» think whatever you want about Alan Spievak death. You may think, if you
» want, that it was Cook Biotech, that poisoned him, or the aliens that sent
» “death waves” to cause his cancer.
» But the truth is that he claimed that the pixie dust could cure bladder
» cancer, and he died precisely of bladder cancer. And his brother Lee says
» that no doctor wanted to treat him with his own technology. Oooohhh, sorry
» but I don’t believe these tales for children. Iron_Man, how old are you?
» 
» They are playing the victims, and in the meantime they are lying like
» crazy (eg, finger story).
»
» Tell me where the US Pentagon believes in Acell. Specifically in Acell.
» And don’t tell me that they are investing in regenerative medicine, matrix
» technology, etc. I want you to tell me if they are investing in Acell
» specifically. Because I have just made a google search for AFIRM+Acell, and
» I have got no pertinent results.
»
»
»
» » Thank’s Spanish Dude for clarifying some things.
» » -----------
» » » He stated that they have been in court battling over patent
» » infringements » over the past four years which has halted their
» » progress but they have » won the legal issues are are moving forward.
» » »
» »
» http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/board_entry-id-2810-page-0-order-last_answer-category-0.html
» »
» » -----------
» » That means between 2003 and 2007, ACell has been unable to progress
» with
» » their products. That could maybe one reason why Alan Spievack (founder)
» » died in 2008 – who knows. That would ironically mean that he won the
» legal
» » issue in court, but actually Cook Biotech won the battle 2 years later
» » outside the court, because Alan Spievack has been unable to progress
» with
» » the cure for his personally battle …
» »
» » » Also, at that time, I was sold the idea that Acell was a more
» » » sophisticated version of Cook Biotech products.
» »
» » Ah, that could be the reason why the US Pentagon still believe in
» ACell’s
» » pixie dust …
Here’s the deal with Acell
Someone posted something about Acell.
I looked at the links and became interested in this product. I thought it had the POTENTIAL to regenerate removed donor tissue and hair (because I saw the vet. pics which did so)
I called the company and ran this idea by them. They said that people had brought this up before (but focused on regenerating the hair in the recipient area). They stated that they didn’t know “how deep” to go (because of the hormones affecting this region) so they didn’t think that it would help with hair loss. When I stated that I thought it would be better to regenerate removed donor tissue (and hair) they said “that just might work”. Over several conversations with them (on the phone) they seemed to be fairly confident that it would regenerate removed donor tissue and hair.
I then posted about this here because I thought it might be of some interest to some of the members. I put together a letter to send to the HT docs and compiled a list of e-mail addresses (with the help of some forum members).
I sent the letter to about 60 docs and a few showed interest. One in particular (doc j) used the product and was transparent with his results. His procedure failed, but I personally believe he made some mistakes due to the fact that it scabbed up (and it is not supposed to).
I believed it must not work due to the fact that I didn’t hear anything about it and if it worked…we would have heard something.
I didn’t hear anything about it until it was recently posted on this site that some other docs are using it.
I have no idea if it works or not. Personally, I’ve lost faith in it also. I think that the docs must know if it works by now and since we’ve heard nothing confirming that …it’s not a good sign.
Reguardless, since we will probably have 10 years or so until HM (at least that’s what most of you are saying), I’m still interested in reading (and posting) about it.
Some say I was paid promote Acell…I wish that were true. I did it because I believed it had a chance of regenerating donor tissue and hair and I just want my f&%#ing hair back! Believe whatever you want, and I don’t have the time or motivation to back and forth about this.
As far as Iron Man goes…I really have no idea what his deal is. He’s very hard to understand. I can’t tell if he supports Acell or is against it. Nor do I care. I personally believe he is here for attention (that’s pathetic) and probably posted under some other name before…and maybe still does.
Anyways, I’m still glad some docs are using it. I’m curious to see what (if any results ) they get. It costs me nothing to follow it (and as far as I know, it doesn’t cost anyone here anything to follow (or not follow it)).
You really can stretch things up and I never know is it a stretch of your imagination or VERY elastic analogies and arguments. Look man, many clouds in the sky look like castles but try to get an investor to give you mortgage on one.The pursuit to get someone to invest in an idea does not consist in ignoring facts.