why did such a high percentage of the study participants drop out? this question is rarely addressed
you assume they were getting free injections and possibly even getting paid to participate in the study
so why did they drop out? this to me is an extremely important question that has not been answered, since this is or was a company on the edge of breaking science in the hair loss field and a large percent of the study participants just up and quit.
I would guess that this incident is rare also, which makes it even more compelling to find the reason for the mass exodus.
» why carry on with research until the end of phase II, y not quit now and
» throw everything in the bin?
»
» y do commercial work if there is nothing commercialise at the end of phase
» II ?
»
» If the results are crap then why are they patenting their findings ?
»
»
» these are the real questions that no one has addressed
those are valid points also
however the question of why the participants quit is compelling.
the first assumption would be, they were getting no results, and got tired of having needles stuck in their head over and over and over again
you would think that even if they were getting marginal results ANY PROGRESS at all, they would continue with the study, and be willing to continue showing up for the treatments, since they probably agreed IN WRITING to do this in order to be selected as a participant.
» could it be perhaps that the board owner or one of the many docs who
» reside on the board…some of whom presumably could well
» afford the investment…dumped their shares
»
» just a thought
If I had to guess, I would say the trades were made by forum readers that have lost faith in ICX. However, there are probably a few hundred regular lurkers out there who follow the board, but never post a word. There are simply way too many possible investors out there to even guess at which specific ones might have sold off their shares.
»
» remember how we were chided for speculating on ICX
»
» the reason for this, is still unknown
With a few minor exceptions, I think Hairsite has been pretty fair about edits/deletes in the past, but I did sense an unusual bias this time around. In light of Hairsite’s recent post addressed to me (about perpetuating falsehoods and b.s.), I don’t understand why morons like the “celebrity-hair-secret” prick (see below) haven’t been banned or at least have their posts immediately deleted.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.