» » » » Hair Loss treatment using Acell+PRP injection, 3 months post op.
» » » »
» » » » Photos provided by Dr. Hitzig’s clinic
» » » »
» » » »
» » » »
» » »
» » » Three months???
» » »
» » » Hair grows at less than half an inch a month.
» » »
» » » If new hair started growing immediately–the day after the
» procedure–it
» » » would be less than an inch and a half long at the time the photo was
» » » taken.
» » »
» » » Of course, a lot of 1.5 inch hairs added to the patient’s existing and
» » long
» » » hair, would do a lot to cover the scalp.
» » »
» » » If that is what’s going on here, I’d like to see this patient some
» » months
» » » from now, when the new hair reaches the length of his existing hair.
» » Now
» » » that would be something.
» » »
» » » If that’s what’s going on, that is.
» »
» »
» » These photos demonstrate what I have been saying all along. There is a
» » place for Acell + CRP in the treatment of hair loss. The only thing is
» » that Dr. Hitzig can not produce these types of excellent results, and
» » possibly better results, every time. We know that gogiants got no
» benefit
» » from Acell + PRP. We know the results are not always as good as in
» today’s
» » pictues. These are clearly the best results so far. But we need even
» » better results and we need the results more consistant.
» »
» » Dr. Hitzig needs to add external thrombin, follistatin, noggin, KGF,
» VEGF,
» » and lithium gluconate to the mix. Histogen gets better results more
» often
» » and Histogen is using these growth factors from an external source.
» These
» » external growth factors, or compounds that mimic these external growth
» » factors, are all available on the open market so there is no obstacle to
» » adding these external growth factors, or an acceptable substitute, to
» the
» » mix. Why are the Acell doctors not doing this?
» »
» » Sure the guy in the photo got great results but this is a rarity. Acell
» +
» » CRP typically gets 15% to 20% regrowth, and sometimes no regrowth
» » (gogiants). Histogen gets 73% regrowth much more consistantly. If the
» » Acell + CRP doctors would add these external growth factors then they
» might
» » get better regrowth and better consitancy too.
» »
» » Just do it!!!
»
» You’ve got to be kidding. These “results” are an utter joke, as is your
» non-stop cheerleading for this crap. The hair in the first photo is wet
» from just having the procedure done. It’s very clearly clumping as happens
» when hair gets wet, making him appear far balder than he really is.
»
» No doctor would put up photos like this as “proof” of the procedure
» working. Drs should not be allowed to get away with this type of
» nonsense.
»
» And stop just making numbers up. No one has ever done a proper
» quantitative assessment of PRP. The numbers you’re putting up are coming
» from nowhere other than your imagination.
The photos show about a huge improvement. The patient went from being almost bald on the crown to ending up almost entirely filled in on the crown. I would categorize this one patient’s improvement as “dramatic.” If you can’t see that there is more hair in the after pics then you are impossible to reach. He went from nearly bald to nearly full regrowth.
Look at the first pic - the before pic. Look at the red spots on the patient’s head. You can see those red spots because the patient is nearly bald so you can see a lot of skin. There is very little hair camoflauging the red dots on his crown. There are maybe a half dozen of those red spots on his head in the before pic. Now how about showing me even just ONE of those red dots in the two after pics? Just one. Remember, there are about 6 in the before pic.
All the red spots are gone fool. It’s not that I’m a cheerleader it’s that you are beyond reason. You don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re useless.
Show me just one of those red spots. All 6 of them have vanished because he has recovered enough hair that they are all concealed. Think of those red spots as similar to the single tatoo that a drug company puts on the crown of a test subjects head when they test their hair growth treatments on patient’s heads. Drug companies get excited if their one tatoo on the patient’s head becomes even a little less visible. In this case all half-dozen or so red spots completely vanished.
» » » » Hair Loss treatment using Acell+PRP injection, 3 months post op.
» » » »
» » » » Photos provided by Dr. Hitzig’s clinic
» » » »
» » » »
» » » »
» » »
» » » Three months???
» » »
» » » Hair grows at less than half an inch a month.
» » »
» » » If new hair started growing immediately–the day after the
» procedure–it
» » » would be less than an inch and a half long at the time the photo was
» » » taken.
» » »
» » » Of course, a lot of 1.5 inch hairs added to the patient’s existing and
» » long
» » » hair, would do a lot to cover the scalp.
» » »
» » » If that is what’s going on here, I’d like to see this patient some
» » months
» » » from now, when the new hair reaches the length of his existing hair.
» » Now
» » » that would be something.
» » »
» » » If that’s what’s going on, that is.
» »
» »
» » These photos demonstrate what I have been saying all along. There is a
» » place for Acell + CRP in the treatment of hair loss. The only thing is
» » that Dr. Hitzig can not produce these types of excellent results, and
» » possibly better results, every time. We know that gogiants got no
» benefit
» » from Acell + PRP. We know the results are not always as good as in
» today’s
» » pictues. These are clearly the best results so far. But we need even
» » better results and we need the results more consistant.
» »
» » Dr. Hitzig needs to add external thrombin, follistatin, noggin, KGF,
» VEGF,
» » and lithium gluconate to the mix. Histogen gets better results more
» often
» » and Histogen is using these growth factors from an external source.
» These
» » external growth factors, or compounds that mimic these external growth
» » factors, are all available on the open market so there is no obstacle to
» » adding these external growth factors, or an acceptable substitute, to
» the
» » mix. Why are the Acell doctors not doing this?
» »
» » Sure the guy in the photo got great results but this is a rarity. Acell
» +
» » CRP typically gets 15% to 20% regrowth, and sometimes no regrowth
» » (gogiants). Histogen gets 73% regrowth much more consistantly. If the
» » Acell + CRP doctors would add these external growth factors then they
» might
» » get better regrowth and better consitancy too.
» »
» » Just do it!!!
»
» You’ve got to be kidding. These “results” are an utter joke, as is your
» non-stop cheerleading for this crap. The hair in the first photo is wet
» from just having the procedure done. It’s very clearly clumping as happens
» when hair gets wet, making him appear far balder than he really is.
»
» No doctor would put up photos like this as “proof” of the procedure
» working. Drs should not be allowed to get away with this type of
» nonsense.
»
» And stop just making numbers up. No one has ever done a proper
» quantitative assessment of PRP. The numbers you’re putting up are coming
» from nowhere other than your imagination.
Regards to the before picture’s so-called “clumping”:
I’m not 100% sure this patient’s hair is even wet. And even if it is wet the amount of hair clumping going on would not explain the almost complete coverage he has on the crown. There looks like there could be a little bit of what you call clumping but those clumps are not thick enough to explain the fact that his crown is almost completely covered in the after pics. Those so-called clumps are not that thick.
You are way overstating the amount of the so-called “clumping.” I’m not sure I see any real clumping but if there is some it is not nearly enough to explain the fact that he ends up with his entire crown covered.
» » » » Hair Loss treatment using Acell+PRP injection, 3 months post op.
» » » »
» » » » Photos provided by Dr. Hitzig’s clinic
» » » »
» » » »
» » » »
» » »
» » » Three months???
» » »
» » » Hair grows at less than half an inch a month.
» » »
» » » If new hair started growing immediately–the day after the
» procedure–it
» » » would be less than an inch and a half long at the time the photo was
» » » taken.
» » »
» » » Of course, a lot of 1.5 inch hairs added to the patient’s existing and
» » long
» » » hair, would do a lot to cover the scalp.
» » »
» » » If that is what’s going on here, I’d like to see this patient some
» » months
» » » from now, when the new hair reaches the length of his existing hair.
» » Now
» » » that would be something.
» » »
» » » If that’s what’s going on, that is.
» »
» »
» » These photos demonstrate what I have been saying all along. There is a
» » place for Acell + CRP in the treatment of hair loss. The only thing is
» » that Dr. Hitzig can not produce these types of excellent results, and
» » possibly better results, every time. We know that gogiants got no
» benefit
» » from Acell + PRP. We know the results are not always as good as in
» today’s
» » pictues. These are clearly the best results so far. But we need even
» » better results and we need the results more consistant.
» »
» » Dr. Hitzig needs to add external thrombin, follistatin, noggin, KGF,
» VEGF,
» » and lithium gluconate to the mix. Histogen gets better results more
» often
» » and Histogen is using these growth factors from an external source.
» These
» » external growth factors, or compounds that mimic these external growth
» » factors, are all available on the open market so there is no obstacle to
» » adding these external growth factors, or an acceptable substitute, to
» the
» » mix. Why are the Acell doctors not doing this?
» »
» » Sure the guy in the photo got great results but this is a rarity. Acell
» +
» » CRP typically gets 15% to 20% regrowth, and sometimes no regrowth
» » (gogiants). Histogen gets 73% regrowth much more consistantly. If the
» » Acell + CRP doctors would add these external growth factors then they
» might
» » get better regrowth and better consitancy too.
» »
» » Just do it!!!
»
» You’ve got to be kidding. These “results” are an utter joke, as is your
» non-stop cheerleading for this crap. The hair in the first photo is wet
» from just having the procedure done. It’s very clearly clumping as happens
» when hair gets wet, making him appear far balder than he really is.
»
» No doctor would put up photos like this as “proof” of the procedure
» working. Drs should not be allowed to get away with this type of
» nonsense.
»
» And stop just making numbers up. No one has ever done a proper
» quantitative assessment of PRP. The numbers you’re putting up are coming
» from nowhere other than your imagination.
Look closely at the before pic. Study it. There are perhaps a half dozen red spots on the guys crown. You can see the red spots because you can see a lot of skin. Where did the spots go in the after pics?
» Look closely at the before pic. Study it. There are perhaps a half dozen
» red spots on the guys crown. You can see the red spots because you can see
» a lot of skin. Where did the spots go in the after pics?
What are those red spots? I hope they are not hair transplant grafts, please tell me that this is strictly acell and prp only and no hair transplant was added to the treatment.
» » Look closely at the before pic. Study it. There are perhaps a half
» dozen
» » red spots on the guys crown. You can see the red spots because you can
» see
» » a lot of skin. Where did the spots go in the after pics?
»
» What are those red spots? I hope they are not hair transplant grafts,
» please tell me that this is strictly acell and prp only and no hair
» transplant was added to the treatment.
I don’t know what those red spots are for sure but the point is that they are there in the before pics but not the after pics. They could be the result of the acell injections. The pics could have been taken shortly after the injections.
it does seem like that hair is a little long for just a few months, but the quality of the hair looks decidedly improved and there seems to be considerably more coverage.
» » Look closely at the before pic. Study it. There are perhaps a half
» dozen
» » red spots on the guys crown. You can see the red spots because you can
» see
» » a lot of skin. Where did the spots go in the after pics?
»
» What are those red spots? I hope they are not hair transplant grafts,
» please tell me that this is strictly acell and prp only and no hair
» transplant was added to the treatment.
Red spots are kind of large for injection results. the guy has light skin and light hair. lots of people with light skin/light hair have red spot skin like that.
Actually is quite impossible to say that there’s no new hair there. Let’s say that in the first picture the hair was wet - I’m not sure about it but okay. But just check two of the pictures above:
… and this one:
Okay guys, so according to some people here, he got that amount of hair just because the hair wasn’t wet… really? are you serious?
There’s obviously a regrowth there. Obvious too is that I can’t say why that hair is that long in just 3 months… even having a HT, it’s impossible to have all that long in such a short time.
May Dr. Hitzig come here and explain that to us? Apart from that, pretty good results.
Do you think that maybe there is a slight chance the red dots are from the NEEDLE INJECTIONS he just had into his scalp from the PRP??? Nah, couldn’t be that! They’re gone because the injections have healed; Not because of some miraculous hair growth. You need to open your eyes : That hair is wet and spread out as if briefly toweled dry. Which they do as part of the prp procedure to blot off the excess blood the injections cause. There are youtube videos of the process, i would suggest you look at them and get educated on the process…you won’t be so easily misled. Ask yourself this, why would Hitzig choose to post a before photo of the patient right AFTER he’s recieved the treatment instead of before when the patients hair would be totally dry and combed as it is in the final photos. That would be the only fair way for a prospective patient to make a comparison.
And as others here have made obvious, it would be a true miracle to grow hair to that lenght in 3 months.
And if you’re so convinced this works so well, why not hand over 3K to hitzig and get it done yourself? You could post photos here and prove all the nay sayers wrong and it would only be 3 months from now!!! Hop to it - we’ll be waiting
» Do you think that maybe there is a slight chance the red dots are from the
» NEEDLE INJECTIONS he just had into his scalp from the PRP??? Nah,
» couldn’t be that! They’re gone because the injections have healed; Not
» because of some miraculous hair growth. You need to open your eyes : That
» hair is wet and spread out as if briefly toweled dry. Which they do as
» part of the prp procedure to blot off the excess blood the injections
» cause. There are youtube videos of the process, i would suggest you look at
» them and get educated on the process…you won’t be so easily misled by
» unscrupulous docs like Hitzig. Ask yourself this, why would Hitzig choose
» to post a before photo of the patient right AFTER he’s recieved the
» treatment instead of before when the patients hair would be totally dry and
» combed as it is in the final photos. That would be the only fair way for a
» prospective patient to make a comparison.
»
» And as others here have made obvious, it would be a true miracle to grow
» hair to that lenght in 3 months.
»
» And if you’re so convinced this works so well, why not hand over 3K to
» hitzig and get it done yourself? You could post photos here and prove all
» the nay sayers wrong and it would only be 3 months from now!!! Hop to it -
» we’ll be waiting
I still think that there is way more hair on the crown now then could be found inside those wispy thin “clumps” in the before pic. it is amazing to me that you are trying to tell me that if those thin clumps were not clumps then the number of hairs in those thin clumps would cover the entire crown like the entire crown is covered in the after pic. Give me a break!!! Those thin clumps do not contain that much hair. On the other hand, the “NEW” hair is 2-3 inches long and i can not imagine how new could have grown 2-3 inches in 3 months. It doesn’t seem possible…but it also does not seem possible that inside those thin clumps hides enough hair to cover the entire crown. So I don’t know what to think. And I think you should educate yourself as well. You should take a look at the crown of someone’s head (who has full crown coverage like that guy does in the after pic) when it’s wet and you will see that in order to have clumps that hide enough hair to cover an entire crown it takes thick clumps. Those clumps in the after pics are extremely thin…they are so thin it is really hard to define them as clumps. And yet the supposed “new” hair is just incredibly long after just 3 months.
» it’s odd that new hair could get that long after just 3 months. The new
» hair looks like 2 to 3 inches long.
That is indeed interesting. Assuming the photos are not total fakery, the thickening alone is substantial. In our kind of hair loss, it’s not just the disappearance of hair, it’s the progressive miniaturization that’s a problem, and that also limits the length hair can grow to.
I think that more likely the already existing hairs (that are in those thin “clumps”) were very thin before the treatment and the treatment caused those hairs to plump up…recover their original diamater. It does not look like there are many individual hairs in those so-called “clumps” because the clumps themselves are extremely thin. Most of those so-called “clumps” look like they have like no more than 10 - 20 hairs at most. There should not be enough individual hairs inside those clumps to give almost complete coverage to the crown and yet in the after pics the crown is just about completely covered.
The only thing I can think of is that prior to treatment those individual hairs in the “clumps” had gotten very VERY thin due to androgenetic alopecia and there are a lot more of them in those clumps than it looks like there are and the clumps are just skinny because of the aa-related hair shaft diameter thinning of each of the hairs in the clumps.
If this is the case then that means that Acell + CRP does fix the shaft diameter problem of hairs that you still have even if it does not make lost hair come back.
And it also means that strengthening the treatment (Acell + CRP) with external growth factors, as I have suggested, might cause more improvement in the form of getting some of those lost hairs to come back. If Acell + CRP can get your hairs that have lost their diameter to go back to full thickness maybe adding external growth factors is all that is needed to finish the job and get the peach fuzz to come back to normal hairs as well.
» » it’s odd that new hair could get that long after just 3 months. The new
» » hair looks like 2 to 3 inches long.
»
» That is indeed interesting. Assuming the photos are not total fakery, the
» thickening alone is substantial. In our kind of hair loss, it’s not just
» the disappearance of hair, it’s the progressive miniaturization that’s a
» problem, and that also limits the length hair can grow to.
» » it’s odd that new hair could get that long after just 3 months. The new
» » hair looks like 2 to 3 inches long.
»
» That is indeed interesting. Assuming the photos are not total fakery, the
» thickening alone is substantial. In our kind of hair loss, it’s not just
» the disappearance of hair, it’s the progressive miniaturization that’s a
» problem, and that also limits the length hair can grow to.
We really must find out from Dr Hitzig what will happen if we get the treatment 2-3 times a year, will that improve the results even more without causing side effects?
» »
» » There’s nothing wrong with the photos.
» »
» » I call on you to knock it off.
»
» There is nothing wrong with the photos - unless you are trying to compare
» before/after
»
» The photos tell us nothing and I call on you to get a reality check.
There is obviously more hair coverage. Most likely the diameter of the existing hair thickened rather than peach fuzz turning into full hairs.
Goodbye. I don’t want to deal with your peanut gallery mentality.
»
» 1. There is obviously more hair coverage. Most likely the diameter of the
» existing hair thickened rather than peach fuzz turning into full hairs.
»
Well unfortunately it isn’t obvious as most responses indicate - the terrible quality of the photos for comparison leads to ambiguity.
» 2. Goodbye. I don’t want to deal with your peanut gallery mentality.
Bye - good luck with having the process done, we look forward to the QUALITY photos that you show of your procedure…
This is an advertising site for paid
advertisers to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the
mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful
procedures, lawsuits, litigations, refunds or complaint cases. Surgical hair
restoration procedures carry risks. Please do thorough research, consult your
own physician and investigate a doctor's background carefully before making a
decision. By proceeding to use our site, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy at http://hairsite.com/terms-of-use/ where you can also find a list of HairSite's sponsoring physicians.
