Home | News | Find a Doctor | Ask a Question | Free

Missleading photo\'s


#1

How many have noticed that the third photo is not the same as the other ones…??

You have the first two photos from the right side and then you have the third (recovering) photo from the left side. Why?

Check out the hairline on the first and second photo from the right to the left side and spot how up it goes. Then, If you try to assume the height you wont see the so called “improvement !!!” in the third photo.

Also try to do the vise versa.


#2

» How many have noticed that the third photo is not the same as the other
» ones…??
»
»


»
» You have the first two photos from the right side and then you have the
» third (recovering) photo from the left side. Why?
»
» Check out the hairline on the first and second photo from the right to the
» left side and spot how up it goes. Then, If you try to assume the height
» you wont see the so called “improvement !!!” in the third photo.
»
» Also try to do the vise versa.

EVERYONE has noticed that NO PHOTO of lawrence has EVER shown ANY improvement


#3

he turned his head to the other side, is that what you were talking about?


#4

If you think these photos are misleading you haven’t seen anything yet.

Take a look at gc 1961’s comb-over regrowth. Now THAT’S misleading.


#5

» If you think these photos are misleading you haven’t seen anything yet.
»
» Take a look at gc 1961’s comb-over regrowth. Now THAT’S misleading.

widows, if you want to take a look at some misleading combovers take a look at your own crown pics
now THAT qualifies for a combover instruction class…you are the master combover expert :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

widows charges 100 dollars to newbies for combover lessons If the below pics are not the biggest combover joke I have ever seen, I dont know what is

Here is the biggest combover west of the mississippi, or else a nice , well make that terrible, photoshop job
:clap:


some
of the thin spots in the crown? The crown is 90percent bald, with a huge combover


#6

» If you think these photos are misleading you haven’t seen anything yet.
»
» Take a look at gc 1961’s comb-over regrowth. Now THAT’S misleading.


#7

I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.

I don’t expect to see any regrowth either in the coming July photos.

Regrowth should be obvious. When you are losing hair it is obvious. People notice. You don’t have to show big pictures to prove you are losing your hair. When you are regrowing your hair it should be obvious. More when you claim than in 3-5 years all your hair will be back.


#8

» I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.
»
» I don’t expect to see any regrowth either in the coming July photos.
»
» Regrowth should be obvious. When you are losing hair it is obvious. People
» notice. You don’t have to show big pictures to prove you are losing your
» hair. When you are regrowing your hair it should be obvious. More when you
» claim than in 3-5 years all your hair will be back.

you mean you dont see any regrowth in Lawrence photos


#9

» I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.

gc 1961, a.k.a. “the comb-over king”, should be ashamed of himself.


#10

» » I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.
»
» gc 1961, a.k.a. “the comb-over king”, should be ashamed of himself.

nope, he should be proud of himself. Keep it going gc !:ok:


#11

» » I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.
»
» gc 1961, a.k.a. “the comb-over king”, should be ashamed of himself.

You have zero credibility; I offer you the chance to make $5k (and 10:1 odds) to defend your empty words and you run away like a chicken.


#12

» » » I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.
» »
» » gc 1961, a.k.a. “the comb-over king”, should be ashamed of himself.
»
» You have zero credibility; I offer you the chance to make $5k (and 10:1
» odds) to defend your empty words and you run away like a chicken.
»
»

pls dont ask chickenspeak to defend his hair, or verify anything, or tell us the date he is going on Oprah,he wets his pants

like When i challenged chickensWetHisPants, to tell me which GIB forum i am a member of so i can go post there,since i have recieved no confirmation email,he slinks away and says nothing

his normal procedure


#13

» » I can’t see any improvement at all in the Gc photos.
»
» gc 1961, a.k.a. “the comb-over king”, should be ashamed of himself.

Widowspeak, I saw GC’s photos and they definately show regrowth. How can you even think of calling GC the comb over king when you do it yourself.


#14

» » If you think these photos are misleading you haven’t seen anything yet.
» »
» » Take a look at gc 1961’s comb-over regrowth. Now THAT’S misleading.
»
» widows, if you want to take a look at some misleading combovers take a
» look at your own crown pics
» now THAT qualifies for a combover instruction class…you
» are the master combover expert :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:
»
» widows charges 100 dollars to newbies for combover lessons If the below
» pics are not the biggest combover joke I have ever seen, I dont know what
» is
»
»
» Here is the biggest combover west of the mississippi, or else a nice ,
» well make that terrible, photoshop job
» :clap:
»
»
» some
of the thin spots in the crown? The crown is 90percent bald,
» with a huge combover

Widowspeak, you have an obvious comb forward or combover in the the bigger photo as we can see how that crown area is all matted down and moved forward in an unnatural position for the hair.

In the smaller photo, I guess I don’t understand what all those black spots are on your crown area. Do you dye your hair? It looks like either hair dye or you are using black spray paint. It just doesn’t look normal to me maybe I am wrong. I don’t want to tick you off but I just want to get to the bottom of those mysterious black spots or patches in your right crown photo.


#15

Yes. I mean that I can’t see any difference between the photos of Lawrence.

For all I care they could’ve been taken the same minute.


#16

Because he is delusional and likes to play with big, black wrestler has-beens?