Why is it that, in spite of the the locked thread at the top of this page, all recent speculation which casts a POSITIVE spin on ICX/TRC has been permitted, unedited or undeleted, whereas threads/post which speculate about ICX/TRC in a negative light are edited or deleted altogether?
» Question:
»
» Why is it that, in spite of the the locked thread at the top of this page,
» all recent speculation which casts a POSITIVE spin on
» ICX/TRC has been permitted, unedited or undeleted, whereas threads/post
» which speculate about ICX/TRC in a negative light are edited or deleted
» altogether?
»
» Anybody else notice this?
Most speculation at this point isn’t that positive…if only.
Where’s the good news? To me, good news is hair multiplication in 2009 or 2010 the latest. I can fly to the UK or any parts of the world if someone has hm to offer.
» Where’s the good news? To me, good news is hair multiplication in 2009 or
» 2010 the latest. I can fly to the UK or any parts of the world if someone
» has hm to offer.
–you just made my point: there isn’t really any concrete, informative news, but it’s ok for people to speculate about how things may be going at ICX, as long as they “play nice”.
» Question:
»
» Why is it that, in spite of the the locked thread at the top of this page,
» all recent speculation which casts a POSITIVE spin on
» ICX/TRC has been permitted, unedited or undeleted, whereas threads/post
» which speculate about ICX/TRC in a negative light are edited or deleted
» altogether?
»
» Anybody else notice this?
yes.
Unnecessary intervention is not recommended.
It scares the intelligent people away, and degrades the quality of the posts.
» » Question:
» »
» » Why is it that, in spite of the the locked thread at the top of this
» page,
» » all recent speculation which casts a POSITIVE spin
» on
» » ICX/TRC has been permitted, unedited or undeleted, whereas threads/post
» » which speculate about ICX/TRC in a negative light are edited or deleted
» » altogether?
» »
» » Anybody else notice this?
»
» yes.
» Unnecessary intervention is not recommended.
» It scares the intelligent people away, and degrades the quality of the
» posts.
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.