High dose results are worse than low dose

» » http://www.vavelta.com/vavelta/mp/story/vaveltaface/cell02.pdf
» »
" we have a legitimate reason to be overly
» optimistic, we still don’t have enough info
." ======No Kidding, because they chose to not provide hardly ANY info.

It would have been soooooooooooooooooooooooo haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaard to put just one picture of a guys before-and-after picture up wouldn’t it?

Like Ive said…they probably turned areas with 30 hairs per square inch into areas with 40-60 hairs per square inch, and areas with 10 hairs per square inch into areas with 20 hairs per square inch. Unfortunately for decent thickness you need 150-200 hairs per square inch…and they found out that MORE SHOTS yielded less hairs.

The only way the could go to market with that would be that it would be something that youd’ get, and a year later get again in hopes that you grew a little more each time. But what if it didn’t?

All we can do is speculate because they wont say a dammed word, they wont answer emails, they didnt release any real hair counts, they didnt even release percentages and they werent willing to paste not one before and after picture. HT surgeons paste before and afters all over the place. Its been YEARS now, YEARS. Three years from phase one to phase two, and its been another what…2 years since and this is all they are willing to show?

I wouldn’t invest a dime in them now, sorry.