It says the stem cells are put onto the scalp to resurrect “dead” follicles. This doesn’t sound like they’re growing new follicles in vitro (outside the body). It also says so far it’s only been tried in mice, which sounds disturbingly like many of the “discoveries” we’ve seen in the past.
Still, it seems that if anything is likely to be a real cure, this is it…
» http://theweek.com/article/index/210507/can-stem-cells-cure-baldness
»
» It says the stem cells are put onto the scalp to resurrect “dead”
» follicles. This doesn’t sound like they’re growing new follicles in vitro
» (outside the body). It also says so far it’s only been tried in mice,
» which sounds disturbingly like many of the “discoveries” we’ve seen in the
» past.
»
» Still, it seems that if anything is likely to be a real cure, this is
» it…
This is the wildest crap-rumors-misinterpreting media campaign I’ve never ever seen in this field.
I’m pretty sure that Prof. Lauster is surprised about what he is able – about something he didn’t even know he is able. lol
» http://theweek.com/article/index/210507/can-stem-cells-cure-baldness
»
» It says the stem cells are put onto the scalp to resurrect “dead”
» follicles. This doesn’t sound like they’re growing new follicles in vitro
» (outside the body). It also says so far it’s only been tried in mice,
» which sounds disturbingly like many of the “discoveries” we’ve seen in the
» past.
»
» Still, it seems that if anything is likely to be a real cure, this is
» it…
The information contained in theweek is quite wrong, but nothing that you should be surprised about, in fact if you follow two links from that page ( 1) ANI and 2)Fox and then bioscholar ) you can read : " Lauster claims the treatment - which would probably require the hair follicles to be implanted on to the head - could be available in five years ". The Nature link is from 2007 and talks about … Cotsarelis
» » http://theweek.com/article/index/210507/can-stem-cells-cure-baldness
» »
» » It says the stem cells are put onto the scalp to resurrect “dead”
» » follicles. This doesn’t sound like they’re growing new follicles in
» vitro
» » (outside the body). It also says so far it’s only been tried in mice,
» » which sounds disturbingly like many of the “discoveries” we’ve seen in
» the
» » past.
» »
» » Still, it seems that if anything is likely to be a real cure, this is
» » it…
»
» This is the wildest crap-rumors-misinterpreting media campaign I’ve
» never ever seen in this field.
»
» I’m pretty sure that Prof. Lauster is surprised about what he is able –
» about something he didn’t even know he is able. lol
Am I right in thinking…
they’ve already cloned human hair, and trials are to see how these hairs take to being implanted.
or
they’ve cloned animal hair and they want to see if they can do the same to human hair.
If it’s the first then this is worth getting very excited about in my opinion, if it’s the second, I won’t be giving it a second thought.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.