Can we have our private forum Hairsite?

[quote]
[postedby]Originally Posted by Freddie555[/postedby]
Astonishingly, the same monkeys will wonder out loud why is it that in the
21st century there is still no cure for baldness and hardly any
doctors/researchers willing to enter this field of hair loss research.[/quote]

Do you honestly think that any serious career scientist will be put off their work because of what people say on a forum?

the question is not this, but no longer participate in the forum … you know?

NO to a “private forum” and NO to you calling people monkeys. Let the moderators do their job.

[quote]

[postedby]Originally Posted by Freddie555[/postedby]

Bullsh7t. Its nothing more than a dump fest here with monkeys competing among
themselves to see if they can out-do each other in crapping on every thread.

Any doctor contemplating an out of the box treatment/idea who was stupid
enough to post in this forum will find his reputation destroyed and the
subjected of character assassination by monkeys.

Astonishingly, the same monkeys will wonder out loud why is it that in the
21st century there is still no cure for baldness and hardly any
doctors/researchers willing to enter this field of hair loss research.[/quote]

Ridiculous. Do you really think that any researcher is going to somehow limit his research because people disagree with him here. That’s totally absurd.

Further to that, your first sentence once again demonstrates so well the central issue here. People disagree with you (and Nigam’s practices), and you don’t like that. Nigam is “dumped on” because people for good reason find cause to do so. If you can defend Nigam, then do so. Otherwise, move on and participate in the forums like everybody else does, without whining about those who disagree with you, and even worse, calling them names.

The irony of you calling people childish names at the same time as whining about what we post is amusing, to say the least.

Anyway, if you really think that any posts on this forum have any bearing whatsoever on whether or not there is still “no cure for baldness” in the 21st century, then there is little more we can say except that you are totally wrong, to the point of absurdity.

[quote][postedby]Originally Posted by Freddie555[/postedby]
The private forum WILL BE publically viewable.[/quote]

That would be ridiculous and unethical unless it was clearly labelled “$cammers Paradise” to warn newbies that criticism is being removed.

[quote][postedby]Originally Posted by HairSite[/postedby]
Am weighing in all the opinions, will make a decision soon after all the threads in the “Stem cells hair transplant” forum are migrated to this forum.

Thank you and appreciate all the feedback.[/quote]

i guess you must be closing the Gho forum and that s why you are migrating the posts. If you are going to create a private forum, the outcome will be the same as the Gho forum.

[quote]
Do you honestly think that any serious career scientist will be put off their work because of what people say on a forum?[/quote]

There are hardly any career scientists into hair loss research in case you
have not noticed. The possibility of a cure in our lifetime is next to zero.

Monkeys want to ensure it IS zero.

What do monkeys come to this forum for? Its certainly not to discuss
experimental theory & practice. Its nothing more than to get their rocks off
taking a dump in every thread.

Any hair loss researcher (assuming there still are some left) stupid enough to
enter the hair research field had better be working in secret. Conversing in
a forum like this with monkeys all around will do him tremendous harm.

There is nothing to be gained conversing with monkeys.

Anyways I’m tired of this and am not reading any more blabbering from these
chattering apes. I’d like to know from Hairsite if we (people interested
in hair loss research & ideas thereof) can have our own forum. If so, the
rest of you can have this forum and go back to taking a sh7t in every thread
and on every one as you please.

When can we have the decision Hairsite. I’ve nominated roger_that to be the
moderator as he seems one of the few with an above average IQ here.

[quote][postedby]Originally Posted by roger_that[/postedby]
Yes, and get spammed in seconds, too. Yahoo is the number one spam target on the interwebs.

Hairsite is the prestige hairloss destination website, and you’re telling us to go meet the researchers at McDonald’s.[/quote] Acceptance is private so how could one forum be spammed?

I don’t see any difference between the “spammability” at hair (wchich gest spammed from time to time) with a private yahoo forum.

[quote][postedby]Originally Posted by roger_that[/postedby]
Yes, and get spammed in seconds, too. Yahoo is the number one spam target on the interwebs.

Hairsite is the prestige hairloss destination website, and you’re telling us to go meet the researchers at McDonald’s.

[postedby]Originally Posted by bugler[/postedby] Acceptance is private so how could one forum be spammed?

I don’t see any difference between the “spammability” at hair (wchich gest spammed from time to time) with a private yahoo forum.[/quote]

Check out any “private” Yahoo forum with “private” acceptance and you will see an atrocious amount of spam. Plus Yahoo has a really widespread image as a “junk” website brand these days. It’s a disorganized zoo, has big problems with privacy protection, is prone to major hacking incidents and just had some serious data breaches that affected millions of users. Marissa Mayer is trying to save a sinking ship.

Seriously, if you take off all the Nigerian sc@mmers, Russian hackers and American snake-oil salesmen and porn industry people from that website, you have like 6 people using it.

So, let me understand this correctly. You think that Nigam might be on to something big here, might have either a functional cure or at least better treatment for hair loss, something that we all know would be worth billions, and you think that he might not pursue that because people on a hair loss forum disagree with him?

Do you seriously believe that? And you have the gall to call other people names, and suggest that other people lack intelligence.

Seriously, what you are suggesting here is completely ridiculous.

If you want your own private forum where you can fawn over Nigam or whoever it is that happens to be your flavor of the day, go somewhere else and make one.

I don’t see any need for another private forum.

My vote is to keep Hairsite open and transparent.

I fully support the creation of a private forum dedicated to this purpose.

While I have zero interest in participating in that forum, I feel it would be a tremendous benefit to the hairloss community to isolate, from the public, all discussion supporting Nigam’s techniques. It is both unconscionable and inexcusable to continue granting this “research” any degree of legitimacy afforded by a sponsorship.

If this infectious blight of irresponsibility can not be stopped, it should still be quarantined to whatever extent possible.

[quote][postedby]Originally Posted by Flynn[/postedby]
I fully support the creation of a private forum dedicated to this purpose.

While I have zero interest in participating in that forum, I feel it would be a tremendous benefit to the hairloss community to isolate, from the public, all discussion supporting Nigam’s techniques. It is both unconscionable and inexcusable to continue granting this “research” any degree of legitimacy afforded by a sponsorship.

If this infectious blight of irresponsibility can not be stopped, it should still be quarantined to whatever extent possible.[/quote]

I agree with you whole heartedly. Locking that up in a private forum that only allowed members to view and post would keep this nonsense out of the public eye. But, that’s not what they are asking for. They want a forum that is semi-private, where they get to determine who posts and who doesn’t. So, this “research” (cough, cough) is going to be open to viewing by the general public. All critical discussion of that research will be repressed, comments edited, posts deleted at the discretion/whining of Nigam’s fanboys. So, in that situation, you will get the worst case scenario of all.

And this move will do nothing more than further alienate those who are interested in discussing matters objectively and care to see patient’s health/safety and finances at a priority over clinics, doctors and corporations.