Dr. Armani Hair Clinic - 3,475 grafts - FUE - 9 Months

» Yes, the patient must be happy as the work looks good.
»
» That’s not the point. The only reason they are supplying these pics is not
» for the patient. The patient already knows how the work turned out. Rather
» its for any potential patient. So for the potential patient, I think honest
» pictures are very important in determining what’s needed for themselves.
»
» It might give the false impression that with a few thousand grafts you can
» get your 18 year old hair back.
»
» The above pictures don’t even show where the work was done.
»
» Even the sides and back look better in the after pictures. lol!

I agree, this series of photos , the fact that the before pics are wet
gives a totally unrealistic expectation for such few grafts

show me other work where 3000 something grafts can give such a startling coverage difference? you cant find that

THAT IS WHY , the wet before pics in this are extremely misleading

» Thats an awesome result. Great coverage, and a great transformation.

And you believe that a transformation like depicted in these after photos is possible with 3475 grafts?

I’m sure even before surgery his hair appears much thicker when it is dry versus how it apears in the WET BEFORE pictures taken and posted here.

Additionally, his blog indicates he has had 6460 grafts.

» » Thats an awesome result. Great coverage, and a great transformation.
»
» And you believe that a transformation like depicted in these after photos
» is possible with 3475 grafts?
»
» I’m sure even before surgery his hair appears much thicker when it is dry
» versus how it apears in the WET BEFORE pictures taken and posted here.
»
» Additionally, his blog indicates he has had 6460 grafts.

Pats250 received 6460 grafts. The guy in the picture is not Pats250.

While I wish the same type of pictures were taken (wet / dry pictures), there’s no doubt that there’s a transformation here. Whether the dry hair makes it look thicker or not, I don’t see the concern. We all won’t have natural thickness. The whole point of a transplant is not to be bald.

The point is, no matter how good the hair looks in the after pic, they tried to make it seem like a much more miraculous transformation because they took the before pics WET, which made the before situation look much worse than it actually was

why did they do this? To make the results look much more spectacular than they were

» The point is, no matter how good the hair looks in the after pic, they
» tried to make it seem like a much more miraculous transformation because
» they took the before pics WET, which made the before situation look much
» worse than it actually was
»
» why did they do this? To make the results look much more spectacular than
» they were

According to Pats205, most of it went into 1 & 2. As stated, I wish he posted wet pics or dry before pics, but I don’t need either to see the difference. Is it truly that thick? Given FUE’s inconsistency, I wouldn’t believe it. However, the result is working for this person.

This is all a marketing gimmick: wet vs dry pictures. I guess some people will fall for it, but I won’t.

»» Pats250 received 6460 grafts. The guy in the picture is not Pats250.
»
» While I wish the same type of pictures were taken (wet / dry pictures),
» there’s no doubt that there’s a transformation here. Whether the dry hair
» makes it look thicker or not, I don’t see the concern. We all won’t have
» natural thickness. The whole point of a transplant is not to be bald.

My error. You are correct this person is said to have had 3475 or so grafts.

Makes the point even stronger. If I could get that type of cover with 3500 or so grafts would be on a plane tomorrow to visit that clinic.

» I agree, this series of photos , the fact that the before pics are wet
» gives a totally unrealistic expectation for such few grafts
»
» show me other work where 3000 something grafts can give such a startling
» coverage difference? you cant find that
»

Here you go, this one only needed 2800 grafts and it gives you just as dramatic a difference, both uses wet before pictures to create that effect

http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-51132-page-0-category-2-order-last_answer.html

» » I agree, this series of photos , the fact that the before pics are wet
» » gives a totally unrealistic expectation for such few grafts
» »
» » show me other work where 3000 something grafts can give such a
» startling
» » coverage difference? you cant find that
» »
»
» Here you go, this one only needed 2800 grafts and it gives you just as
» dramatic a difference, both uses wet before pictures to create that effect
»
» http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-51132-page-0-category-2-order-last_answer.html

yes i noticed that one, it is one of the fool you series of pics, bad angles , wet before pics

what i was trying to say is, it is impossible to get such a starting difference on that many grafts without playing around with the pics lighting angles wetness of the hair, etc, 3000 grafts is not enough to make that much of a difference under normal circumstances

» » » I agree, this series of photos , the fact that the before pics are wet
» » » gives a totally unrealistic expectation for such few grafts
» » »
» » » show me other work where 3000 something grafts can give such a
» » startling
» » » coverage difference? you cant find that
» » »
» »
» » Here you go, this one only needed 2800 grafts and it gives you just as
» » dramatic a difference, both uses wet before pictures to create that
» effect
» »
» »
» http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-51132-page-0-category-2-order-last_answer.html
»
» yes i noticed that one, it is one of the fool you series of pics, bad
» angles , wet before pics
»
» what i was trying to say is, it is impossible to get such a starting
» difference on that many grafts without playing around with the pics
» lighting angles wetness of the hair, etc, 3000 grafts is not enough to make
» that much of a difference under normal circumstances

All valid points, but how do you account for Woods’ patient who only had 1100 grafts and went from a NW4 to full head of hair, this one never ceases to amaze me, Hairsite if you are reading please copy the video into this post or let me know how I can do that myself.

http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-21641.html

Regardless of the wet hair in the before… the after pic looks awesome and is totally undetectable. Even if the hair hadn’t been wet, it’s pretty obvious that the entire hairline was re-created.

Another amazing result from the best of the best imo… Consistent results like these im seeing posted on here all the time from the Armani clinic.

One of the best I have seen this one I think

Bottom line is another great success as a result of Dr. Armani’s work. Whether the the pictures are with wet hair or not the work speaks for itself.

Yep, if the pre op pics were dry that patient would have been Rocking an Elvis hair line for sure.

na:-D

NOTE FOLKS … 4 or 5 Armani patient’s (above) trying to defend Armani. LOL!!!

This is NOT about Armani… others are doing it too … It’s about the trend that is just getting worse.

We just ask to please keep it real and PROVIDE PROPER BEFORE & AFTER PICTURES!!!

» All valid points, but how do you account for Woods’ patient who only had
» 1100 grafts and went from a NW4 to full head of hair, this one never ceases
» to amaze me, Hairsite if you are reading please copy the video into this
» post or let me know how I can do that myself.
»
» http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-21641.html

This video goes against everything that I’ve learned about hair transplant, it is impossible to cover that much bald area with only 1100 grafts. Maybe that is a typo.

Hi,

This guy looks great, especially being 40 years old (no offense to anyone 40 or over). I think the pics look okay…they don’t appear to be deceptive at all, they show his hair before and after and you can clearly see the difference.

I always say if people don’t trust pictures to get a free consultation and meet patients in person. I did with Armani and it sealed the deal for me. I am pretty sure almost all doctors give free consultations.

Gabriel

This man had a lot of hair in the top center and crown areas of his head even BEFORE the transplant; this is obvious even though the before photo was taken with WET hair which is obviously to make the hair appear thinner than it actualy is; thereby making the AFTER results taken with DRY hair appear more remarkable.

Why won’t the clinic show the POST OP pictures where the grafts were placed? Is it because the majority of them were placed in the frontal area where it is obvious the man has a lot more hair loss as opposed to the top center and crown?

The board wants to see the POST OP PHOTOS.

» Hi,
»
» This guy looks great, especially being 40 years old (no offense to anyone
» 40 or over). I think the pics look okay…they don’t appear to be
» deceptive at all, they show his hair before and after and you can clearly
» see the difference.
»
» I always say if people don’t trust pictures to get a free consultation and
» meet patients in person. I did with Armani and it sealed the deal for me.
» I am pretty sure almost all doctors give free consultations.
»
» Gabriel

Hey Man!! I completely restored my hairloss with only 3000 grafts!!! It’s as thick as it was when I was 15 years old!!!

And the best thing about it is no one can even tell I have done anything!!!

Really, I’ll post some pictures tomorrow to prove it!!!

Pictures and results look unbelievably stunning, great turn out :slight_smile: