

» I’m pretty sure he’s referring to phase I. I recently read an article
» where they talked about phase I working on just under 75%. And I’ll bet
» that’s what he’s referring to.
»
» Even if he were referring to Phase II (which requires a link to be
» believed), from what I’ve read, there haven’t been enough people treated
» for 75% to really mean anything. The sample size isn’t big enough yet.

quote. all

It was in one message in this forum.

I understood it was about phase II but it could well be about phase I.

» It was in one message in this forum.
»
» I understood it was about phase II but it could well be about phase I.

5/7*100 = 72%, you must be referring to phase one study. Nonetheless, it’s fair well possible phase two will provide the same results.

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

I’ve looked everywhere! I cannot find any reference to a report, note, document etc which makes reference to a 75 percent success rate claim (whatever that means)for phase 2. I am sure you have been misinformed.
For what it’s worth, I am very confident we will get some interesting reports within the next month or so.

Regards,
Facts 21

» » I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» » 75% of people.
» »
» » Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» » out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you
» or
» » me paying for nothing.
» »
» » Not a good prospect in my opinion.
»
»
» I’ve looked everywhere! I cannot find any reference to a report, note,
» document etc which makes reference to a 75 percent success rate claim
» (whatever that means)for phase 2. I am sure you have been misinformed.
» For what it’s worth, I am very confident we will get some interesting
» reports within the next month or so.
»
» Regards,
» Facts 21

Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or cloning for decades.

HM is close! These company’s are real and along with their backers they would not be pouring mass amounts of money into a project that is decades away. These are real sceintists, with real testing subjects. In a matter of months we will know just how close we are to this world changing procedure. :smiley:

» Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or
» cloning for decades.

Why?

In this year we will know how close we are to this world changing procedure. You have to explain why you don’t think…

» » Dont get too excited, I dont think were going to see any sort of HM or
» » cloning for decades.
»
» Why?
»
» In this year we will know how close we are to this world changing
» procedure. You have to explain why you don’t think…

Why you care what he thinks :slight_smile:
Most of the guys that had a transplant recently they say the same thing…they wouldnt have a transplant if they thought its near and propably their doctor said the same when they asked.

» I think I read some days ago that phase II was going ok and working on a
» 75% of people.
»
» Nobody has commented on this but I think that 75% is not good enough. 1
» out of 4 will pay ICX for nothing. Chances are high that it will be you or
» me paying for nothing.
»
» Not a good prospect in my opinion.

You really had my hopes up for a while, but it appears its phase-I

I 'll agree with thegreek.

Just imagine how you would feel if you had spend some bucks on HT’s one year before and with the same bucks you could pay intercytex’s HM!!! :crying:

Can Wait for the October’s preliminary phase II results!!! and of course 2008’s small scale commercialization…:ok:

Spanish Dude is one a’ them-there immigrantes, a Hispaniard. He’s one a’ them Latino hombres, with one a’ them whattayacall wet backs. He’s one a’ them refried bean-eatin’, back-a-the-pickup ridin’, sombrero-wearin’, border-jumpin’, drywall-layin’, 26-to-the-house livin’, ranchera-dancin’, low-ridin’, car-radio-blastin’ no-speaka-de-Engleesh, swarthy-skinned Latins from South a’ the Border.

How ya doin’ Spanish Dude? :wink: