» » Of course you post some guy who still has 95 percent of his hair, and do
» » that many grafts on him,
» » is it any surprise he has a good result?
» » try posting a nw4 or a nw5 and show us your work, then we can decide if
» » this is a good surgeon worth going to…not that I would get a
» » transplant anyway
» Wait a minute, are you telling the people here that this guy had 95% of
» his hair?, if yes then you should check again more thoroughly,this guy was
» NW6 two years ago, then after the treatment with Finasteride and Minioxidil
» he recovered some hair, specially some vellus hair but far away from get
» 95% of his hair back because this hair doesnt produce coverage or density,
» but helps when add more hair like in this case to produce much better
» result in terms of density and coverage.
» On the other hand it looks like you disliked that the patient has obtained
» a good result, I do not say that you are unhappy with this, I just say that
» it looks like.
How he got the hair he had prior to the transplant is irrelevant
if it all grew back from Minoxidil etc,
the point is , prior to the transplant he really had very little hair that had to be regained or filled in by the transplant
the fact that the result looks good, (4000 grafts) on a guy who had such a strong hairline to begin with, is not impressive
impressive would be a guy who had severe hair loss , then a great after result from the transplant
I would say that any competent hair transplant surgeon could have gotten a similar result with this patient