I am a Chinese, and English is not good, I use my translation software writing, I listen to a Chinese doctor, said Northwestern University School of Medicine in hair multiplication technology has been successful, a hair follicle can be divided into 5 hair follicles can complete hair loss treatment, which is really Of it?
» I am a Chinese, and English is not good, I use my translation software
» writing, I listen to a Chinese doctor, said Northwestern University School
» of Medicine in hair multiplication technology has been successful, a hair
» follicle can be divided into 5 hair follicles can complete hair loss
» treatment, which is really Of it?
Tell us the name of this doctor, so we can search some infos online!
» I am a Chinese, and English is not good, I use my translation software
» writing, I listen to a Chinese doctor, said Northwestern University School
» of Medicine in hair multiplication technology has been successful, a hair
» follicle can be divided into 5 hair follicles can complete hair loss
» treatment, which is really Of it?
nice fairy tale
» » I am a Chinese, and English is not good, I use my translation software
» » writing, I listen to a Chinese doctor, said Northwestern University
» School
» » of Medicine in hair multiplication technology has been successful, a
» hair
» » follicle can be divided into 5 hair follicles can complete hair loss
» » treatment, which is really Of it?
»
» nice fairy tale
The name of the doc is…HairiHairihairchinia:-D
His name is chenlunan, his mentor is moriths, he said that his school in ohio, is located in north-central United States, the school was well-known in the United States at Northwestern University School of Medicine in a branch, called WESTEN, schools in the United States compared with the medical profession A word-of-mouth. The United States the best surgeon in the hospital on the campus, in the treatment of hair loss is more authoritative. He said the school has studied the success of the hair follicle and multiplication finasteride C2B (more good results than finasteride), in 2010 sales can be. We are here to debate, that he is not a liar. I hope this is not the case.
» I am a Chinese, and English is not good, I use my translation software
» writing, I listen to a Chinese doctor, said Northwestern University School
» of Medicine in hair multiplication technology has been successful, a hair
» follicle can be divided into 5 hair follicles can complete hair loss
» treatment, which is really Of it?
You sir, are a troll. I understand your english is not that great so if your unfamiliar with the term google it then use the google translator.
» His name is chenlunan, his mentor is moriths, he said that his school in
» ohio, is located in north-central United States, the school was well-known
» in the United States at Northwestern University School of Medicine in a
» branch, called WESTEN, schools in the United States compared with the
» medical profession A word-of-mouth. The United States the best surgeon in
» the hospital on the campus, in the treatment of hair loss is more
» authoritative. He said the school has studied the success of the hair
» follicle and multiplication finasteride C2B (more good results than
» finasteride), in 2010 sales can be. We are here to debate, that he is not a
» liar. I hope this is not the case.
I have never heard of multiplication finasteride C2B. it sounds like a bs to me.
if he really said multiplication finasteride C2B then he is most probably bragging liar imho.
I am puzzled, he said that the FDA has not got the production rights, in any case, next year we can see the results because he said that China will be back to do the 10-experiment. Multiplication on the hair follicle. I hope that the 3 years will be hair loss Treatment, because now I will now proceed to the deterioration of the forehead. Finasteride for the forehead is largely ineffective. Is very distressing.
Today, I received a reply at Northwestern University, who only responded to what I said: Hello, We do not offer that here. I do not have any recommendations as well to let you know who does. Thank you for your question I do not quite understand They did not give me any recommendations, because they are not doing the research to be confidential? Or they do not have to do this research? Hope that the former one.
» I am puzzled, he said that the FDA has not got the production rights, in
» any case, next year we can see the results because he said that China will
» be back to do the 10-experiment. Multiplication on the hair follicle. I
» hope that the 3 years will be hair loss Treatment, because now I will now
» proceed to the deterioration of the forehead. Finasteride for the forehead
» is largely ineffective. Is very distressing.
I dont know how in china, but in the western world it does not work like this. Trials and approval and research take a decade at least. not 3 years.
» Today, I received a reply at Northwestern University, who only responded to
» what I said: Hello, We do not offer that here. I do not have any
» recommendations as well to let you know who does. Thank you for your
» question I do not quite understand They did not give me any
» recommendations, because they are not doing the research to be
» confidential? Or they do not have to do this research? Hope that the former
» one.
Do not try to find some conspiracy where there is none. They said they don’t know anything about it, because well, they probably rly do not do any hair multiplication at all. Your guy is a liar.
… The other person is really depressed, modern science and technology so advanced, why not even a hair loss treatment are not good?
» … The other person is really depressed, modern science and technology so
» advanced, why not even a hair loss treatment are not good?
modern science advanced ? LOL … if you’ve got any serious disease you are f*cked up !
» » proceed to the deterioration of the forehead. Finasteride for the
» forehead
» » is largely ineffective. Is very distressing.
Finasteride is more effective on the back. It is less effective on the front. But regardless of where you are losing your hair, it is worth a try. What you should hope for is to keep the amount of hair you have.
» » … The other person is really depressed, modern science and technology
» so
» » advanced, why not even a hair loss treatment are not good?
»
» modern science advanced ? LOL … if you’ve got any serious disease you
» are f*cked up !
This is the most agnorant post i have ever seen.
Serious diseases are the ones that are not cured yet.
I can name you hundreds of COMMON and DEADLY diseases that you cant kill you thanks to modern science.
If it wasnt for modern science my whole family should be dead by now.
Why do some people choose to see only the negative side?
» » » … The other person is really depressed, modern science and technology
» » so
» » » advanced, why not even a hair loss treatment are not good?
» »
» » modern science advanced ? LOL … if you’ve got any serious disease
» you
» » are f*cked up !
»
» This is the most agnorant post i have ever seen.
»
» Serious diseases are the ones that are not cured yet.
LOL, you don’t know what you’re talking about, you must be an agnorant too.
» I can name you hundreds of COMMON and DEADLY diseases that you cant kill
» you thanks to modern science.
»
» If it wasnt for modern science my whole family should be dead by now.
»
» Why do some people choose to see only the negative side?
Your tone is inadequate, I didn’t gave you that confidence, if that can be said like that, I don’t know; and I will tell you another thing that I don’t know whether it can be said : “Suck me an egg!”
» » » » … The other person is really depressed, modern science and
» technology
» » » so
» » » » advanced, why not even a hair loss treatment are not good?
» » »
» » » modern science advanced ? LOL … if you’ve got any serious disease
» » you
» » » are f*cked up !
» »
» » This is the most agnorant post i have ever seen.
» »
» » Serious diseases are the ones that are not cured yet.
»
» LOL, you don’t know what you’re talking about, you must be an agnorant
» too.
»
»
» » I can name you hundreds of COMMON and DEADLY diseases that you cant
» kill
» » you thanks to modern science.
» »
» » If it wasnt for modern science my whole family should be dead by now.
» »
» » Why do some people choose to see only the negative side?
»
» Your tone is inadequate, I didn’t gave you that confidence, if that can be
» said like that, I don’t know; and I will tell you another thing that I
» don’t know whether it can be said : “Suck me an egg!”
Nothing you say can change the fact your post was agnorant. Sorry.