There has been no breakthrough or new technologies for the past 10 years. You can talk all you want but it means nothing until you show me a revolutionary product that is practical and is now available on the market.
People always get misled into believing that some companies are offering a new breakthrough in non-surgical hair replacement just beacuse they are using a fancy name or terminology.
You can’t possibly called SNAPS and SUTURE new technologies. SNAP-ON hairpiece are basically clips, and they have been around for decades. SUTURE is banned in the US. It was practised by a company in New Jersey about 10 years ago. If you still want to do sutures, you will have to go to Europe at the risk of getting infection.
The most natural and undetectable attachment method is still by means of adhesives and that has not changed.
Two possible exceptions:
-
“Interlink” where they loop hair knots to your existing hair to add density. It does not require glue or adhesives, but the maintenance is beyond this world. You lose the knots each time your existing hair falls out. It takes half a day to add just a small amount of hair, hardly a cost effective option at all. All the teasing to your existing hair may cause traction alopecia too.
-
New technique from Japan where they “inject” individual hairs into a ultra thin mold that is probably just 1/10 or a cm thick. Still, I wouldn’t call this a breakthrough because this is just a variation of Versacchi’s Cosmetic Transdermal Reconstruction that was popular back in the 90s before everybody started turning to lace.