» » Fine, I talk about Axordia because its a “STEM CELL” company
» and maybe you
» » dont know it but ICX works with the same procedure: Stem
» cells. Stem cells
» » works with a lot of things, not only blindness. But I see youre blind
» » enough because the only excuse to say that ICX failed is because they
» dont
» » give information every week. “If ICX succeded they wouldnt need
» axordia”
» » They wouldnt eather need axordia if they failed. They wouldnt pay
» anything
» » in this case. Why did they buyed a new patent? You dont have arguments,
» » thats what I believe
»
» That highlighted line proves you have no idea what you are talking about.
Read…if you can: Intercytex Group plc (LSE: ICX) (“Intercytex”), the regenerative medicine company developing innovative products to restore skin and hair, announces today that it has acquired Axordia Limited (“Axordia”), a privately-held UK company focused on the development of stem cell therapies… Well, now read this: Dermal papilla cells
cells which are responsible for the formation of new hair and which are found at the basal region of the hair follicle. In the adult hair follicle, these cells play a crucial role in dermal-epidermal interactions that control hair production and hair cycling.
Naive newbies… ever so positive… and so boring… and wishing to believe in everything.
noone, please, believe the old timers of this board. We have seen this kind of situation many times before. TRC is a no-go. Most probably, ICX will sink altogether.
ICX stocks have fallen from 120 to 16. Today another 5%. There must be a reason, don’t you think?
» Naive newbies… ever so positive… and so boring… and wishing to
» believe in everything.
»
» noone, please, believe the old timers of this board. We have seen this
» kind of situation many times before. TRC is a no-go. Most probably, ICX
» will sink altogether.
» ICX stocks have fallen from 120 to 16. Today another 5%. There must be a
» reason, don’t you think?
Maybe Im a newbie in this forum, but Ive been participating in others for years. You have seen situations like this before, ok. But you all are talking if only ICX has problems…The bank ING are going to fire over 7000 employers, Philips never losed money. NEVER. And its going the first time they fire a lot of people too. Do you know why? BECAUSE THERE IS A CRISIS. You judge every simple think ant at the end say that ICX failed. Poor, realy poor. Give me arguments, STRONG and LOGICAL arguments. My godness…you are really stressing
» Maybe Im a newbie in this forum, but Ive been participating in others for
» years. You have seen situations like this before, ok. But you all are
» talking if only ICX has problems…The bank ING are going to fire over 7000
» employers, Philips never losed money. NEVER. And its going the first time
» they fire a lot of people too. Do you know why? BECAUSE THERE IS A CRISIS.
» You judge every simple think ant at the end say that ICX failed. Poor,
» realy poor. Give me arguments, STRONG and LOGICAL arguments. My
» godness…you are really stressing
Investors base decissions in strong and logical arguments. At least, much more logical than the ones in this forum.
Well, in the past years ICX has enjoyed years of easy credit, but regarding TRC, all we had were ultrareduced budget and cohorts (number of trialists). All the money was for ICX Pro, not TRC. ICX never allocated money for TRC. Even when money was plentiful. They knew that TRC had little possiblilites for success, but they were overly optimistic in the press. Manipulation and propaganda, looks to me.
Now that money is scarce, don’t expect any money for TRC at all.
And what about Vavelta? I am tired to ask. They say that it has already been launched, but not a single photo has been posted. Very significant.
If you want hope, look at ARI (DR. Washenik). It seems that Phase II will enroll 100 trialists. This has to be confirmed, of course. If true, this will be a real trial.
I was a big fan of ICX. I was even accused of having an agenda for them in this forum!!!. But now I can see the reality, and it is very ugly.
» » Maybe Im a newbie in this forum, but Ive been participating in others
» for
» » years. You have seen situations like this before, ok. But you all are
» » talking if only ICX has problems…The bank ING are going to fire over
» 7000
» » employers, Philips never losed money. NEVER. And its going the first
» time
» » they fire a lot of people too. Do you know why? BECAUSE THERE IS A
» CRISIS.
» » You judge every simple think ant at the end say that ICX failed. Poor,
» » realy poor. Give me arguments, STRONG and LOGICAL arguments. My
» » godness…you are really stressing
»
» Investors base decissions in strong and logical arguments. At least, much
» more logical than the ones in this forum.
»
» Well, in the past years ICX has enjoyed years of easy credit, but
» regarding TRC, all we had were ultrareduced budget and cohorts (number of
» trialists). All the money was for ICX Pro, not TRC. ICX never allocated
» money for TRC. Even when money was plentiful. They knew that TRC had little
» possiblilites for success, but they were overly optimistic in the press.
» Manipulation and propaganda, looks to me.
» Now that money is scarce, don’t expect any money for TRC at all.
»
» And what about Vavelta? I am tired to ask. They say that it has already
» been launched, but not a single photo has been posted. Very significant.
»
» If you want hope, look at ARI (DR. Washenik). It seems that Phase II will
» enroll 100 trialists. This has to be confirmed, of course. If true, this
» will be a real trial.
»
» I was a big fan of ICX. I was even accused of having an agenda for them in
» this forum!!!. But now I can see the reality, and it is very ugly.
Wow, “very good arguments” Investors wont “risk” their money because they dont know what will happening with ICX AND there is the crisis too. You think investors have more information about ICX, so you can say that its not going to work, but that isnt true. Lets wait for march and you will see how they talk about the beggining of the next an last trial.
The thing with the investors goes so: They dont read new information about this company because they have to wait a lot of time for the results of the trials. So they have the same problem like us: this big silence. But this isnt a good reason to say ICX will never launch, because this is too extremly. Investors only have financial information about the company. I repeat, there is a crisis and all companys have financial problems (one more than others of course).
» »
» Give me arguments, STRONG and LOGICAL arguments. My
» godness…you are really stressing
There are endless “STRONG and LOGICAL arguments” (no data, no photos, too small cohorts, gave up after Phase II, etc.), most of them made in this thread. You don’t want to hear them. You guys never want to hear them, and when you do, you argue against them.
Good luck my friend. May ICX bring you a full head of hair (in an alternate universe).
» Wow, “very good arguments” Investors wont “risk” their money because they
» dont know what will happening with ICX AND there is the crisis too. You
» think investors have more information about ICX, so you can say that its
» not going to work, but that isnt true. Lets wait for march and you will see
» how they talk about the beggining of the next an last trial.
»
» The thing with the investors goes so: They dont read new information about
» this company because they have to wait a lot of time for the results of the
» trials. So they have the same problem like us: this big silence. But this
» isnt a good reason to say ICX will never launch, because this is too
» extremly. Investors only have financial information about the company. I
» repeat, there is a crisis and all companys have financial problems (one
» more than others of course).
well, so investors are acting stupid?? very well, go on, boy, thats your chance! buy plenty of ICX stocks, now that they are undervalued!!
» » »
» » Give me arguments, STRONG and LOGICAL arguments. My
» » godness…you are really stressing
»
» There are endless “STRONG and LOGICAL arguments” (no data, no photos, too
» small cohorts, gave up after Phase II, etc.), most of them made in this
» thread. You don’t want to hear them. You guys never want to hear them,
» and when you do, you argue against them.
»
» Good luck my friend. May ICX bring you a full head of hair (in an
» alternate universe).
That arent good arguments. Sorry for wasting your time because since I read pessimistic opinions I didnt saw any variety:-D “No photos” Maybe you have read the coment of spanishdude (Valveta didnt show any photos) and the product launched. “No data” For a long time they said that they would give information in the firts months of 2009 and at the moment it seems to be so. You all are pessimistic because if you dont read any new about this company EVERY WEEK you begin to cry and tell your “perfect arguments” If the last thing they said was that everything is working fine…how do you interpret it? “Oh, they dont say too much…That maybe means that it isnt working right” You are ridiculous,really. “Gave up after phase II” Where did you hear that? Im sure that in this forum and that you believed it…Intercytex at the moment wont give up, that isnt an argument, that is a stupid theory.
» » Wow, “very good arguments” Investors wont “risk” their money because
» they
» » dont know what will happening with ICX AND there is the crisis too. You
» » think investors have more information about ICX, so you can say that
» its
» » not going to work, but that isnt true. Lets wait for march and you will
» see
» » how they talk about the beggining of the next an last trial.
» »
» » The thing with the investors goes so: They dont read new information
» about
» » this company because they have to wait a lot of time for the results of
» the
» » trials. So they have the same problem like us: this big silence. But
» this
» » isnt a good reason to say ICX will never launch, because this is too
» » extremly. Investors only have financial information about the company.
» I
» » repeat, there is a crisis and all companys have financial problems (one
» » more than others of course).
»
» well, so investors are acting stupid?? very well, go on, boy, thats your
» chance! buy plenty of ICX stocks, now that they are undervalued!!
Really funny, the paramount comedy is waiting for you. Investors arent stupid and I will tell you why: We talk about our hair, but investors about theyre money. I believe Intercytex is going to launch without any problem (dont try to discuss) but I wouldnt risk AT THIS MOMENT my money. I wouldnt invest money without being sure that Im going to get more money. That is the point. It doesnt matter if you think or not that this is going to success. Nobody knows and that is why I mean. You dont have to pay too much attention to the financial things. If you are investor and dont have the CERTANTY that you will get more money, how stupid are you to risk it? But this doesnt mean that Intercytex wont launch. It only means that people know the same thing like us: nothing (Not that ICX is going to fail)
I’m with you Noone, in a year and 5 months ( you must always remember that five is an esoteric number for the hairloss comunity, so it must appear anyway ) everybody (but maneless, of course) will have a full head of hair cause ICX will be a big success
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.
