» » » In May 2007 cotsarelis said “2/3 years”, now “within 5 years”…He
» » » only of himself … Our hopes are closes: we live our lives by bald!
» » »
» » »
» » I wonder why the second patent wasn’t pressing the wnt
» factor. Am I
» » missing something here? I thought it was all about EGF-R inhibition
» » the embryonic window.
» It was just a patent, Not a research paper! The original research paper
» specifically talked about Wnt, so did Elain Fuchs’s research. That’s what
» I’ve been saying on this board all along i.e. we should not waste our time
» with EGFR and whether its a small molecule or not, and whether it’s been
» delivered to the follicles or not. The main thing that’s coming up in
» proper research (not some patent) is Wnt. Like Cotsarelis himself just
» said, you increase Wnt and the hair growth goes wild! why are we wasting
» our time playing with somewhat risky EGFRs? We should find a better way of
» increasing/activating Wnt signaling, From all the research i’ve seen this
» should give us decent regrowth!
» Guys, I really believe that we should change our focus to Wnt and
» experiment with that or at least discuss better ways of manipulating Wnt. I
» have this feeling that simply mixing lithium in DMSO just isn’t good
I agree. and wasn’t Baccy specifically going Wnt route? And wasn’t he that actually got something to show for it? I think we can crack this nut if we get enough of our own “trialists” to try different protocols targeting Wnt alone. I know- wishful thinking.