» » None of that was logic, and all of it was an ad hominem attack. Do you
» » know what that means? Its a type of fallacy by which, rather than
» » addressing a critique, the rebuttal focuses on the source of the
» » It is employed when one is unable to formulate a rebuttal.
» » I believe the OP requested a logical prediction. I’m still waiting for
» » yours.
» » As for you others, just provide me with one piece of scientific
» » (or even a hypothesis postulated by someone attached to Acell) that
» » suggests Acell will work on human hair. Not dog fur, not horse fur,
» » hair.
» Relax over there with your regurgitation of your first college level
» Logic,Reasoning, And Pursuasion class. Using big words that come straight
» from your class text makes you sound like a tool.
» How is anyone going to know if it works on humans if it doesnt get tested?
» Thats whats being done now on humans…no ridiculous back-door trials where
» ambigous results are ambiguously worded in power point presentations. Just
» hair transplant docs attempting to see if it helps in any way.
» Why are you so mad that this is going on? Noone on this site is claiming
» it works…we’re all hoping. Why are you hoping it fails?
Ouch. The whole bit about philo 101. Well done.
The only “mad” ones around here are the eternal optimists who have multiple threads about Acell’s inevitable success. “When will you get an Acell transplant”; “When I get my Acell hair”; etc., etc., etc. There’s no proof that Acell has any relevance, and yet its Gho/ICX all over again. One needs no proof that most of this board is once again crazed other than the immediate and vicious personal attacks that befall anyone who dare question the validity of some of these “theories”. You guys never learn. But do continue - its quite entertaining.
Here’s the hard facts:
- ICX is dead
- Follica will require at least 5-10 years of trials
- There is no proof Acell works on human hair
I know its hard to face, and I feel for you. I know its easy for me - a NW 2 - to bring a harsh but rational voice to these discussions. But its better that you maintain some reasonable level of skepticism than continually set yourselves up for disappointment. If this board is indeed for discussion about research, you people wouldn’t be foaming at the mouth screaming, “It works! I can feel it! Now lets prove it!”.
As an aside, why is it that, when someone begins employing vocabulary above the fifth grade level, people assume that its being copied verbatim from a thesaurus? Just because you struggle to put together a coherent sentence doesn’t mean we all do.