I am waiting for Histogen\'s final results

» Regenica
» Saturday 25 12:23 pm

Sorry, I forgot to add the link to the ISHRS Meeting, but I’m seeing that you found it. Like riccardo123 said, it will be the 25th July (Saturday), page 10.

thanks ymail.
it seems that the schedule in the pdf document is not in text format, but in graphic format, and that is why the string “Regenica” cannot be searched.

The timeslot for Regenica is 7 minutes long. Same as Dr. Gho. :expressionless:

» » Regenica
» » Saturday 25 12:23 pm
»
» Sorry, I forgot to add the link to the ISHRS Meeting, but I’m seeing that
» you found it. Like riccardo123 said, it will be the 25th July (Saturday),
» page 10.

is the ISHRS
supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?

as far as I know the only qualifications to join are pay the annual fee, and call yourself a hair transplant doc

there are no medical standards or board exams for hair transplant docs

any MD can call himself a hair transplant surgeon after taking a weekend course

so why is the ISHRS meeting so special?
I guess they invite all the reps for the companies who are currently researching HM to speak?

» is the ISHRS
» supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?

How come when someone points a respected researcher’s work regarding hair loss you blast as speculation, yet you use the term respected researcher, to paraphrase, to blast something else. You are such a hypocritical moron.

I guess there findings would be more relevant if they were discussing a super hair vitamin.

» thanks ymail.
» it seems that the schedule in the pdf document is not in text format, but
» in graphic format, and that is why the string “Regenica” cannot be
» searched.
»
» The timeslot for Regenica is 7 minutes long. Same as Dr. Gho. :expressionless:
»
» » » Regenica
» » » Saturday 25 12:23 pm
» »
» » Sorry, I forgot to add the link to the ISHRS Meeting, but I’m seeing
» that
» » you found it. Like riccardo123 said, it will be the 25th July
» (Saturday),
» » page 10.

I hope you don’t sit in front of the computer all day Saturday waiting for something to be published. I suggest go play a round of golf. You can wear a hat golfing!

» is the ISHRS
» supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?
»
» as far as I know the only qualifications to join are pay the annual fee,
» and call yourself a hair transplant doc
»
» there are no medical standards or board exams for hair transplant docs
»
» any MD can call himself a hair transplant surgeon after taking a weekend
» course
»
» so why is the ISHRS meeting so special?
» I guess they invite all the reps for the companies who are currently
» researching HM to speak?

That’s a whole new topic and I don’t want to hijack this thread. But since you brought it up, personally, I think the ISHRS is more of a marketing ploy than anything else.

» » is the ISHRS
» » supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?
»
»
» How come when someone points a respected researcher’s work regarding hair
» loss you blast as speculation, yet you use the term respected researcher,
» to paraphrase, to blast something else. You are such a hypocritical moron.
»
»
» I guess there findings would be more relevant if they were discussing a
» super hair vitamin.

I merely pointed out that the members of ISHRS are not necessarily researchers
apparently that offends you

» » » is the ISHRS
» » » supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?
» »
» »
» » How come when someone points a respected researcher’s work regarding
» hair
» » loss you blast as speculation, yet you use the term respected
» researcher,
» » to paraphrase, to blast something else. You are such a hypocritical
» moron.
» »
» »
» » I guess there findings would be more relevant if they were discussing a
» » super hair vitamin.
»
» I merely pointed out that the members of ISHRS are not necessarily
» researchers
» apparently that offends you

I am merely pointing out that you will post something just to post it and you have no consistency in your posts, besides a super hair vitamin. And this is a good example of what a hypocrite you are and hopefully people will ignore you in the future.

Its funny how you tried to turn this around on me. I wont take the bait because I honestly think your kind of tool. I am just tired of seeing you hijack threads all these threads.

» is the ISHRS
» supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?
»
» as far as I know the only qualifications to join are pay the annual fee,
» and call yourself a hair transplant doc
»
» there are no medical standards or board exams for hair transplant docs
»
» any MD can call himself a hair transplant surgeon after taking a weekend
» course
»
» so why is the ISHRS meeting so special?
» I guess they invite all the reps for the companies who are currently
» researching HM to speak?

Finally something I agree with hangin on. ISHRS is a basically a commercial organization, in which doctors join to lend legitamacy to their practice. I read a post on Rassman’s blog in regards to why he is no longer a member. Basically, he no longer need their promotional help for his buisness.

Basically I am saying this

the ISHRS is not a respected organization in the medical community
it is a paid membership organization basically used as an advertising tool by doctors who are hair transplant docs. This membership sounds great and it looks great on their brochures and advertising.

Membership of an organization like this APPEARS AS THOUGH it is a stamp of approval by the medical community to this particular surgeons skills. It is not.
The only requirments for membership are pay the yearly dues and be a hair trans doc.

That is why I am saying you guys keep listing this organization meeting AS COMING UP THIS MONTH as if that is relevant and that means something. I am saying, this organization is irrelevant in the medical community, and it is not a SOCIETY of anything.

So stop deluding yourselves as if their meeting has any significance.

The ISHRS is an advertising front organization. It is used by new docs trying to establish a clientele, to make themselves appear more credible. Few established surgeons with a big following, are members (though I could be wrong on this, have not checked each of the big docs websites) I know Dr A is not a member and he said he didnt think they had any credibility.

» » is the ISHRS
» » supposed to be some respected group of hair loss researchers?
» »
» » as far as I know the only qualifications to join are pay the annual
» fee,
» » and call yourself a hair transplant doc
» »
» » there are no medical standards or board exams for hair transplant docs
» »
» » any MD can call himself a hair transplant surgeon after taking a
» weekend
» » course
» »
» » so why is the ISHRS meeting so special?
» » I guess they invite all the reps for the companies who are currently
» » researching HM to speak?
»
» Finally something I agree with hangin on. ISHRS is a basically a
» commercial organization, in which doctors join to lend legitamacy to their
» practice. I read a post on Rassman’s blog in regards to why he is no longer
» a member. Basically, he no longer need their promotional help for his
» buisness.

exactly its a paid member organization that LOOKS GOOD TO LIST ON YOUR WEBSITE AND BROCHURES

MEMBER OF The International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
damn sounds like this is a good doctor,
Sounds like a stamp of approval to most guys

Jesus Christ, stop harping on hangin, he’s right.

It’s great we are finally going to see how results went with Histogen regarding the human trial though. That’s what this meeting is good for.

But I wouldn’t simply cast the presentations aside. Would you go see your favorite band at a sketchy festival? I would.

Good point Milleu, also there are some good doctors in ISHRS too, Hasson and Wong has very good reputation and they are part of the ISHRS

» Jesus Christ, stop harping on hangin, he’s right.
»
» It’s great we are finally going to see how results went with Histogen
» regarding the human trial though. That’s what this meeting is good for.
»
» But I wouldn’t simply cast the presentations aside. Would you go see your
» favorite band at a sketchy festival? I would.

» Good point Milleu, also there are some good doctors in ISHRS too, Hasson
» and Wong has very good reputation and they are part of the ISHRS
»
» » Jesus Christ, stop harping on hangin, he’s right.
» »
» » It’s great we are finally going to see how results went with Histogen
» » regarding the human trial though. That’s what this meeting is good for.
»
» »
» » But I wouldn’t simply cast the presentations aside. Would you go see
» your
» » favorite band at a sketchy festival? I would.

Yes Hasson and Wong are the best fuss surgeons in the world, but being part of the ISHRS don’t mean sh*t :stuck_out_tongue:

»
» I hope you don’t sit in front of the computer all day Saturday waiting for
» something to be published. I suggest go play a round of golf. You can
» wear a hat golfing!

Sadly, I bet one or two posters will actually sit there, hitting refresh every few minutes.

will there be also dt Greco???

Is there anyone who can tell us what was showed there?
Or anyone who can email Histogen’s CEO, Dr. Gail Naughton to ask?

» Just a reminder:
» Histogen said they would present final results of the hair regeneration
» trial on first half of 2009…

» will there be also dt Greco???

Yes, Greco is supposed to talk about his platelet rich plasma treatment, I think he owes it to the ISHRS because they gave him a grant to do the research,

» Is there anyone who can tell us what was showed there?
» Or anyone who can email Histogen’s CEO, Dr. Gail Naughton to ask?
»
» » Just a reminder:
» » Histogen said they would present final results of the hair regeneration
» » trial on first half of 2009…
ughhh. take a breather dude; they’ll post info eventually. Histogen is strapped for cash (unlike Follica); it’s in their best interest to build hype for this product.

Secondly, you’re a big boy; you don’t need us to hold your hand; you can email histogen yourself. I emailed them several months ago; they’re responsive to inquiries.

I feel they have nothing big to post. otherwise they would have updated their website by now. I hope I am wrong.
anyway, give me Naughton’s email. I think it was posted here previously.

take a breather? it is funny. a forum that is full of idiotic posts, and now that there is something worthy to watch, people seem unresponsive/apathic.

» » Is there anyone who can tell us what was showed there?
» » Or anyone who can email Histogen’s CEO, Dr. Gail Naughton to ask?
» »
» » » Just a reminder:
» » » Histogen said they would present final results of the hair
» regeneration
» » » trial on first half of 2009…
» ughhh. take a breather dude; they’ll post info eventually. Histogen is
» strapped for cash (unlike Follica); it’s in their best interest to build
» hype for this product.
»
» Secondly, you’re a big boy; you don’t need us to hold your hand; you can
» email histogen yourself. I emailed them several months ago; they’re
» responsive to inquiries.