at least we know it is no bulls*it because it is patented by Elaine Fuchs who has made very important findings in the hair biology field. if she says it is worth looking into it then it is worth it.
I haven’t looked into the role of that protein but the original article states that in order to grow hair it must be expressed whereas in the patent it says that you need to downregulate it.
maybe we should find the connection between that protein and other known factors (wnt/ß-catenin for example) and then make a conclusion how dangerous that stuff it and find a way to modulate it. I am just saying …
unfortunately I don’t have the time to research it at the moment.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.