» I don’t see how Zohar’s comment automatically has to be taken to mean a
» literal injection with a needle. I come away thinking that word could just
» be a way to refer to the fact that they’re artificially adding chemicals to
» the mix. (Come to think of it, it could also even be a case of
» intentionally misleading.)
»
»
» Yeah, it certainly COULD mean a literal injection. But IMO that does not
» sound like a great way to go about this process. Sounds kind of
» hit-or-miss, and the systemic absorption would probably be an unknown
» factor to contend with. Topical would be better. And I think topical
» absorption of Gentifib-type drugs already has some history of working.
»
»
» I don’t imagine an ICX-style set of injections either. IMO that’s no way
» to get a consistent result at all. For all intents and purposes, I suspect
» that ICX-TRC’s best results may have been more or less manually hitting
» follicles with injections one at a time. (Yeah, I know they put out press
» to the contrary. But this is what I come away thinking from the whole
» project. It was pretty clear that THEY only had a vague idea of how their
» whole project was working for that matter.)
» » actually loniten (oral minoxidil) was for blood pressure originally and
» it
» » had no relation to hair growth.
»
» Unwanted hair growth on the face & body was a side effect for 8 out of
» 10 people that took the orals.
»
» Minoxidil is mentioned very prominently in
» » the follica patent and was used in a experimental example as an
» adjuvant. I
» » can almost guarantee you that they will use minox along with an
» » egf-antagonist and an anti-androgen-----------which was the simpleist
» » embodiment of the patent. The anti-androgen, finasteride, was a
» prostate
» » medication before it was a hair medication just like minox, therefore
» Zohar
» » can claim these things aren’t for hairgrowth–but they are.
»
» So based on this rational,when she claims that drugs will be injected
» into the scalp she is infact inferring that it will be a topical? Yeah OK,I
» guess our “interpretations” of what we read differ.I for one won’t be
» disappointed when this “kit“ isn’t released in a few months.
Is anyone here from Colorado
» I don’t see how Zohar’s comment automatically has to be taken to mean a
» literal injection with a needle. I come away thinking that word could just
» be a way to refer to the fact that they’re artificially adding chemicals to
» the mix. (Come to think of it, it could also even be a case of
» intentionally misleading.)
»
»
» Yeah, it certainly COULD mean a literal injection. But IMO that does not
» sound like a great way to go about this process. Sounds kind of
» hit-or-miss, and the systemic absorption would probably be an unknown
» factor to contend with. Topical would be better. And I think topical
» absorption of Gentifib-type drugs already has some history of working.
»
»
» I don’t imagine an ICX-style set of injections either. IMO that’s no way
» to get a consistent result at all. For all intents and purposes, I suspect
» that ICX-TRC’s best results may have been more or less manually hitting
» follicles with injections one at a time. (Yeah, I know they put out press
» to the contrary. But this is what I come away thinking from the whole
» project. It was pretty clear that THEY only had a vague idea of how their
» whole project was working for that matter.)
I agree with you, It is my belief that when she said inject the drugs she meant using the drugs during the small window of time that they have to create either skin or follicles, And as far as we know the follicles will form like on a child so it will more than likely be a topical application.
I really don’t give a sh*t what they do as long as I can get rid of this hideous scar tissue.I am not saying that I am right & you guys are wrong. There is already 1 too many flame wars on this board.
I just don’t know how anyone can take this article seriously.The writer is claiming that a kit will be offered in months. This is just flat out stupid as we know for fact that Follica are still assessing & trying to understand this products feasibility/commercial viability. (Proof of Concept)
» CALVÍCIE: REVOLUCIONÁRIO TRATAMENTO É DESCOBERTO PARA CALVICE
the title of that website is “hypescience” and i have another good name for it, “bullsh*tscience” or even “made-up science”.
baldlatino, you are just taking spanish and portuguese articles and making your own speculations about follica. these articles are just rehashing and re-reporting stuff that has already been reported in english. and these articles give us no more information than anything provided in english.
in fact this article goes a bit farther and actually seems to be making shyte up. nowhere did i ever see or hear cotsarelis or daphne zohar say anything about a “kit” becoming available, or that one would be sold.
it’s interesting that we first hear about a “kit” from some unknown brazilian “science” website in portuguese!!
i wonder where the writer of that article got his/her information from!
my guess is not from anyone connected with follica!
they can’t just come out with a kit in months without doing the necessary research and having the procedure approved in some form. that will take a lot longer than just a few months.
it looks like that article contains stuff that was just made up out of whole cloth, i.e. complete speculation and wishful thinking from the author who wrote the piece. the article isn’t even attributed to anyone and there are no direct quotes about a “kit” from anyone at follica.
it seems like the person who wrote that article has been reading hairsite and then inventing his own speculation as to what MIGHT happen…
ACCURATELY THIS THAT I AM ASKING HERE, IF SOMEBODY KNOWS SOME INFORMATION, BECAUSE I ALSO DO NOT BELIEVE.
» ACCURATELY THIS THAT I AM ASKING HERE, IF SOMEBODY KNOWS SOME INFORMATION,
» BECAUSE I ALSO DO NOT BELIEVE.
ok case closed, the answer is no, there wont be any follica treatment for sale any time soon.
Agreed.
This sounds like the existing information, just interpreted & repeated by a fresh source.