@Benji and Hairsite: about JB and Monty

Benji, are you sure that JB=Monty?
There are reasons to believe it, but have you checked Monty’s posts?
(10 posts).

I have my doubts that he is JB, check out this thread:
http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-15700.html

Both Monty and JB posted in this thread, the same day.
It is possible to post with different nicks from different PCs, but mmmmh, I feel that this is not the case now, and I wouldn’t like to accuse JB of something that he has not done.

Hairsite, could you check the IPs in that thead to see if they are from the same city? The IPs of JB and Monty.

thanks

» Benji, are you sure that JB=Monty?
» There are reasons to believe it, but have you checked Monty’s posts?
» (10 posts).
»
» I have my doubts that he is JB, check out this thread:
» http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-15700.html
»
» Both Monty and JB posted in this thread, the same day.
» It is possible to post with different nicks from different PCs, but mmmmh,
» I feel that this is not the case now, and I wouldn’t like to accuse JB of
» something that he has not done.
»
» Hairsite, could you check the IPs in that thead to see if they are from
» the same city? The IPs of JB and Monty.
»
» thanks

JB has been a long time poster. I know he would not do something like that. Please just let this go. It’s really not worth sweating over things like that.

» » Benji, are you sure that JB=Monty?
» » There are reasons to believe it, but have you checked Monty’s posts?
» » (10 posts).
» »
» » I have my doubts that he is JB, check out this thread:
» » http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-15700.html
» »
» » Both Monty and JB posted in this thread, the same day.
» » It is possible to post with different nicks from different PCs, but
» mmmmh,
» » I feel that this is not the case now, and I wouldn’t like to accuse JB
» of
» » something that he has not done.
» »
» » Hairsite, could you check the IPs in that thead to see if they are from
» » the same city? The IPs of JB and Monty.
» »
» » thanks
»
» JB has been a long time poster. I know he would not do something like
» that. Please just let this go. It’s really not worth sweating over things
» like that.

I also think so. After reading Morty’s messages, I don’t see what interest could have JB in posting as Morty, but who knows, JB has done weird things in the past…
I just wanted to express my doubts about our initial accusation (that JB=Morty).
For me its over, although checking the IPs could have solved the issue completely.
Benji, anything to add?

Benji, why did you link James Bond with Rudyard Kipling?
After your post, I assumed that JB had posted before at hairsite
about Rudyard Kipling, and that is why you were linking both…
but the search engine at Hairsite, for “Rudyard Kipling”, only retrieves Monty’s post.

whatever dude…it doesnt matter now. We wont know anything until September and it makes the HM forum moot for now. What I kinda dread is that in September ICX could just say their last cohort all had “signifigat” increases in hair and again not actually show any photos or give any statistical increases in hair counts, weights, measures with a densometer or anything. This would mean we dont know anymore that what we do now. Aderans has six months to make a bid…and its unlikely even if the results are pretty fair and ICX is just being coy that they are likely to buy right away. It would probably be a month or two anyway while they haggle price. And if Aderans buys, who knows if they will even put it up on their website. You might have to wait for the next December ICX report for them to note offhandedly, “we sold the rights to TRC to a Japanese Company, Aderans fox X-amount of dollars” or “Aderans, Wigmaker and owner of Bosley hair transplant clinics, is sponsoring a new phase two trial”…

Follica is the next thing to watch in the meantime.

Okay, then I assume that James Bond and Monty are not the same person.
Fine, then no need for IP checkins, Hairsite.

Anyway, reading Monty’s posts, I have found this document about ICX which is quite interesting to see things in perspective:

http://www.intercytex.com/icx/investors/rep/otherdocs/2006-08-03/at_aim.pdf

page 41, onwards.

This document is very interesting, and now I am reconsidering my position a bit. I am going to post a separate thread.