» There are TONS of guys out there with FULL HEADS of hair, never lost one
» hair, who are friggin ugly…hair will not change
» an ugly man into a stud
»
» so maybe maneless hair wont help you…do not assume
» hair will make you a chick magnet
»
Hangin , you are wrong…all the girls want you for money , smartness…if they compromise to soemthing less its because they realised they could not get better…take this from me…I may be younger than you but I had such a rich journey and I’m sure many very elderly dont have a portion of it…
Anyway for the picture you posted of that guy…well guess what …let him do body building for 6 months…remove those glasses…dress his teeth…do a quick 2 Hours surgery for his ears to get them right with his head shape ( just in a case we have them natural in the picture and I dont think that to be the case , seems they did an ears works to make the idiot effect) dress his eyebrows and eyelashes.Finally give him a bustard Hair cute…and let us talk again about him
On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology points :
The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely to form long standing relationships with those who are equally physically attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969) supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking for each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated in terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples of similar attractiveness to date or engage.
(from a previous post).
So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and leave aside your assumptions.
» On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology points
» :
»
» The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people
» become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely to
» form long standing relationships with those who are equally physically
» attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were
» similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking for
» each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the
» matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated in
» terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples of
» similar attractiveness to date or engage.
»
» (from a previous post).
»
» So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might
» give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and leave
» aside your assumptions.
i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking up, etc
i said you can be ugly with a full head of hair…hair wont make an ugly guy attractive
» » » » Please stop posting, no one cares. It’s absolutely astonding, you
» » » » seriously believe that hair is the one and only reason for your
» lack
» » of
» » » » success with women. Talk about deluded.
» » »
» » » No, I won’t stop posting. If you don’t like my posts then don’t read
» » » them. And yes, I know that the once I get my hair back I’ll have
» women
» » all
» » » over me, and the women will be attractive. I can get women now but
» it
» » » won’t be the same women I can get when I have a full head of hair.
» And
» » if
» » » you are bald then you aren’t getting hot women either and I know it.
» » Bite
» » » that!
» »
» » This is irony at it’s best, you’re obviously so wound up about the fact
» » that women judge you because you’re bald, but you’re judging women soley
» on
» » their apperance too, hypocrite.
» »
» » I’m not bald, and I have a lovely girl - nice try. 
»
» No, you read incorrect sh!t into the things other people say. I’m not one
» bit wound up that women judge men largely on men’s appearance. I don’t
» blame women one bit for doing that. We, myself included, do the same thing
» to women. And it sounds like you do too or else you wouldn’t have made
» sure you got yourself a “lovely girl.”
»
» I am wound up because I can’t get the hot women that I used to be able to
» get and truth to tell I do not believe you have a “lovely girl” unless you
» got her before you started losing your hair or when you had only lost a
» little hair.
»
» And if you are actually telling the truth and you really do have a “lovely
» girl” despite your hairloss then you have big character/mental problems
» because that would mean that you don’t need hair to get attractive women
» and that begs the question “why do you need hair?” Do you need it for
» confidence? If you do then you are a weak boy instead of a man, and you’re
» girlish because you apparently want to sit like some lady fair in front of
» some vanity mirror feasting on your prettiness so you can get confidence
» like some delicate pretty woman.
»
» I want hair to get lots of hot women into the sack. Bite that dude. I
» don’t need hair for confidence, and I certainly don’t worry about feeling
» pretty. I’m sorry that your character issues make you desire feeling
» pretty the same way a woman desires to feel pretty.
What the hell were you rambling on about? That was barely even legible. You contradicted yourself several times and quite frankly I can’t be bothered pointing all the examples out, it’s a waste of my time. If you’re too much of a brain dead dolt to string together four coherent paragraphs then I’m not wasting my time with you. You’re like an advert for natural selection.
» » There are TONS of guys out there with FULL HEADS of hair, never lost one
» » hair, who are friggin ugly…hair will not
» change
» » an ugly man into a stud
» »
» » so maybe maneless hair wont help you…do not
» assume
» » hair will make you a chick magnet
» »
»
»
»
» Hangin , you are wrong…all the girls want you for money , smartness…if
» they compromise to soemthing less its because they realised they could not
» get better…take this from me…I may be younger than you but I had such a
» rich journey and I’m sure many very elderly dont have a portion of it…
» Anyway for the picture you posted of that guy…well guess what …let him
» do body building for 6 months…remove those glasses…dress his teeth…do a
» quick 2 Hours surgery for his ears to get them right with his head shape
» ( just in a case we have them natural in the picture and I dont think that
» to be the case , seems they did an ears works to make the idiot effect)
» dress his eyebrows and eyelashes.Finally give him a bustard Hair cute…and
» let us talk again about him
are u saying you would date the guy? are u attracted to men? just curious
» On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology points
» :
»
» The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people
» become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely to
» form long standing relationships with those who are equally physically
» attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were
» similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking for
» each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the
» matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated in
» terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples of
» similar attractiveness to date or engage.
»
» (from a previous post).
»
» So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might
» give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and leave
» aside your assumptions.
And when she gets together with the guy in her “looks range” she will talk about his personality and how different he is, and some of that may be her true feelings about his personality and him being “different”, but a lot of that is just her blowing smoke. I was reading an article the other day about a woman and she was giving guys advice about dating. She was talking about some guy who she dated for the first time and she said he wasn’t “special” enough to sleep with. She said the guy left mad. What do you think a woman means when she says some guy is or isn’t “special?” If he had been “special” he would have gotten laid but since he wasn’t special he didn’t and he was feeling bad (as evinced by him being disgruntled). He lost. If he had been “special” he would have won.
» » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology
» points
» » :
» »
» » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people
» » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely
» to
» » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» physically
» » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were
» » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking
» for
» » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the
» » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated
» in
» » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples
» of
» » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» »
» » (from a previous post).
» »
» » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might
» » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and
» leave
» » aside your assumptions.
»
» And when she gets together with the guy in her “looks range” she will talk
» about his personality and how different he is, and some of that may be her
» true feelings about his personality and him being “different”, but a lot of
» that is just her blowing smoke. I was reading an article the other day
» about a woman and she was giving guys advice about dating. She was talking
» about some guy who she dated for the first time and she said he wasn’t
» “special” enough to sleep with. She said the guy left mad. What do you
» think a woman means when she says some guy is or isn’t “special?” If he
» had been “special” he would have gotten laid but since he wasn’t special he
» didn’t and he was feeling bad (as evinced by him being disgruntled). He
» lost. If he had been “special” he would have won.
maneless its called chemistry
it can be caused by many things but physical attractiveness is not the be all end all
havent you ever seen a woman who on the outside would be considered a fox, but her personality sucked, she was stuck up. arrogant, nasty tempered, condescending etc
that personality made her ugly didnt it? it cancelled out her physical beauty
same thing with a man, just because he might be attractive does not mean he is a chick magnet. if he cant talk to a woman if he is only interested in himself. what woman wants that? they might want him sure for one night but thats it
» » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology
» points
» » :
» »
» » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people
» » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely
» to
» » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» physically
» » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were
» » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking
» for
» » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the
» » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated
» in
» » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples
» of
» » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» »
» » (from a previous post).
» »
» » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might
» » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and
» leave
» » aside your assumptions.
»
» i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking up, etc
»
» i said you can be ugly with a full head of hair…hair wont
» make an ugly guy attractive
The guys here who want hair are better looking with hair or else they wouldn’t want hair. For example, if I looked better without hair I would be trying to keep hair off of my head instead of trying to get hair back on my head.
» » » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology
» » points
» » » :
» » »
» » » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why
» people
» » » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more
» likely
» » to
» » » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» » physically
» » » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» » » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who
» were
» » » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking
» » for
» » » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported
» the
» » » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were
» rated
» » in
» » » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for
» couples
» » of
» » » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» » »
» » » (from a previous post).
» » »
» » » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he
» might
» » » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and
» » leave
» » » aside your assumptions.
» »
» » i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking up,
» etc
» »
» » i said you can be ugly with a full head of hair…hair
» wont
» » make an ugly guy attractive
»
» The guys here who want hair are better looking with hair or else they
» wouldn’t want hair. For example, if I looked better without hair I would
» be trying to keep hair off of my head instead of trying to get hair back on
» my head.
true they may look better with hair, that does not mean they are chick magnets with hair…i can take an ugly guy and make him less attractive by making him bald, that does not mean he was a chick magnet when he had hair…you seem to think you can get 10s if you had your hair back…who says you are a chick magnet when you had hair?
» » » » » Please stop posting, no one cares. It’s absolutely astonding, you
» » » » » seriously believe that hair is the one and only reason for your
» » lack
» » » of
» » » » » success with women. Talk about deluded.
» » » »
» » » » No, I won’t stop posting. If you don’t like my posts then don’t
» read
» » » » them. And yes, I know that the once I get my hair back I’ll have
» » women
» » » all
» » » » over me, and the women will be attractive. I can get women now but
» » it
» » » » won’t be the same women I can get when I have a full head of hair.
» » And
» » » if
» » » » you are bald then you aren’t getting hot women either and I know it.
»
» » » Bite
» » » » that!
» » »
» » » This is irony at it’s best, you’re obviously so wound up about the
» fact
» » » that women judge you because you’re bald, but you’re judging women
» soley
» » on
» » » their apperance too, hypocrite.
» » »
» » » I’m not bald, and I have a lovely girl - nice try.
» »
» » No, you read incorrect sh!t into the things other people say. I’m not
» one
» » bit wound up that women judge men largely on men’s appearance. I don’t
» » blame women one bit for doing that. We, myself included, do the same
» thing
» » to women. And it sounds like you do too or else you wouldn’t have made
» » sure you got yourself a “lovely girl.”
» »
» » I am wound up because I can’t get the hot women that I used to be able
» to
» » get and truth to tell I do not believe you have a “lovely girl” unless
» you
» » got her before you started losing your hair or when you had only lost a
» » little hair.
» »
» » And if you are actually telling the truth and you really do have a
» “lovely
» » girl” despite your hairloss then you have big character/mental problems
» » because that would mean that you don’t need hair to get attractive
» women
» » and that begs the question “why do you need hair?” Do you need it for
» » confidence? If you do then you are a weak boy instead of a man, and
» you’re
» » girlish because you apparently want to sit like some lady fair in front
» of
» » some vanity mirror feasting on your prettiness so you can get
» confidence
» » like some delicate pretty woman.
» »
» » I want hair to get lots of hot women into the sack. Bite that dude. I
» » don’t need hair for confidence, and I certainly don’t worry about
» feeling
» » pretty. I’m sorry that your character issues make you desire feeling
» » pretty the same way a woman desires to feel pretty.
»
» What the hell were you rambling on about? That was barely even legible.
» You contradicted yourself several times and quite frankly I can’t be
» bothered pointing all the examples out, it’s a waste of my time. If you’re
» too much of a brain dead dolt to string together four coherent paragraphs
» then I’m not wasting my time with you. You’re like an advert for natural
» selection.
So since communicating with me is a waste of your time that surely means you won’t bother with me anymore unless you are a dolt. I’m glad to be rid of you airhead.
» » » » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology
» » » points
» » » » :
» » » »
» » » » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why
» » people
» » » » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more
» » likely
» » » to
» » » » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» » » physically
» » » » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» » » » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who
» » were
» » » » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most
» liking
» » » for
» » » » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported
» » the
» » » » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were
» » rated
» » » in
» » » » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for
» » couples
» » » of
» » » » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» » » »
» » » » (from a previous post).
» » » »
» » » » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he
» » might
» » » » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and
» » » leave
» » » » aside your assumptions.
» » »
» » » i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking up,
» » etc
» » »
» » » i said you can be ugly with a full head of hair…hair
» » wont
» » » make an ugly guy attractive
» »
» » The guys here who want hair are better looking with hair or else they
» » wouldn’t want hair. For example, if I looked better without hair I
» would
» » be trying to keep hair off of my head instead of trying to get hair back
» on
» » my head.
»
» true they may look better with hair, that does not mean they are chick
» magnets with hair…i can take an ugly guy and make
» him less attractive by making him bald, that does not mean he was a chick
» magnet when he had hair…you seem to think you can get 10s if
» you had your hair back…who says you are a chick magnet
» when you had hair?
I had lots of hot women when I had a full head of hair so that is all that matters to me. And while they all were NOT 10s, almost all of them were at least 7s. I only had a couple women who were less than 7s. 7s and 8s were common for me and I got a few 9s and occassional 10s.
» On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology points
» :
»
» The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why people
» become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more likely to
» form long standing relationships with those who are equally physically
» attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who were
» similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking for
» each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the
» matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated in
» terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couples of
» similar attractiveness to date or engage.
»
» (from a previous post).
»
» So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he might
» give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and leave
» aside your assumptions.
they just found a “tendency”. that there is a “tendency” for your point is not enough to prove that there arent other factors.
i agree, you have advances if you look good. definatley. but its not the only thing.
» » » » » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social
» psychology
» » » » points
» » » » » :
» » » » »
» » » » » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why
» » » people
» » » » » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more
» » » likely
» » » » to
» » » » » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» » » » physically
» » » » » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster
» (1969)
» » » » » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who
» » » were
» » » » » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most
» » liking
» » » » for
» » » » » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that
» supported
» » » the
» » » » » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples
» were
» » » rated
» » » » in
» » » » » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for
» » » couples
» » » » of
» » » » » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» » » » »
» » » » » (from a previous post).
» » » » »
» » » » » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he
» » » might
» » » » » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational
» and
» » » » leave
» » » » » aside your assumptions.
» » » »
» » » » i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking
» up,
» » » etc
» » » »
» » » » i said you can be ugly with a full head of
» hair…hair
» » » wont
» » » » make an ugly guy attractive
» » »
» » » The guys here who want hair are better looking with hair or else they
» » » wouldn’t want hair. For example, if I looked better without hair I
» » would
» » » be trying to keep hair off of my head instead of trying to get hair
» back
» » on
» » » my head.
» »
» » true they may look better with hair, that does not mean they are chick
» » magnets with hair…i can take an ugly guy and
» make
» » him less attractive by making him bald, that does not mean he was a
» chick
» » magnet when he had hair…you seem to think you can get 10s
» if
» » you had your hair back…who says you are a chick
» magnet
» » when you had hair?
»
» I had lots of hot women when I had a full head of hair so that is all that
» matters to me. And while they all were NOT 10s, almost all of them were at
» least 7s. I only had a couple women who were less than 7s. 7s and 8s were
» common for me and I got a few 9s and occassional 10s.
you seem to suffer from delusional fantasies
I totally see maneless with NW1 hairline. Really.
» » » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social psychology
» » points
» » » :
» » »
» » » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why
» people
» » » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more
» likely
» » to
» » » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» » physically
» » » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster (1969)
» » » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who
» were
» » » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most liking
» » for
» » » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported
» the
» » » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were
» rated
» » in
» » » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for
» couples
» » of
» » » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» » »
» » » (from a previous post).
» » »
» » » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he
» might
» » » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational and
» » leave
» » » aside your assumptions.
» »
» » And when she gets together with the guy in her “looks range” she will
» talk
» » about his personality and how different he is, and some of that may be
» her
» » true feelings about his personality and him being “different”, but a lot
» of
» » that is just her blowing smoke. I was reading an article the other day
» » about a woman and she was giving guys advice about dating. She was
» talking
» » about some guy who she dated for the first time and she said he wasn’t
» » “special” enough to sleep with. She said the guy left mad. What do
» you
» » think a woman means when she says some guy is or isn’t “special?” If
» he
» » had been “special” he would have gotten laid but since he wasn’t special
» he
» » didn’t and he was feeling bad (as evinced by him being disgruntled).
» He
» » lost. If he had been “special” he would have won.
»
» maneless its called chemistry
»
» it can be caused by many things but physical attractiveness is not the be
» all end all
»
» havent you ever seen a woman who on the outside would be considered a fox,
» but her personality sucked, she was stuck up. arrogant, nasty tempered,
» condescending etc
»
» that personality made her ugly didnt it? it cancelled out her physical
» beauty
You got that right. That’s one of the reasons I didn’t get together with many 9s or 10s. Most of them are vapid, arrogant, and mean. I just don’t like most 9s and 10s. Most of them simply are not nice women. I like women to be attractive but I also like them to be nice.
»
» same thing with a man, just because he might be attractive does not mean
» he is a chick magnet. if he cant talk to a woman if he is only interested
» in himself. what woman wants that? they might want him sure for one night
» but thats it
Hangin, keep your mouth shut when you feel that you are about to say something ridiculous
» Hangin, keep your mouth shut when you feel that you are about to say
» something ridiculous:-D 
» » » » » » Please stop posting, no one cares. It’s absolutely astonding,
» you
» » » » » » seriously believe that hair is the one and only reason for your
» » » lack
» » » » of
» » » » » » success with women. Talk about deluded.
» » » » »
» » » » » No, I won’t stop posting. If you don’t like my posts then don’t
» » read
» » » » » them. And yes, I know that the once I get my hair back I’ll have
» » » women
» » » » all
» » » » » over me, and the women will be attractive. I can get women now
» but
» » » it
» » » » » won’t be the same women I can get when I have a full head of hair.
»
» » » And
» » » » if
» » » » » you are bald then you aren’t getting hot women either and I know
» it.
» »
» » » » Bite
» » » » » that!
» » » »
» » » » This is irony at it’s best, you’re obviously so wound up about the
» » fact
» » » » that women judge you because you’re bald, but you’re judging women
» » soley
» » » on
» » » » their apperance too, hypocrite.
» » » »
» » » » I’m not bald, and I have a lovely girl - nice try.
» » »
» » » No, you read incorrect sh!t into the things other people say. I’m
» not
» » one
» » » bit wound up that women judge men largely on men’s appearance. I
» don’t
» » » blame women one bit for doing that. We, myself included, do the same
» » thing
» » » to women. And it sounds like you do too or else you wouldn’t have
» made
» » » sure you got yourself a “lovely girl.”
» » »
» » » I am wound up because I can’t get the hot women that I used to be
» able
» » to
» » » get and truth to tell I do not believe you have a “lovely girl”
» unless
» » you
» » » got her before you started losing your hair or when you had only lost
» a
» » » little hair.
» » »
» » » And if you are actually telling the truth and you really do have a
» » “lovely
» » » girl” despite your hairloss then you have big character/mental
» problems
» » » because that would mean that you don’t need hair to get attractive
» » women
» » » and that begs the question “why do you need hair?” Do you need it
» for
» » » confidence? If you do then you are a weak boy instead of a man, and
» » you’re
» » » girlish because you apparently want to sit like some lady fair in
» front
» » of
» » » some vanity mirror feasting on your prettiness so you can get
» » confidence
» » » like some delicate pretty woman.
» » »
» » » I want hair to get lots of hot women into the sack. Bite that dude.
» I
» » » don’t need hair for confidence, and I certainly don’t worry about
» » feeling
» » » pretty. I’m sorry that your character issues make you desire feeling
» » » pretty the same way a woman desires to feel pretty.
» »
» » What the hell were you rambling on about? That was barely even legible.
»
» » You contradicted yourself several times and quite frankly I can’t be
» » bothered pointing all the examples out, it’s a waste of my time. If
» you’re
» » too much of a brain dead dolt to string together four coherent
» paragraphs
» » then I’m not wasting my time with you. You’re like an advert for
» natural
» » selection.
»
» So since communicating with me is a waste of your time that surely means
» you won’t bother with me anymore unless you are a dolt. I’m glad to be rid
» of you airhead.
maneless he is right, you are not the brightest bulb
perhaps you were dropped on your head when you were a child
» » » » » On a scientific level here is some psychology and Social
» psychology
» » » » points
» » » » » :
» » » » »
» » » » » The matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman (1952) suggests why
» » » people
» » » » » become attracted to their partner. It claims that people are more
» » » likely
» » » » to
» » » » » form long standing relationships with those who are equally
» » » » physically
» » » » » attractive as they are. The study by Walster and Walster
» (1969)
» » » » » supported the matching hypothesis by showing that partners who
» » » were
» » » » » similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the most
» » liking
» » » » for
» » » » » each other. Murstein (1972) also found evidence that
» supported
» » » the
» » » » » matching hypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples
» were
» » » rated
» » » » in
» » » » » terms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for
» » » couples
» » » » of
» » » » » similar attractiveness to date or engage.
» » » » »
» » » » » (from a previous post).
» » » » »
» » » » » So for Hangin, helpme007 or anyone else willing to countersay he
» » » might
» » » » » give his scientific replication for this.So please be rational
» and
» » » » leave
» » » » » aside your assumptions.
» » » »
» » » » i didnt say attractiveness has nothing to do with dating hooking
» up,
» » » etc
» » » »
» » » » i said you can be ugly with a full head of
» hair…hair
» » » wont
» » » » make an ugly guy attractive
» » »
» » » The guys here who want hair are better looking with hair or else they
» » » wouldn’t want hair. For example, if I looked better without hair I
» » would
» » » be trying to keep hair off of my head instead of trying to get hair
» back
» » on
» » » my head.
» »
» » true they may look better with hair, that does not mean they are chick
» » magnets with hair…i can take an ugly guy and
» make
» » him less attractive by making him bald, that does not mean he was a
» chick
» » magnet when he had hair…you seem to think you can get 10s
» if
» » you had your hair back…who says you are a chick
» magnet
» » when you had hair?
»
» I had lots of hot women when I had a full head of hair so that is all that
» matters to me. And while they all were NOT 10s, almost all of them were at
» least 7s. I only had a couple women who were less than 7s. 7s and 8s were
» common for me and I got a few 9s and occassional 10s.
Judging women’s attractiveness on a linear scale…that type of shallow thinking is why many of us are in this forum in the first place. We are judging ourselves on the same kind of scale.