My Estimation for his crown is around 4000 HST Grafts and additional 2000 HST Grafts some years after that. All i can say is that his frontal area seems good and may only be need a small touch up.
What i like is, no scars, this is a blessing because if i would undergo a treatment i want to have the option for long hair as well as short hair.
Btw IronMan could it be that wanna do different approaches? Like in cutting out your scars, use a few of those then harvested grafts for a first frontal approach and use HST for the rest and to fill in your scars?
» Sneijder’s donor area wasn’t really the best BEFORE he heared about “Gho” -
» and it’s really interesting that someone can see a “hugely depleted donor
» area” where just 1700 were extracted. So I wonder how a donor area looks
» where they claim more than 7,000 FUE extractions “without any depletion”
» …
WESLEY SNEIJDER - November 9, 2009 (~13 month BEFORE his HST procedure)
I noticed that users in other hair loss boards can’t find THE PHOTOS – yesterday, actually I didn’t notice them either first after watching just the video on top of this Chinese website.
Anyway, a little bit BACKGROUND:
On Saturday, August 6, 2011, Wesley Sneijder had a football/soccer match in Beijing, China, according to the following article …
Sneijder reported also on Twitter about this event in China …
In my personal opinion, especially Sneijder’s REAL (occipital) donor area looks damn good in comparision to all other areas around the REAL donor area.
» » You can post the white dots FUE picture a hundred times more but its
» still
» » not a typical FUE result.
»
» Come back when you learn the difference between “traditional FUE procedure”
» and “typical FUE result” …
Incorrect, here it goes both ways because the procedure is the harvesting and implanting but the FUE result is well the end point in terms of donor appearance and recipient appearance so LarryDavid was correct in terms or to be more accurate, it doesnt matter which term you wanna use
procedure or result is just hogwash.
Fact is, not everyone (FUE doc) has white dots to that amount like the person in this white dot picture has.
So guys get away from your word hazzeling because this just doesnt help. I think those white dot results are common in FUE procedures or results but you cannot simply generalise this result here with all FUE procedures. We dont have the correct informations on the above patient, like did he use or was treated with a driller or just manual 1mm or bigger FUE Punches.
So this whole answer IronMan was only to attack one person, distract everyone etc.
» » You can post the white dots FUE picture a hundred times more but its
» still
» » not a typical FUE result.
»
» Come back when you learn the difference between “traditional FUE procedure”
» and “typical FUE result” …
you really are an ASS*HOLE! were your raised like a farm animal?
Its quite frustrating when people say oh this is just a typical 1500/2000 graft fue result, yes it is in the recipient area but if those grafts have regrown in the donor thats the main issue. on the recipient area itself it looks extremely good, for a really terrific result, some more dense packing would make a difference hugely for a dense look. Still as it is a huge improvement no doubt about that. Hopefully Scissorboy can put the question marks over donor regeneration too bed. I for one hope that this is done by confirming it works.
» Its quite frustrating when people say oh this is just a typical 1500/2000
» graft fue result, …
And THAT exactly is the problem:
One idiot (LarryDavid) simply hops in this thread, makes a sh’t comment completely out of context, and other users suddenly start to talk about “typical FUE result”.
Absolutely no one is talking here or claims “Sneijder’s result is a typical FUE result” - nobody!
I just posted and labeled the other photo above (above Sneijder’s photo) with “Donor area after traditional FUE procedure” - FOR COMPARISON ONLY!
And the other reason why I labeled the other photo above correctly, so that not another idiot suddenly claims "Look guys, I can clearly see white dots in Sneijders donor!!
What i have to say is, even other surgeons said that this WS result is pretty fine (good etc) but i bet according to SpanishDude and Co this surgeon is bought by Gho.
Anyway HST may resemble FUE but its a redefined Version with no or almost none white dots wahhh why am i keep repeating myself here.
Its simple, believe in HST or dont end of story. I personally do believe in this technique
» I just posted and labeled the other photo above (above Sneijder’s
» photo) with “Donor area after traditional FUE procedure”
» - FOR COMPARISON ONLY!
Just in case some guys (who are not so familiar with different HT techniques) still don’t understand …
By the way (OFF TOPIC) …
Hypopigmentation (loss of skin color/white dots) as you CLEARLY can see this in the photo above Sneijder’s photo (labeled “Donor area after traditional FUE procedure” ) does NOT always occur! - but unfortunately mostly. Interestingly especially almost not at all in African Americans (people with very dark skin color).
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.
