I think that the worse are:
-
arashi
-
myself2
-
mookoopoo
-
Archibald
There are others who are doing inappropriate attacks but the above 3 are the worse.
Roger_that I’m glad that you perceive a couple important points:
-
There’s no reason to condemn Dr. Nigam at this point in time. He’s simply trying to do some experiments and push the envelope right now. There’s no reason to call him a criminal fr@ud now because we all know that at this time he’s still trying to figure out how to treat baldness. He’s not saying that he has a cure yet. He’s publicly stating that he’s still trying to figure out how to treat hair loss and he readily admits that he is not there yet.
-
His photos are imperfect but do they make it impossible to see what is happening on patient’s heads. In a few cases yet, but in most cases you can tell if the patient has some thickening or not. He posted photos that I felt showed little or no thickening and he posted photos that showed some meaningful thickening. His latest pics - they were black and white. That’s not good because black and white are very uncustomary in these before and after hair pics, but he has an explanation. He says he rendered them black and white because the coloration was off for some reason and because of excessive flash. His explanation is reasonable enough especially when you consider that the originals have been posted and there REALLY IS a coloration issue and there is significant flash. So he used black and white simply to keep the flash and coloration issue from being a distraction.
What is so unreasonable about that explanation?
Why does he deserve to be called a criminal fr@ud over this?
Even though the pics are black and white you can still perceive that there is some thickening although I do admit that there is some blurring in the crown area that is not there in the original.
And this seems key to me because one thing the mudslingers are complaining about is the burring in the black and white “after” pic and there is blurring in that pic but there is NO blurring in the colored “after” pic and that “after” pic is very detailed and it shows thickening of the hair.
So let’s check off some things we know:
-
He says he made it black and white to offset some technical problems with the photos. There really are technical problems with the photos (coloration and flash) so his side of the story checks out.
-
The mudslingers claim that there is blurring in the crown area of the black and white “after” pic and unfortunately they’re right but that does not mean that the blurring is an intentional act by Dr. Nigam to deceive anyone. It could just be some kind of technical issue or something. But there’s still the fact that there’s blurring so we can’t be 100% sure whether or not there’s thickening. OK, so see item 3 below
-
Lo and behold, Dr. Nigam produces the originals and there is no blurring and there is obvious thickening of the hairs in the crown area so this means that not only is there thickening in the crown but also that whatever caused the blurring in the black and white “after” pic is some minor tech issue because if Dr. Nigam was trying to intentionally make the crown in the after pic blurry then he would have blurred the crown in the original after pic as well. So the blurring in the crown area of the black and white after pic is meaningless. The guy’s hair has thickened and it’s obvious. In the originals you can actually follow the the hairs down to the skin in many cases. The detail is very good.
So what if the pics are in black and white? It gets your attention that Dr. Nigam made the pics black and white instead of color but when you consider all of the facts it does not matter.