Interesting time projection by Aderans

» » Phase#1 basically tells us that it won’t kill anyone, phase#2 tells us
» » whether it’s actually gonna work, and phase#3 is fine-tuning.
»
» Actually, they study efficacy of a drug/treatment in phase-2 - which could
» also include trying different formulations/methods.
»
» In phase-III, they move ahead with the finalized formulation/method on a
» large number of people to demonstrate safety & efficacy. As far as I know,
» they don’t fine-tune the treatment in phase-III, because this is the
» finalized treatment/formulation as it would be marketed to the people.
»
» So in short, if Aderans move to(announce) phase-III then you can bet
» your a** that the treatment is coming to the market within 2-3 years or
» sooner.

not rly, failure ratio in phase III is pretty high.

» not rly, failure ratio in phase III is pretty high.

really?
Can you explain better us this affirmation?

is some result available?

» » not rly, failure ratio in phase III is pretty high.
»
»
» really?
» Can you explain better us this affirmation?
»
» is some result available?

Also debris please tell us what is your success ratio for head crushings and vagina cream that you promote for hairloss problem? Is it better than these scientists?

» not rly, failure ratio in phase III is pretty high.

What’s a failure???

If you define failure as Aderans treatment growing no hair at all, then it’s impossible that it will fail phase-III. If your idea of failure is anything that doesn’t give you a teenage hairline - then you are probably right, Aderans will fail.

I read somewhere that % of failure is
phase 1 - 10%
phase 2 - 70%
phase 3 - 10%

» I read somewhere that % of failure is
» phase 1 - 10%
» phase 2 - 70%
» phase 3 - 10%

Give or take 10% :smiley:

» Its pretty old.

The year at the bottom is not the last time the information on the page was updated. There is no real correlation between the two. The information (or statement in this case) could be older then 2007, from 2007, or after 2007.

Look at the news page. Articles from 2009 on a page that is dated 2008. One extra click proves you wrong.

You really need to lay off the female hormones, every time you post you keep sounding more and more like a little b*tch.