Hey biston, ok lets assume your situation with 40% and repeating procedure. Then you would be right. And also if we consider Iron Mans opinions.
The worst worst worst case with the current informations is that Histogen can just save us some Grafts on a normal ht.
WHat we can see on those, yeah i give you that , bad pictures is a transformation from lets say a NW7 to a diffuse NW4 IF IF IF IF IF we sum things on a full scale and not just a part of your head.
Try it for yourself take the regrown hair and put it on the rest of the head and take a NW7 as the basic person. You will end up with a diffuse NW4
Yes right now its far from marketing, but only for NW6 and up. If you are a diffuse NW 5 something this would transform you at least to a NW3 with some diffuse patterns.
Those results are nothing to jump in the air and kick some rocks but they are good to see that there is HOPE for us within a reasonable period of time.
And we have to know that Histogen actually has some financial issues, thats a fact and they dont make a secret about it. Which is actually a good thing, cause i think they will become really really succesful with their HM because they went the truth way and give away some infos.
So to answer your questions in a serious and honest way.
Yes you can get your full head of hair back BUT it depends on your NW status, a NW 1 to NW 3 will most likely only need one procedure done whereas up to a NW5 i think its high likely that we will need 2 treatments. The first for getting things started and the second to boost the first treatment.
But i actually DONT know about scar tissue, i asked my friedn who is into biological stuff about the chance that with rejuvenanton/etc hair can grow on scar tissue.
He only replied that there can and will be growth but it wont be significant. He told me this just today.
He also told me that Histogens thing will have some more or less positive effects on your donor. It will make your donor thinning obsolet and therefore there will be some problems, because when you start this treatment you will most likely look like a clown cause your donor will be huge and on top of your head there will be slower regrow.
Is Histogens method a one stop solution? NO its not, at least not for NW6 and up
Do we need some HT? YES we will, cause the frontal area will be a very risky thing. Just ask Iron Man he knows a lot of stuff about those small white hairs. I only know the theorie about it but he knows all the other things
Is the product they have right now good or marketable? YES and NO YES for some minor NW scale people this could be an easy fillup and No for the rest and the people who had for example a strip procedure done.
ARI or Histogen WHO will make it? I dont know cause we dont know exactly what they are really up to in their idea to market their procedure.
Is the 40% increase good? YES it is cause it will save as i said before a lot of grafts for a ht.
Will i ever have back my hairs like hen i was 18? YES you will but it will look stupid i can guarantee this.
DO You have some concerns? Yes i have some concerns about getting addicted to Histogens or Aris treatments, cause i think people will go nuts if they can get back their hair they will start to do those treatements all the time even if the got back their yourthful hair.
Cause even if HT is a bloody mess, people still go for more and more Strip FUTs which i cannot understand actually but thats another story.
So thanks biston for your jonest interest, i hope i could help you at least just a little bit.
» » Leonard is actually pretty close with his opinions.
» »
» » WHat i can say is, that the result is pretty good for a pre clinical
» test
» » phase. I like it and even if it wont give full density (what i didnt
» think)
» » it can and will absolutely improve HT procedures.
» »
» » » Stop talking about spanish dude, we don’t care about that… we need
» to
» » » understand better the poor info we have on histogen/aderans, I guess
» we
» » can
» » » discover “stealth” information with constructive posts and
» » observations!
» » »
» » » However I hope leonard is right ! I like your interpretation leonard.
»
» As I said in precedent posts, my biggest fear is that they GOT something
» that works but not enough to be marketable
»
» I mean, if they achieve the goal of improve by 40% in hair count (DHT
» resistant hair obviously) they’ll SELL or not? I would pay for that (a
» reasonable price) simply because personally minox to me was a total fail,
» and a way to have back some hair dht resistant with a procedure I guess
» repeteable should be FINE, much better than nothing… in combination with
» an hair transplant and 1 or 2 procedure should be cool I think, don’t you?